10.23更新:装饰器做了增强
就FastAPI的CBV实现,之前出了篇文章。做了个简单的实现方法。
今天逛github发现有牛人造了个FastAPI的tools包。
里面有关于CBV的实现,这位对于反射的理解让我非常佩服。抽空在其代码上做了点简化。因为并非自己原创,不好意思贴回github。在此贴出。
首先我加了个CBV专用的Router类,可以被APIRouter所include。
class CBVRouter(Router):
def __init__(
self,
app: FastAPI,
path: str,
group_name: str,
tags: Optional[List[str]] = None,
description: Optional[str] = None,
summary: Optional[str] = None,
routes: Optional[List[routing.BaseRoute]] = None,
redirect_slashes: bool = True,
default: Optional[ASGIApp] = None,
dependency_overrides_provider: Optional[Any] = None,
route_class: Type[APIRoute] = APIRoute,
default_response_class: Optional[Type[Response]] = None,
on_startup: Optional[Sequence[Callable]] = None,
on_shutdown: Optional[Sequence[Callable]] = None,
) -> None:
"""
:param app: FastAPI的APP
:param group_name: 配置一个CBV的方法们独有的名字,方便标识。
:param path: 整合参数,只能在此输入,必填
:param tags: 整合参数,默认值是group_name
:param description: 整合参数,只能在此输入
:param summary: 整合参数,只能在此输入,默认值是group_name_方法名
"""
super().__init__(
routes=routes,
redirect_slashes=redirect_slashes,
default=default,
on_startup=on_startup,
on_shutdown=on_shutdown,
)
self.dependency_overrides_provider = dependency_overrides_provider
self.route_class = route_class
self.default_response_class = default_response_class
self.app = app
self.path = path
self.name = group_name
self.tags = tags or [group_name]
self.description = description
self.summary = summary
def method(
self,
response_model: Optional[Type[Any]] = None,
status_code: int = 200,
summary: Optional[str] = None,
tags: Optional[List[str]] = [],
response_description: str = "Successful Response",
dependencies: Optional[Sequence[params.Depends]] = None,
responses: Optional[Dict[Union[int, str], Dict[str, Any]]] = None,
deprecated: Optional[bool] = None,
response_model_include: Optional[Union[SetIntStr, DictIntStrAny]] = None,
response_model_exclude: Optional[Union[SetIntStr, DictIntStrAny]] = None,
response_model_by_alias: bool = True,
response_model_exclude_unset: bool = False,
response_model_exclude_defaults: bool = False,
response_model_exclude_none: bool = False,
include_in_schema: bool = True,
response_class: Optional[Type[Response]] = None,
name: Optional[str] = None,
callbacks: Optional[List[APIRoute]] = None,
) -> Callable:
def decorator(func: Callable) -> Callable:
method = getattr(func, "__name__", None)
assert method, "装饰器使用方式错误"
assert method in ['get', 'post', 'put', 'delete', 'options', 'head', 'patch', 'trace'],
"请将方法名配置为' HTTP METHOD '中的一个"
tags.extend(self.tags)
route_class = self.route_class
route = route_class(
self.path,
endpoint=func,
response_model=response_model,
status_code=status_code,
tags=tags,
description=self.description,
methods=[method],
operation_id=f'{self.name}_{self.path[1:]}_{method}',
summary=summary or f'{self.name} _ {method}',
dependencies=dependencies,
deprecated=deprecated,
response_description=response_description,
responses=responses or {},
response_model_include=response_model_include,
response_model_exclude=response_model_exclude,
response_model_by_alias=response_model_by_alias,
response_model_exclude_unset=response_model_exclude_unset,
response_model_exclude_defaults=response_model_exclude_defaults,
response_model_exclude_none=response_model_exclude_none,
include_in_schema=include_in_schema,
response_class=response_class or self.default_response_class,
name=name,
dependency_overrides_provider=self.dependency_overrides_provider,
callbacks=callbacks,
)
self.routes.append(route)
return func
return decorator
-
method
是替代@app.get
等八个方法的装饰器,具体是什么方法取决于函数名。
@router.method()
def get(self):
-----------------------------
@app.get(path)
def xxx():
即上述两者是等价的
-
__init__
对部分属性进行了整合,不必在装饰器里输入。因为cbv的方法之间是具有部分共性的。例如tags之类的。
接下来的部分是对原代码的小修改
T = TypeVar("T")
def API(item: object):
"""
我们为了灵活性,设立了主动和被动两种模式。
主动模式代表,将FastAPI的app传入到router,router自动实现挂载。
# app = FastAPI()
# @CBV
# class TestClass:
# router = CBVRouter(app=app, path="/user", group_name="User")
如果本模块是启动的主模块,这样是一个好的选择。
被动模式代表,提供router,包含app的主模块import这个router,交由它们去处理!
这样我们不再期待获得app,并且我们需要暴露一个router
# router = CBVRouter(path="/user", group_name="User")
# @CBV(router)
# class TestClass:
这样我认为是一个比较好的方式。所以主动与被动的最大区别是写法。
故这个装饰器,包含两种使用方式: @CBV 与 @CBV(router)
:param item: 可能代表router或者decorator传入的cls
:return: 一个decorator,或者一个cls
"""
if isinstance(item, CBVRouter):
router = item
def decorator(cls: Type[T]):
_get_method(cls, router)
return cls
return decorator
# --------要求配置Router以及指定App--------
else:
cls = item
router = None
for attr in cls.__dict__.values():
if isinstance(attr, CBVRouter):
router = attr
assert router, "请配置一个Router到类属性router"
app = getattr(router, 'app')
assert app, "请指定要挂载的app"
_get_method(cls, router)
app.include_router(router)
return cls
def _get_method(cls, router):
"""抽离的公共代码"""
# ------------修改__init__签名------------
update_cbv_class_init(cls)
# ----------------抓取方法----------------
function_members = inspect.getmembers(cls, inspect.isfunction)
functions_set = set(func for _, func in function_members)
def temp(r):
if isinstance(r, (Route, WebSocketRoute)) and r.endpoint in functions_set:
_update_endpoint_self_param(cls, r)
return True
return False
router.routes = list(filter(temp, router.routes))
def update_cbv_class_init(cls: Type[Any]) -> None:
"""
重定义类的__init__(), 更新签名和参数
"""
CBV_CLASS_KEY = "__cbv_class__"
if getattr(cls, CBV_CLASS_KEY, False):
return # Already initialized
old_init: Callable[..., Any] = cls.__init__
old_signature = inspect.signature(old_init)
old_parameters = list(old_signature.parameters.values())[1:]
new_parameters = [
x for x in old_parameters
if x.kind not in
(inspect.Parameter.VAR_POSITIONAL, inspect.Parameter.VAR_KEYWORD)
]
dependency_names: List[str] = []
for name, hint in get_type_hints(cls).items():
if is_classvar(hint):
continue
parameter_kwargs = {"default": getattr(cls, name, Ellipsis)}
dependency_names.append(name)
new_parameters.append(
inspect.Parameter(
name=name,
kind=inspect.Parameter.KEYWORD_ONLY,
annotation=hint,
**parameter_kwargs
)
)
new_signature = old_signature.replace(parameters=new_parameters)
def new_init(self: Any, *args: Any, **kwargs: Any) -> None:
for dep_name in dependency_names:
dep_value = kwargs.pop(dep_name)
setattr(self, dep_name, dep_value)
old_init(self, *args, **kwargs)
setattr(cls, "__signature__", new_signature)
setattr(cls, "__init__", new_init)
setattr(cls, CBV_CLASS_KEY, True)
def _update_endpoint_self_param(cls: Type[Any], route: Union[Route, WebSocketRoute]) -> None:
"""
调整endpoint的self参数,使其变为self=Depends(cls)
这样每次处理依赖时,就可以实例化一个对象
"""
old_endpoint = route.endpoint
old_signature = inspect.signature(old_endpoint)
old_parameters: List[inspect.Parameter] = list(old_signature.parameters.values())
old_first_parameter = old_parameters[0]
new_first_parameter = old_first_parameter.replace(default=Depends(cls))
new_parameters = [new_first_parameter] + [
parameter.replace(kind=inspect.Parameter.KEYWORD_ONLY) for parameter in old_parameters[1:]
]
new_signature = old_signature.replace(parameters=new_parameters)
setattr(route.endpoint, "__signature__", new_signature)
使用示例
主动方式:
-
CBV类使用
@API
装饰器 -
在类属性中建一个
CBVRouter
类的实例 (名字随意,会根据类型搜索) -
app, path, group_name
三者是必填参数,因为这次没用metaclass拿不到类名,所以要自己指定个名字,方便api文档来标识。 -
可以定义
__init__
,它最终会在endpoint中以(self=Depends(cls), ...)
方式提供,这类似于spring的依赖注入。 -
可以在类属性中添加参数(包括Depends()),他们最终会被整合到
__init__
的参数中 -
我们我们可以理解为,从类中的一个方法,变成Depends一个类实例的函数。
def dependency(num: int) -> int:
return num
app = FastAPI()
@API
class TestClass:
router = CBVRouter(app, path="/user", group_name="User")
x: int = Depends(dependency)
cx: ClassVar[int] = 1
cy: ClassVar[int]
def __init__(self, z: int = Depends(dependency)):
self.y = 1
self.z = z
@router.method(response_model=int)
def get(self) -> int:
return self.cx + self.x + self.y + self.z
@router.method(response_model=bool)
def post(self) -> bool:
return hasattr(self, "cy")
@router.method()
def put(self):
return {"msg": "put"}
@router.method()
def delete(self):
return {"msg": "delete"}
被动方式
- 方便被其他位置引入挂载
router = CBVRouter(path="/user", group_name="User")
@API(router)
class TestClass:
x: int = Depends(dependency)
cx: ClassVar[int] = 1
cy: ClassVar[int]
......
successful
能够正确发现依赖
网友评论