行为参数化

假设有如下业务：有一堆有颜色和重量的苹果，我需要通过颜色和重量取出相应苹果
定义苹果

    public class Apple {
        private int weight = 0;
        private String color = "";

        public Apple(int weight, String color){
            this.weight = weight;
            this.color = color;
        }

        public Integer getWeight() {
            return weight;
        }

        public void setWeight(Integer weight) {
            this.weight = weight;
        }

        public String getColor() {
            return color;
        }

        public void setColor(String color) {
            this.color = color;
        }

        public String toString() {
            return "Apple{" +
                    "color='" + color + '\'' +
                    ", weight=" + weight +
                    '}';
        }
    }

假设

inventory = Arrays.asList(new Apple(80,"green"), new Apple(155, "green"), new Apple(120, "red"));

解决方案1:

List<Apple> result = new ArrayList<>();
        for(Apple apple: inventory){
            if("green".equals(apple.getColor())){
                result.add(apple);
            }
        }

这是最常见的方法。但是这样的结构很难复用。比如我颜色不确定呢？

解决方案2:

        List<Apple> result = new ArrayList<>();
        for(Apple apple: inventory){
            if(apple.getColor().equals(color)){
                result.add(apple);
            }
        }

如果我需要100g以上的且红色的苹果我就需要

        List<Apple> result = new ArrayList<>();
        for(Apple apple: inventory){
            if(apple.getColor().equals(color) 
                            && apple.getWeight() > weight){
                result.add(apple);
            }
        }

如果我需要100g以上或者红色的苹果

        List<Apple> result = new ArrayList<>();
        for(Apple apple: inventory){
            if(apple.getColor().equals(color) 
                            || apple.getWeight() > weight){
                result.add(apple);
            }
        }

是不是变得没完没了了？
解决方案3:

public static List<Apple> filterApples(List<Apple> inventory, ApplePredicate p){
        List<Apple> result = new ArrayList<>();
        for(Apple apple : inventory){
            if(p.test(apple)){
                result.add(apple);
            }
        }
        return result;
    }

    interface ApplePredicate{
        boolean test(Apple a);
    }
     class AppleWeightPredicate implements ApplePredicate{
        public boolean test(Apple apple){
            return apple.getWeight() > 150;
        }
    }
     class AppleColorPredicate implements ApplePredicate{
        public boolean test(Apple apple){
            return "green".equals(apple.getColor());
        }
    }

     class AppleRedAndHeavyPredicate implements ApplePredicate{
        public boolean test(Apple apple){
            return "red".equals(apple.getColor())
                    && apple.getWeight() > 150;
        }
    }

List<Apple> greenApples2 = filterApples(inventory, new AppleColorPredicate());

这种方法和合适。不过如果规则也是不确定的呢？

解决方案4:

        List<Apple> redApples2 = filterApples(inventory, new ApplePredicate() {
            public boolean test(Apple a){
                return a.getColor().equals("red");
            }
        });

Good!这样就能做到定制化了。不过通过lambda写起来更加优美

解决方案5:

        List<Apple> redApples2 = filterApples(inventory, (Apple a)-> a.getColor().equals("red"));
        

如果我们要推广。不只是苹果而是所有的判断规则？

解决方案6:

    interface Predicate<T>{
        boolean test(T t);
    }

    public static <T> List<T> filter(List<T> inventory, Predicate<T> p){
        List<T> result = new ArrayList<>();
        for(T apple : inventory){
            if(p.test(apple)){
                result.add(apple);
            }
        }
        return result;
    }
        

List<Apple> redApples2 = filter(inventory, (Apple a)-> a.getColor().equals("red"));

其实java 8 的思路也是这样的
解决方案7:

        List<Apple> redApples2 = inventory
                .stream()
                .filter((Apple a)-> a.getColor().equals("red"))
                .collect(Collectors.toList());