美文网首页
2022-05-27(250)Engineering law a

2022-05-27(250)Engineering law a

作者: 木金木水火土的木 | 来源:发表于2022-05-27 11:00 被阅读0次

5. REMEDIES FOR WRONGFUL ORDER TO REMOVE EMPLOYEES. If the engineer without justification orders an employee to be removed, the contractor may disobey the order and contest forfeiture if the engineer acts under cl. 63. Alternatively he may claim damages, but apart from other difficulties (pp. 417–18) it may be difficult to prove tangible loss beyond the wages of a substitute (and that only if the contractor cannot make full use elsewhere of the services of the employee dismissed), however valuable the employee may be to the contractor’s organisation.

It is conceivable, but doubtful, that the contractor may have a remedy under cl. 13 for any resulting delay or disruption to the contractor’s arrangements—p. 75.

The man dismissed from the site (apart from any rights he may have against his employer, which are not relevant here) will have a right of action for defamation against the engineer, since the order implies that he has misconducted himself or been incompetent or negligent, if the engineer acted maliciously, i.e. out of spite or other ulterior motive, but not if the engineer was merely mistaken.

6. REMOVAL OF PARTNER, SUB-CONTRACTOR, DIRECTOR. The engineer may have power under this clause to order removal from the works of a partner in a contracting firm, or of a sub-contractor himself, although neither is a servant of the main contractor, if “employ” is to be read in the wide sense of “make use of”. Nominated sub-contractors are dealt with fully in ch. 6. A director whether or not an employee of a contracting company may also be removable under this clause, as may an independent consultant employed by the contractor in or about the execution of the works. k′

7. SAFETY. This specific reference to safety is new, and ties in with the new cl. 19.

The case of a workman who is careless only of his own safety is included.

If dismissal of a worker in the interests of safety causes a strike, the contractor may be entitled to an extension of time under cl. 44, given the irrational attitude of unions to justify safety measures.

相关文章

网友评论

      本文标题:2022-05-27(250)Engineering law a

      本文链接:https://www.haomeiwen.com/subject/mrsmprtx.html