转载请以链接形式标明出处:
本文出自:103style的博客
Base on RxJava 2.X
简介
RxJava 的 Schedulers
提供了以下五种 Scheduler
(调度器):
static {
SINGLE = RxJavaPlugins.initSingleScheduler(new SingleTask());
COMPUTATION = RxJavaPlugins.initComputationScheduler(new ComputationTask());
IO = RxJavaPlugins.initIoScheduler(new IOTask());
NEW_THREAD = RxJavaPlugins.initNewThreadScheduler(new NewThreadTask());
TRAMPOLINE = TrampolineScheduler.instance();
}
以 Schedulers.single()
为例介绍
如果我们没有调用 setInitXXSchedulerHandler
或者 setXXSchedulerHandler
自己实现调度器的话(XX
代表上面除了 TRAMPOLINE
的四种调度器的名字),我们开发中用到的 Schedulers.io();
Schedulers.computation();
Schedulers.newThread();
Schedulers.single();
实际上就是对应的 XXTask
的 call()
方法返回的 Scheduler
对象,即对应的 XXScheduler
对象。
public static void setInitSingleSchedulerHandler(@Nullable Function<? super Callable<Scheduler>, ? extends Scheduler> handler) {
if (lockdown) {
throw new IllegalStateException("Plugins can't be changed anymore");
}
onInitSingleHandler = handler;
}
public static void setSingleSchedulerHandler(@Nullable Function<? super Scheduler, ? extends Scheduler> handler) {
if (lockdown) {
throw new IllegalStateException("Plugins can't be changed anymore");
}
onSingleHandler = handler;
}
以下是 Schedulers.single()
的源码介绍:
-
onSingleScheduler()
中的onSingleHandler
是通过setSingleSchedulerHandler()
设置的,默认为Null
,所以即返回SINGLE
。public static Scheduler single() { return RxJavaPlugins.onSingleScheduler(SINGLE); } public static Scheduler onSingleScheduler(@NonNull Scheduler defaultScheduler) { Function<? super Scheduler, ? extends Scheduler> f = onSingleHandler; if (f == null) { return defaultScheduler; } return apply(f, defaultScheduler); }
-
SINGLE
是静态常量,通过RxJavaPlugins.initSingleScheduler(new SingleTask());
初始化。static final Scheduler SINGLE; static { SINGLE = RxJavaPlugins.initSingleScheduler(new SingleTask()); ... }
-
initSingleScheduler()
中的onInitSingleHandler
是通过setInitSingleSchedulerHandler()
设置的,默认为Null
,所以即调用callRequireNonNull(new SingleTask())
。public static Scheduler initSingleScheduler(@NonNull Callable<Scheduler> defaultScheduler) { ObjectHelper.requireNonNull(defaultScheduler, "Scheduler Callable can't be null"); Function<? super Callable<Scheduler>, ? extends Scheduler> f = onInitSingleHandler; if (f == null) { return callRequireNonNull(defaultScheduler); } return applyRequireNonNull(f, defaultScheduler); }
-
callRequireNonNull(new SingleTask())
即返回SingleTask
对象的call
方法。static Scheduler callRequireNonNull(@NonNull Callable<Scheduler> s) { try { return ObjectHelper.requireNonNull(s.call(), "Scheduler Callable result can't be null"); } catch (Throwable ex) { throw ExceptionHelper.wrapOrThrow(ex); } } static final class SingleTask implements Callable<Scheduler> { @Override public Scheduler call() throws Exception { return SingleHolder.DEFAULT; } }
- 即创建了一个
SingleScheduler
对象。static final class SingleHolder { static final Scheduler DEFAULT = new SingleScheduler(); }
所以 Schedulers.single()
实际返回的是 SingleScheduler
对象.
同样的:
Schedulers.io();
实际返回的是 IoScheduler
对象
Schedulers.computation();
实际返回的是 ComputationScheduler
对象
Schedulers.newThread();
实际返回的是 NewThreadScheduler
对象
SingleScheduler
源码介绍
public final class SingleScheduler extends Scheduler {
final ThreadFactory threadFactory;
final AtomicReference<ScheduledExecutorService> executor = new AtomicReference<ScheduledExecutorService>();
private static final String KEY_SINGLE_PRIORITY = "rx2.single-priority";
private static final String THREAD_NAME_PREFIX = "RxSingleScheduler";
static final RxThreadFactory SINGLE_THREAD_FACTORY;
static final ScheduledExecutorService SHUTDOWN;
static {
SHUTDOWN = Executors.newScheduledThreadPool(0);
SHUTDOWN.shutdown();
int priority = Math.max(Thread.MIN_PRIORITY, Math.min(Thread.MAX_PRIORITY,
Integer.getInteger(KEY_SINGLE_PRIORITY, Thread.NORM_PRIORITY)));
SINGLE_THREAD_FACTORY = new RxThreadFactory(THREAD_NAME_PREFIX, priority, true);//1.1
}
public SingleScheduler() { //1.0
this(SINGLE_THREAD_FACTORY);
}
public SingleScheduler(ThreadFactory threadFactory) {//2.0
this.threadFactory = threadFactory;
executor.lazySet(createExecutor(threadFactory));//4.0
}
static ScheduledExecutorService createExecutor(ThreadFactory threadFactory) {//3.0
return SchedulerPoolFactory.create(threadFactory);
}
...
}
-
(1.0)
默认的构造方法,传入了一个SINGLE_THREAD_FACTORY
的静态常量。(1.1)
我们可以看到它是在初始化为new RxThreadFactory("RxSingleScheduler", 5 , true);
即为 线程名称前缀 为RxSingleScheduler
,优先级为5 不阻塞 的RxThreadFactory
对象。 -
(2.0)
然后设置当前的threadFactory
为此RxThreadFactory
对象。 -
(3.0)
然后通过SchedulerPoolFactory.create(threadFactory)
创建了一个执行者。
(3.1)
即通过Executors.newScheduledThreadPool(1, factory)
创建了一个核心线程数为1
的ScheduledExecutorService
(调度线程池)。
(3.2)
并将ScheduledExecutorService
放进SchedulerPoolFactory
的key
为ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor
的Map
集合POOLS
中。// Upcast to the Map interface here to avoid 8.x compatibility issues. // See http://stackoverflow.com/a/32955708/61158 //这个用map接口是为了解决java8的一个bug,具体可以点击上面的链接查看 static final Map<ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor, Object> POOLS = new ConcurrentHashMap<ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor, Object>(); public static ScheduledExecutorService create(ThreadFactory factory) { final ScheduledExecutorService exec = Executors.newScheduledThreadPool(1, factory);//3.1 tryPutIntoPool(PURGE_ENABLED, exec); return exec; } static void tryPutIntoPool(boolean purgeEnabled, ScheduledExecutorService exec) { if (purgeEnabled && exec instanceof ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor) { ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor e = (ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor) exec; POOLS.put(e, exec);//3.2 } }
-
(4.0)
然后 将AtomicReference<ScheduledExecutorService>
对象executor
的value
设置为上面创建的ScheduledExecutorService
。
我们之前在 Rxjava之timer和interval操作符源码解析 介绍过 timer
操作符在订阅的时候会执行ObservableTimer
的 subscribeActual
方法,
public void subscribeActual(Observer<? super Long> observer) {
TimerObserver ios = new TimerObserver(observer);
observer.onSubscribe(ios);
Disposable d = scheduler.scheduleDirect(ios, delay, unit);
ios.setResource(d);
}
其中的 scheduler.scheduleDirect(ios, delay, unit)
中 会通过createWorker()
创建一个 Worker
。
public Disposable scheduleDirect(@NonNull Runnable run, long delay, @NonNull TimeUnit unit) {
final Worker w = createWorker(); //
final Runnable decoratedRun = RxJavaPlugins.onSchedule(run);
DisposeTask task = new DisposeTask(decoratedRun, w);
w.schedule(task, delay, unit);
return task;
}
-
我们来看看
SingleScheduler
的createWorker()
:public Worker createWorker() { return new ScheduledWorker(executor.get()); } static final class ScheduledWorker extends Scheduler.Worker { final ScheduledExecutorService executor; final CompositeDisposable tasks; ScheduledWorker(ScheduledExecutorService executor) { this.executor = executor; this.tasks = new CompositeDisposable(); } ... }
- 通过
executor.get()
获取AtomicReference
的value
值,通过上面的SingleScheduler
源码(4.0)
的介绍,即获取到的是核心线程数为1
的ScheduledExecutorService
。 - 然后将其赋值给
ScheduledWorker
的executor
。
- 通过
-
然后我们看看
w.schedule(task, delay, unit)
:public Disposable schedule(@NonNull Runnable run, long delay, @NonNull TimeUnit unit) { if (disposed) { return EmptyDisposable.INSTANCE; } Runnable decoratedRun = RxJavaPlugins.onSchedule(run); ScheduledRunnable sr = new ScheduledRunnable(decoratedRun, tasks); tasks.add(sr); try { Future<?> f; if (delay <= 0L) { f = executor.submit((Callable<Object>)sr); } else { f = executor.schedule((Callable<Object>)sr, delay, unit); } sr.setFuture(f); } catch (RejectedExecutionException ex) { dispose(); RxJavaPlugins.onError(ex); return EmptyDisposable.INSTANCE; } return sr; }
- 首先校验
disposed
的状态,true
就直接返回EmptyDisposable.INSTANCE
。Rxjava之timer和interval操作符源码解析 中介绍的interval
操作符里schedulePeriodicallyDirect
中会校验这个返回值。 - 然后构建了也给
ScheduledRunnable
对象(继承自AtomicReferenceArray
)。
将传递进来的Runnable
对象赋值给actual
。
将tasks
赋值给AtomicReferenceArray
的长度为3
的array
的第一个索引位置。public ScheduledRunnable(Runnable actual, DisposableContainer parent) { super(3); this.actual = actual; this.lazySet(0, parent); }
-
tasks.add(sr)
即把ScheduledRunnable
添加到OpenHashSet<Disposable>
的resources
集合中,在调用dispose()
的时候去清空这个集合。public void dispose() { if (!disposed) { disposed = true; tasks.dispose(); } }
- 然后把这个任务丢给线程池去执行:以
timer
操作符为例,线程池执行任务即为执行ObservableTimer
中TimerObserver
的run
方法。//ObservableTimer public void subscribeActual(Observer<? super Long> observer) { TimerObserver ios = new TimerObserver(observer); observer.onSubscribe(ios); Disposable d = scheduler.scheduleDirect(ios, delay, unit); ios.setResource(d); } //ScheduledRunnable public void run() { lazySet(THREAD_INDEX, Thread.currentThread());//1.0 try { try { actual.run(); } catch (Throwable e) { // Exceptions.throwIfFatal(e); nowhere to go RxJavaPlugins.onError(e); } } finally { lazySet(THREAD_INDEX, null);//1.1 Object o = get(PARENT_INDEX);//2.0 if (o != PARENT_DISPOSED && compareAndSet(PARENT_INDEX, o, DONE) && o != null) { ((DisposableContainer)o).delete(this);//2.1 } for (;;) { o = get(FUTURE_INDEX);//3.0 if (o == SYNC_DISPOSED || o == ASYNC_DISPOSED || compareAndSet(FUTURE_INDEX, o, DONE)) { break; } } } }
-
(1.0)
保存当前执行任务的线程,(1.1)
置空当前执行任务的线程。 -
(2.0)
获取上面设置的CompositeDisposable
对象。(2.2)
去删除OpenHashSet<Disposable> resources
中执行完成的任务。 -
(3.0)
直到任务执行完成或者被取消才结束。
-
- 返回的
Future
对象,被赋值给ScheduledRunnable
中array
的第二个位置。static final int PARENT_INDEX = 0; static final int FUTURE_INDEX = 1; static final int THREAD_INDEX = 2; public void setFuture(Future<?> f) { for (;;) { Object o = get(FUTURE_INDEX); if (o == DONE) { return; } if (o == SYNC_DISPOSED) { f.cancel(false); return; } if (o == ASYNC_DISPOSED) { f.cancel(true); return; } if (compareAndSet(FUTURE_INDEX, o, f)) { return; } } }
- 首先校验
NewThreadScheduler 源码介绍
和SingleScheduler
类似NewThreadScheduler
也是构建了一个核心线程数为1
的ScheduledExecutorService
。
区别就是 NewThreadScheduler
每次调用 Schedulers.newThread()
都是重新创建了一个新的线程池, 不需要去记录之前运行的任务,每个任务之前不会有什么关联,所以使用得时候要注意。
以下代码是 NewThreadWorker
的 scheduleDirect
方法:
public Disposable scheduleDirect(final Runnable run, long delayTime, TimeUnit unit) {
ScheduledDirectTask task = new ScheduledDirectTask(RxJavaPlugins.onSchedule(run));
try {
Future<?> f;
if (delayTime <= 0L) {
f = executor.submit(task);
} else {
f = executor.schedule(task, delayTime, unit);
}
task.setFuture(f);
return task;
} catch (RejectedExecutionException ex) {
RxJavaPlugins.onError(ex);
return EmptyDisposable.INSTANCE;
}
}
ScheduledDirectTask
:执行任务的返回值为 null
。
public final class ScheduledDirectTask extends AbstractDirectTask implements Callable<Void> {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1811839108042568751L;
public ScheduledDirectTask(Runnable runnable) {
super(runnable);
}
@Override
public Void call() throws Exception {
runner = Thread.currentThread();
try {
runnable.run();
} finally {
lazySet(FINISHED);
runner = null;
}
return null;
}
}
ComputationScheduler 源码介绍
ComputationScheduler
在Rxjava之timer和interval操作符源码解析 中已经介绍过,就不再赘述了。
IoScheduler 源码介绍
- 首先我们看看构造函数做了些什么:
private static final TimeUnit KEEP_ALIVE_UNIT = TimeUnit.SECONDS; static { KEEP_ALIVE_TIME = Long.getLong(KEY_KEEP_ALIVE_TIME, KEEP_ALIVE_TIME_DEFAULT); SHUTDOWN_THREAD_WORKER = new ThreadWorker(new RxThreadFactory("RxCachedThreadSchedulerShutdown")); SHUTDOWN_THREAD_WORKER.dispose(); int priority = Math.max(Thread.MIN_PRIORITY, Math.min(Thread.MAX_PRIORITY, Integer.getInteger(KEY_IO_PRIORITY, Thread.NORM_PRIORITY))); WORKER_THREAD_FACTORY = new RxThreadFactory(WORKER_THREAD_NAME_PREFIX, priority); EVICTOR_THREAD_FACTORY = new RxThreadFactory(EVICTOR_THREAD_NAME_PREFIX, priority); NONE = new CachedWorkerPool(0, null, WORKER_THREAD_FACTORY);//1.0 NONE.shutdown(); } static final class CachedWorkerPool implements Runnable { private final long keepAliveTime; private final ConcurrentLinkedQueue<ThreadWorker> expiringWorkerQueue; final CompositeDisposable allWorkers; private final ScheduledExecutorService evictorService; private final Future<?> evictorTask; private final ThreadFactory threadFactory; CachedWorkerPool(long keepAliveTime, TimeUnit unit, ThreadFactory threadFactory) { this.keepAliveTime = unit != null ? unit.toNanos(keepAliveTime) : 0L; this.expiringWorkerQueue = new ConcurrentLinkedQueue<ThreadWorker>(); this.allWorkers = new CompositeDisposable(); this.threadFactory = threadFactory; ScheduledExecutorService evictor = null; Future<?> task = null; if (unit != null) { evictor = Executors.newScheduledThreadPool(1, EVICTOR_THREAD_FACTORY); task = evictor.scheduleWithFixedDelay(this, this.keepAliveTime, this.keepAliveTime, TimeUnit.NANOSECONDS); } evictorService = evictor; evictorTask = task; } ... void shutdown() { allWorkers.dispose(); if (evictorTask != null) { evictorTask.cancel(true); } if (evictorService != null) { evictorService.shutdownNow(); } } } public IoScheduler() { this(WORKER_THREAD_FACTORY); } public IoScheduler(ThreadFactory threadFactory) { this.threadFactory = threadFactory; this.pool = new AtomicReference<CachedWorkerPool>(NONE); start(); } @Override public void start() { CachedWorkerPool update = new CachedWorkerPool(KEEP_ALIVE_TIME, KEEP_ALIVE_UNIT, threadFactory); if (!pool.compareAndSet(NONE, update)) { update.shutdown(); } }
-
(1.0)
首先构造了一个CachedWorkerPool
。 -
(2.0)
将构造的CachedWorkerPool
设置为AtomicReference
的value
的值。 -
(3.0)
构造了一个CachedWorkerPool(60, TimeUnit.SECONDS, new RxThreadFactory(WORKER_THREAD_NAME_PREFIX, priority))
,(3.1)
即创建了evictorService
为核心线程数为1
的ScheduledExecutorService
的CachedWorkerPool
对象。 -
(4.0)
更新AtomicReference
的value
的值为(3.0)
构造的CachedWorkerPool
,!pool.compareAndSet(NONE, update)
不成立。
-
-
接下来我们看看
createWorker()
:public Worker createWorker() { return new EventLoopWorker(pool.get());//1.0 } static final class EventLoopWorker extends Scheduler.Worker { private final CompositeDisposable tasks; private final CachedWorkerPool pool; private final ThreadWorker threadWorker; final AtomicBoolean once = new AtomicBoolean(); EventLoopWorker(CachedWorkerPool pool) { this.pool = pool; this.tasks = new CompositeDisposable(); this.threadWorker = pool.get();//2.0 } .... }
-
(1.0)
pool.get()
返回的即是evictorService
为核心线程数为1
的ScheduledExecutorService
的CachedWorkerPool
对象。 -
(2.0)
调用CachedWorkerPool
对象的get()
获取ThreadWorker
。
(2.1)
expiringWorkerQueue
初始化为空,所以不成立。
(2.2)
所以get()
返回的是一个new ThreadWorker(new RxThreadFactory("RxCachedThreadScheduler", 5))
。ThreadWorker get() { if (allWorkers.isDisposed()) { return SHUTDOWN_THREAD_WORKER; } while (!expiringWorkerQueue.isEmpty()) { //2.1 ThreadWorker threadWorker = expiringWorkerQueue.poll(); if (threadWorker != null) { return threadWorker; } } // No cached worker found, so create a new one. ThreadWorker w = new ThreadWorker(threadFactory);//2.2 allWorkers.add(w); return w; }
-
-
接下来我们看看
EventLoopWorker
的schedule()
:public Disposable schedule(@NonNull Runnable action, long delayTime, @NonNull TimeUnit unit) { if (tasks.isDisposed()) { // don't schedule, we are unsubscribed return EmptyDisposable.INSTANCE; } return threadWorker.scheduleActual(action, delayTime, unit, tasks); }
- 在
createWorker()
中我们知到threadWorker
即为new ThreadWorker(new RxThreadFactory("RxCachedThreadScheduler", 5))
。
- 在
-
接下来我们看看
ThreadWorker
继承自NewThreadWorker
的scheduleActual(...)
:public ScheduledRunnable scheduleActual(final Runnable run, long delayTime, @NonNull TimeUnit unit, @Nullable DisposableContainer parent) { Runnable decoratedRun = RxJavaPlugins.onSchedule(run); ScheduledRunnable sr = new ScheduledRunnable(decoratedRun, parent); if (parent != null) { if (!parent.add(sr)) { return sr; } } Future<?> f; try { if (delayTime <= 0) { f = executor.submit((Callable<Object>)sr); } else { f = executor.schedule((Callable<Object>)sr, delayTime, unit); } sr.setFuture(f); } catch (RejectedExecutionException ex) { if (parent != null) { parent.remove(sr); } RxJavaPlugins.onError(ex); } return sr; }
- 可以看到基本和
SingleScheduler
类似,就不再赘述了。
- 可以看到基本和
小结
Schedulers.single()
实际返回的是 SingleScheduler
。
Schedulers.io()
实际返回的是 IoScheduler
。
Schedulers.computation()
实际返回的是 ComputationScheduler
。
Schedulers.newThread()
实际返回的是 NewThreadScheduler
。
createWorker()
返回的值分别为:
Schedulers.single()
: ScheduledWorker
。
Schedulers.io()
:ThreadWorker
。
Schedulers.computation()
:PoolWorker
。
Schedulers.newThread()
:NewThreadWorker
。
SingleScheduler
、Schedulers.io()
、NewThreadScheduler
、Schedulers.computation()
最终都是通过 Executors.newScheduledThreadPool(1, factory);
构建的核心线程数为1
的线程池。
区别就是 Schedulers.newThread()
每次都是创建新的线程池, 而其他的都是服用之前已经创建得线程池!!! 所以要慎重选择。
以上
网友评论