二哈镇楼
笔者在实际开发中碰到的问题，在这里记录一下
描述一下 碰见的问题：在一个listview页面中，onResume()回来，请求完数据后，对adapter进行notifyDataSetChanged后，需要对item进行ui操作。这时候首先页面展现的时候，ListView 会getView()一遍，请求完数据notifyDataSetChanged后，又会getView(),这时候直接进行UI操作的话 在主线程中 会先执行UI操作，然后在进行getView ，就会导致我的进行UI操作后的item 又被重新getView了一遍。
图1
notifyDataSetChanged 异步机制
首先这个机制问题，不是直接在主线程中去更新UI，来看一下里面的代码
/**
* Notifies the attached observers that the underlying data has been changed
* and any View reflecting the data set should refresh itself.
*/
public void notifyDataSetChanged() {
mDataSetObservable.notifyChanged();
}
***
继续进入 DataSetObservable：
***
/**
* Invokes {@link DataSetObserver#onChanged} on each observer.
* Called when the contents of the data set have changed. The recipient
* will obtain the new contents the next time it queries the data set.
*/
public void notifyChanged() {
synchronized(mObservers) {
// since onChanged() is implemented by the app, it could do anything, including
// removing itself from {@link mObservers} - and that could cause problems if
// an iterator is used on the ArrayList {@link mObservers}.
// to avoid such problems, just march thru the list in the reverse order.
for (int i = mObservers.size() - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
mObservers.get(i).onChanged();
}
}
}
会调用观察者的onChanged()方法，它的实现方法在DataSetObservable的子类中AdapterDataSetObserver实现。而AdapterDataSetObserver则是在listview.setadapter 时候将AdapterDataSetObserver创建并且绑定，可以看一下setAdapter()方法
/**
* Sets the data behind this ListView.
*
* The adapter passed to this method may be wrapped by a {@link WrapperListAdapter},
* depending on the ListView features currently in use. For instance, adding
* headers and/or footers will cause the adapter to be wrapped.
*
* @param adapter The ListAdapter which is responsible for maintaining the
* data backing this list and for producing a view to represent an
* item in that data set.
*
* @see #getAdapter()
*/
@Override
public void setAdapter(ListAdapter adapter) {
if (mAdapter != null && mDataSetObserver != null) {
mAdapter.unregisterDataSetObserver(mDataSetObserver);
}
resetList();
mRecycler.clear();
if (mHeaderViewInfos.size() > 0 || mFooterViewInfos.size() > 0) {
mAdapter = new HeaderViewListAdapter(mHeaderViewInfos, mFooterViewInfos, adapter);
} else {
mAdapter = adapter;
}
mOldSelectedPosition = INVALID_POSITION;
mOldSelectedRowId = INVALID_ROW_ID;
// AbsListView#setAdapter will update choice mode states.
super.setAdapter(adapter);
if (mAdapter != null) {
mAreAllItemsSelectable = mAdapter.areAllItemsEnabled();
mOldItemCount = mItemCount;
mItemCount = mAdapter.getCount();
checkFocus();
mDataSetObserver = new AdapterDataSetObserver();
mAdapter.registerDataSetObserver(mDataSetObserver);
mRecycler.setViewTypeCount(mAdapter.getViewTypeCount());
int position;
if (mStackFromBottom) {
position = lookForSelectablePosition(mItemCount - 1, false);
} else {
position = lookForSelectablePosition(0, true);
}
setSelectedPositionInt(position);
setNextSelectedPositionInt(position);
if (mItemCount == 0) {
// Nothing selected
checkSelectionChanged();
}
} else {
mAreAllItemsSelectable = true;
checkFocus();
// Nothing selected
checkSelectionChanged();
}
requestLayout();
}
再看下AdapterDataSetObserver 中onChanged的实现
class AdapterDataSetObserver extends DataSetObserver {
private Parcelable mInstanceState = null;
@Override
public void onChanged() {
mDataChanged = true;
mOldItemCount = mItemCount;
mItemCount = getAdapter().getCount();
// Detect the case where a cursor that was previously invalidated has
// been repopulated with new data.
if (AdapterView.this.getAdapter().hasStableIds() && mInstanceState != null
&& mOldItemCount == 0 && mItemCount > 0) {
AdapterView.this.onRestoreInstanceState(mInstanceState);
mInstanceState = null;
} else {
rememberSyncState();
}
checkFocus();
requestLayout();
}
@Override
public void onInvalidated() {
mDataChanged = true;
if (AdapterView.this.getAdapter().hasStableIds()) {
// Remember the current state for the case where our hosting activity is being
// stopped and later restarted
mInstanceState = AdapterView.this.onSaveInstanceState();
}
// Data is invalid so we should reset our state
mOldItemCount = mItemCount;
mItemCount = 0;
mSelectedPosition = INVALID_POSITION;
mSelectedRowId = INVALID_ROW_ID;
mNextSelectedPosition = INVALID_POSITION;
mNextSelectedRowId = INVALID_ROW_ID;
mNeedSync = false;
checkFocus();
requestLayout();
}
这时候，才会调用view的requestLayout()放在主线程中重绘页面。所以notifyDataSetChanged调用的时候是异步调用观察者里的方法，然后push到主线程里去刷新UI。因此
notifyDataSetChanged之后直接对UI进行操作的话，view的UI操作会在绘制队列，才导致问题的关键
那如何解决问题呢
都只要view中有个方法Post(),将任务push到主线程队列中，意思也是将任务添加到消息队列中，保证在UI线程执行。从本质上说，它还是依赖于以Handler、Looper、MessageQueue、Message为基础的异步消息处理机制。大家一定多碰到过，在onCreate()里面去获取一个view的高宽度时候，往往得到的数值是0；也都知道原因，view要经过onMeasure、onLayout和onDraw三个过程，在onCreate()时候明显，view 还没有到onLayout，也就没有宽度。这时候只要进行view.Post(),将计算高宽的方法放置post里面，这样获取的就没问题了。可以看下post的源码：
public boolean post(Runnable action) {
final AttachInfo attachInfo = mAttachInfo;
if (attachInfo != null) {
return attachInfo.mHandler.post(action);
}
// Assume that post will succeed later
ViewRootImpl.getRunQueue().post(action);
return true;
}
原理就在view.Post()是将任务添加到这个view绘制结束后的消息队列中，保证了这个view绘制的优先性。受到了这个启发，我认为listview的adapter.ontifyDataSetchanged方法也是这样的道理，亲测将刷新UI操作放在listview.post()中进行操作，这时候打印出来的日志，就是我UI的操作在getview完成之后进行了。为了防止是因为异步的先后行，特的将getview次数增加到10次
图2
最后完美解决问题
网友评论