This article derived from Jan.2015 the economist. Because it is from the “science and technology” part, it is so unfamiliar and difficult for me to understand. That’s why I have spent more time and energy that others.
This article mainly demonstrated the discovery of evidence which used to prove the theory of cosmic inflation by the BICEP-2, but then the team behind Planck casts serious doubt on the BICEP-2 result and stated that the result was lack of preciseness. By the way, the author’s attitude is neutral and moreover he express a hopeful expectation that these two teams will work with each other one day.
Throughout the article, what the author said “ but science, ideally, proceeds by exactly this sort of good-faith argument and honourable squabbling until the weight of evidence forces one side to admit defeat” impressed me a lot, which I totally agree with this new definition of science.
网友评论