美文网首页
为什么重写equals()方法,必须重写hashCode()方法

为什么重写equals()方法,必须重写hashCode()方法

作者: sgy_j | 来源:发表于2020-03-06 21:03 被阅读0次

    为了弄清为什么重写equals()方法时,必须重写hashCode()方法,我们首先需要明确Object实现hashCode()返回值是什么?

        /**
         * Returns a hash code value for the object. This method is
         * supported for the benefit of hash tables such as those provided by
         * {@link java.util.HashMap}.
         * <p>
         * The general contract of {@code hashCode} is:
         * <ul>
         * <li>Whenever it is invoked on the same object more than once during
         *     an execution of a Java application, the {@code hashCode} method
         *     must consistently return the same integer, provided no information
         *     used in {@code equals} comparisons on the object is modified.
         *     This integer need not remain consistent from one execution of an
         *     application to another execution of the same application.
         * <li>If two objects are equal according to the {@code equals(Object)}
         *     method, then calling the {@code hashCode} method on each of
         *     the two objects must produce the same integer result.
         * <li>It is <em>not</em> required that if two objects are unequal
         *     according to the {@link java.lang.Object#equals(java.lang.Object)}
         *     method, then calling the {@code hashCode} method on each of the
         *     two objects must produce distinct integer results.  However, the
         *     programmer should be aware that producing distinct integer results
         *     for unequal objects may improve the performance of hash tables.
         * </ul>
         * <p>
         * As much as is reasonably practical, the hashCode method defined by
         * class {@code Object} does return distinct integers for distinct
         * objects. (This is typically implemented by converting the internal
         * address of the object into an integer, but this implementation
         * technique is not required by the
         * Java&trade; programming language.)
         *
         * @return  a hash code value for this object.
         * @see     java.lang.Object#equals(java.lang.Object)
         * @see     java.lang.System#identityHashCode
         */
        public native int hashCode();
    

    哈希码的通用约定如下:

    • 在java程序执行过程中,在一个对象没有被改变的前提下,无论这个对象被调用多少次,hashCode()方法都会返回相同的整数值。对象的哈希码没有必要在不同的程序中保持相同的值。
    • 如果两个对象使用equals()方法进行比较是等价的,那么这两个对象的hashCode()方法必须返回相同的值。
    • 如果两个对象使用equals()方法进行比较是不等价的,那么这两个对象的hashCode()方法返回值不必相同。但是,不等价的对象的hashCode()值不同的话可以提高哈希表的性能。

    hashCode()方法是一个native方法,它返回的是由对象存储地址转化得到的值。

    若重写equals()方法而不重写hashCode()方法,当两个对象使用equals()方法进行比较是等价的时,两个对象的hashCode()方法返回值是不想等的(两个对象的存储地址是不相同的),违背了哈希码通用约定第二条。

    下面的代码中,新建了两个等价的对象person1和person2,并将person1作为key存入HashMap中。我们希望将这两个对象当成一个key,在HashMap中取person2的时候可以返回键person1的value。由于只重写了equals()方法,而未重写hashCode()方法,实际返回值为null。

    public class Person {
        private int id;
        private String name;
        public Person(int id, String name) {
            this.id = id;
            this.name = name;
        }
        @Override
        public boolean equals(Object obj) {
            if (this.id == ((Person)obj).id)
                return true;
            return false;
        }
    }
    
    public class Test {
        public static void main(String[] args) {
            Person person1 = new Person(1, "Lisa");
            Person person2 = new Person(1, "Lisa");
            HashMap<Person, Integer> persons = new HashMap<>();
            persons.put(person1, 10);
            System.out.println(persons.get(person2));
        }
    }
    
    null
    

    String同时重写了equals()方法和hashCode()方法

    public class Test {
        public static void main(String[] args) {
            HashMap<String, Integer> strs = new HashMap<>();
            String str1 = new String("ddd");
            String str2 = new String("ddd");
            strs.put(str1, 10);
            System.out.println(strs.get(str2));
        }
    }
    
    10
    

    参考
    https://blog.csdn.net/changrj6/article/details/100043822

    相关文章

      网友评论

          本文标题:为什么重写equals()方法,必须重写hashCode()方法

          本文链接:https://www.haomeiwen.com/subject/gwynrhtx.html