App在后台久置后,再次从桌面或最近的任务列表唤醒时经常会发生崩溃,这往往是App在后台被系统杀死,再次恢复的时候遇到了问题,而在使用FragmentActivity+Fragment的时候会更加频繁。比如,如果Fragment没有提供默认构造方法,就会在重建的时候因为反射创建Fragment失败而崩溃,再比如,在onCreate里面new 一个FragmentDialog,并且show,被后台杀死后,再次唤醒的时候,就会show两个对话框,这是为什么?其实这就涉及了后台杀死及恢复的机制,其中涉及的知识点主要是FragmentActivity、ActivityManagerService、LowMemoryKiller机制、ActivityStack、Binder等一系列知识点。放在一篇文章里面可能会有些长,因此,Android后台杀死系列写了三篇。
本篇是Android后台杀死系列的第一篇,主要讲解在开发过程中,由于后台杀死涉及的一些崩溃,以及如何避免这些崩溃,还有就是简单的介绍一下onSaveInstanceState与onRestoreInstanceState执行时机与原理,这两个函数也是Android面试时常问的两个点,是比简单的启动模式Activity声明周期稍微更深入细致一些的地方,也通过这个点引入后台杀死及恢复原理。
FragmentActivity被后台杀死后恢复逻辑
当App被后台异常杀死后,再次点击icon,或者从最近任务列表进入的时候,系统会帮助恢复当时的场景,重新创建Activity,对于FragmentActivity,由于其中有Framgent,逻辑会相对再复杂一些,系统会首先重建被销毁的Fragment。
举个栗子
我们创建一个Activity,并且在onCreate函数中新建并show一个DialogFragment,之后通过某种方式将APP异常杀死RogueKiller模拟后台杀死工具,再次从最近的任务唤起App的时候,会发现显示了两个DialogFragment,代码如下:
public class DialogFragmentActivity extends AppCompatActivity {
@Override
protected void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) {
super.onCreate(savedInstanceState);
DialogFragment dialogFragment = new FragmentDlg();
dialogFragment.show(getSupportFragmentManager(), "");
}
这不仅让我们奇怪,为什么呢?虽然被杀死了,但是onCreate函数在执行的时候还是只执行了一次啊,为什么会出现两个DialogFragment,这里其实就有一个DialogFragment是通过Android自身的恢复重建机制重建出来,在异常杀死的情况下onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState)函数的savedInstanceState参数也不是null,而是包含了被杀死时所保存的场景信息。再来看个崩溃的例子,新建一个CrashFragment,并且丢弃默认无参构造方法:
public class CrashFragment extends Fragment {
public CrashFragment(String tag) {
super();
}
}
之后再Activity中Add或replace添加这个CrashFragment,在CrashFragment显示后,通过RogueKiller模拟后台杀死工具模拟后台杀死,再次从最近任务列表里唤起App的时候,就会遇到崩溃,
Caused by: android.support.v4.app.Fragment$InstantiationException:
Unable to instantiate fragment xxx.CrashFragment:
make sure class name exists, is public, and has an empty constructor that is public
at android.support.v4.app.Fragment.instantiate(Fragment.java:431)
at android.support.v4.app.FragmentState.instantiate(Fragment.java:102)
at android.support.v4.app.FragmentManagerImpl.restoreAllState(FragmentManager.java:1952)
at android.support.v4.app.FragmentController.restoreAllState(FragmentController.java:144)
at android.support.v4.app.FragmentActivity.onCreate(FragmentActivity.java:307)
at android.support.v7.app.AppCompatActivity.onCreate(AppCompatActivity.java:81)
上面的这两个问题主要涉及后台杀死后FragmentActivity自身的恢复机制,其实super.onCreate(savedInstanceState)在恢复时做了很多我们没有看到的事情,先看一下崩溃:
为什么Fragment没有无参构造方法会引发崩溃
看一下support-V4中FragmentActivity中onCreate代码如下:
protected void onCreate(@Nullable Bundle savedInstanceState) {
mFragments.attachHost(null /*parent*/);
super.onCreate(savedInstanceState);
...
if (savedInstanceState != null) {
Parcelable p = savedInstanceState.getParcelable(FRAGMENTS_TAG);
mFragments.restoreAllState(p, nc != null ? nc.fragments : null);
}
mFragments.dispatchCreate();
}
可以看到如果savedInstanceState != null,就会执行mFragments.restoreAllState逻辑,其实这里就牵扯到恢复时重建逻辑,再被后台异常杀死前,或者说在Activity的onStop执行前,Activity的现场以及Fragment的现场都是已经被保存过的,其实是被保存早ActivityManagerService中,保存的格式FragmentState,重建的时候,会采用反射机制重新创Fragment
void restoreAllState(Parcelable state, List<Fragment> nonConfig) {
...
for (int i=0; i<fms.mActive.length; i++) {
FragmentState fs = fms.mActive[i];
if (fs != null) {
Fragment f = fs.instantiate(mHost, mParent);
mActive.add(f);
...
其实就是调用FragmentState的instantiate,进而调用Fragment的instantiate,最后通过反射,构建Fragment,也就是,被加到FragmentActivity的Fragment在恢复的时候,会被自动创建,并且采用Fragment的默认无参构造方法,如果没哟这个方法,就会抛出InstantiationException异常,这也是为什么第二个例子中会出现崩溃的原因。
*/
public static Fragment instantiate(Context context, String fname, @Nullable Bundle args) {
try {
Class<?> clazz = sClassMap.get(fname);
if (clazz == null) {
// Class not found in the cache, see if it's real, and try to add it
clazz = context.getClassLoader().loadClass(fname);
sClassMap.put(fname, clazz);
}
Fragment f = (Fragment)clazz.newInstance();
if (args != null) {
args.setClassLoader(f.getClass().getClassLoader());
f.mArguments = args;
}
return f;
} catch (ClassNotFoundException e) {
throw new InstantiationException("Unable to instantiate fragment " + fname
+ ": make sure class name exists, is public, and has an"
+ " empty constructor that is public", e);
} catch (java.lang.InstantiationException e) {
throw new InstantiationException("Unable to instantiate fragment " + fname
+ ": make sure class name exists, is public, and has an"
+ " empty constructor that is public", e);
} catch (IllegalAccessException e) {
throw new InstantiationException("Unable to instantiate fragment " + fname
+ ": make sure class name exists, is public, and has an"
+ " empty constructor that is public", e);
}
}
q
可以看到场景二提示的errormsg跟抛出的异常是可以对应上的,其实Fragment源码里面也说得很清楚:
/**
* Default constructor. <strong>Every</strong> fragment must have an
* empty constructor, so it can be instantiated when restoring its
* activity's state. It is strongly recommended that subclasses do not
* have other constructors with parameters, since these constructors
* will not be called when the fragment is re-instantiated; instead,
* arguments can be supplied by the caller with {@link #setArguments}
* and later retrieved by the Fragment with {@link #getArguments}.
*
* <p>Applications should generally not implement a constructor. The
* first place application code an run where the fragment is ready to
* be used is in {@link #onAttach(Activity)}, the point where the fragment
* is actually associated with its activity. Some applications may also
* want to implement {@link #onInflate} to retrieve attributes from a
* layout resource, though should take care here because this happens for
* the fragment is attached to its activity.
*/
public Fragment() {
}
大意就是,Fragment必须有一个空构造方法,这样才能保证重建流程,并且,Fragment的子类也不推荐有带参数的构造方法,最好采用setArguments来保存参数。下面再来看下为什么会出现两个DialogFragment。
为什么出现两个DialogFragment
Fragment在被创建之后,如果不通过add或者replace添加到Activity的布局中是不会显示的,在保存现场的时候,也是保存了add的这个状态的,来看一下Fragment的add逻辑:此时被后台杀死,或旋转屏幕,被恢复的DialogFragmentActivity时会出现两个FragmentDialog,一个被系统恢复的,一个新建的。
<a name="add_fragment"/>
Add一个Fragment,并显示的原理--所谓Fragment生命周期
通常我们FragmentActivity使用Fragment的方法如下:假设是在oncreate函数中:
@Override
protected void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) {
super.onCreate(savedInstanceState);
Fragment fr = Fragment.instance("")
getSupportFragmentManager().beginTransaction()
.add(R.id.container,fr).commit();
其中getSupportFragmentManager返回的是FragmentManager的子类FragmentManagerImpl,FragmentManagerImpl是FragmentActivity的一个内部类,其Fragment的管理逻辑都是由FragmentManagerImpl来处理的,本文是基于4.3,后面的高版本引入了FragmentController其实也只是多了一层封装,原理差别不是太大,有兴趣可以自己分析:
public class FragmentActivity extends Activity{
...
final FragmentManagerImpl mFragments = new FragmentManagerImpl();
...
final FragmentContainer mContainer = new FragmentContainer() {
@Override
@Nullable
public View findViewById(int id) {
return FragmentActivity.this.findViewById(id);
}
@Override
public boolean hasView() {
Window window = FragmentActivity.this.getWindow();
return (window != null && window.peekDecorView() != null);
}
};
FragmentManagerImpl的beginTransaction()函数返回的是一个BackStackRecord()
@Override
public FragmentTransaction beginTransaction() {
return new (this);
}
从名字就可以看出,beginTransaction是为FragmentActivity生成一条Transaction(事务),可以执行,也可以反向,作为退栈的一个依据,FragmentTransaction的add函数实现如下,
public FragmentTransaction add(Fragment fragment, String tag) {
doAddOp(0, fragment, tag, OP_ADD);//异步操作的,跟Hander类似
return this;
}
private void doAddOp(int containerViewId, Fragment fragment, String tag, int opcmd) {
fragment.mFragmentManager = mManager;
...
Op op = new Op();
op.cmd = opcmd;
op.fragment = fragment;
addOp(op);
}
之后commit这个Transaction, 将Transaction插入到Transaction队列中去,最终会回调FragmentManager的addFragment方法,将Fragment添加FragmentManagerImpl到维护Fragment列表中去,并且根据当前的Activity状态,将Fragment调整到合适的状态,代码如下:
public void addFragment(Fragment fragment, boolean moveToStateNow) {
if (mAdded == null) {
mAdded = new ArrayList<Fragment>();
}
makeActive(fragment);
if (!fragment.mDetached) {
if (mAdded.contains(fragment)) {
throw new IllegalStateException("Fragment already added: " + fragment);
}
mAdded.add(fragment);
fragment.mAdded = true;
fragment.mRemoving = false;
if (fragment.mHasMenu && fragment.mMenuVisible) {
mNeedMenuInvalidate = true;
}
if (moveToStateNow) {
moveToState(fragment);
}
}
}
为什么说FragmentManager是FragmentActivity管理Fragment的核心呢,请看下面:
final class FragmentManagerImpl extends FragmentManager implements LayoutInflaterFactory {
...
ArrayList<Runnable> mPendingActions;
Runnable[] mTmpActions;
boolean mExecutingActions;
ArrayList<Fragment> mActive;
ArrayList<Fragment> mAdded;
ArrayList<Integer> mAvailIndices;
ArrayList<BackStackRecord> mBackStack;
可以看出FragmentManagerImpl帮FragmentActivity维护着所有管理Fragment的列表,FragmentManagerImpl的State是和Activity的State一致的,这是管理Fragment的关键。其实Fragment自身是没有什么生命周期的,它只是一个View的封装,完全依靠FragmentManagerImpl来进行同步模拟生命周期,比如在onCreate函数中创建Fragment,add后,在执行的到Activity自身的onCreateView之前,Fragment的onCreateView是不会执行的,也就是Fragment是被动式的跟FragmentActivity保持一致。既然Fragment只是个View的封装,那么它是如何转换成View,并添加到Container中去的呢?关键是moveToState函数,这个函数强制将新add的Fragment的生命周期与Activity同步:
void moveToState(Fragment f, int newState, int transit, int transitionStyle,
boolean keepActive) {
...
if (f.mState < newState) { //低于当前Activity的状态
switch (f.mState) {
case Fragment.INITIALIZING:
...
f.mActivity = mActivity;
f.mParentFragment = mParent;
f.mFragmentManager = mParent != null
? mParent.mChildFragmentManager : mActivity.mFragments;
f.mCalled = false;
f.onAttach(mActivity);
...
if (!f.mRetaining) {
f.performCreate(f.mSavedFragmentState);
}
case Fragment.CREATED:
if (newState > Fragment.CREATED) {
f.mView = f.performCreateView(f.getLayoutInflater(
f.mSavedFragmentState), container, f.mSavedFragmentState);
f.onViewCreated(f.mView, f.mSavedFragmentState);
f.performActivityCreated(f.mSavedFragmentState);
if (f.mView != null) {
f.restoreViewState(f.mSavedFragmentState);
}
f.mSavedFragmentState = null;
}
case Fragment.ACTIVITY_CREATED:
case Fragment.STOPPED:
if (newState > Fragment.STOPPED) {
f.performStart();
}
case Fragment.STARTED:
if (newState > Fragment.STARTED) {
f.mResumed = true;
f.performResume();
可以看出,add Fragment之后,需要让Fragment跟当前Activity的State保持一致。现在回归正题,对于后台杀死状态下,为什么会show两个DialogFragment呢,我们需要接着看就要Fragment的异常处理的流程,在Fragment没有无参构造方法会引发崩溃里面,分析只是走到了Fragment的构建,现在接着往下走。提供无参构造函数后,Fragment可以正确的新建出来,之后呢?之后就是一些恢复逻辑,接着看restoreAllState
void restoreAllState(Parcelable state, ArrayList<Fragment> nonConfig) {
if (state == null) return;
FragmentManagerState fms = (FragmentManagerState)state;
mActive = new ArrayList<Fragment>(fms.mActive.length);
for (int i=0; i<fms.mActive.length; i++) {
FragmentState fs = fms.mActive[i];
if (fs != null) {
Fragment f = fs.instantiate(mActivity, mParent);
mActive.add(f);
fs.mInstance = null;
// Build the list of currently added fragments.
if (fms.mAdded != null) {
mAdded = new ArrayList<Fragment>(fms.mAdded.length);
for (int i=0; i<fms.mAdded.length; i++) {
Fragment f = mActive.get(fms.mAdded[i]);
if (f == null) {
throwException(new IllegalStateException(
"No instantiated fragment for index #" + fms.mAdded[i]));
}
f.mAdded = true;
if (DEBUG) Log.v(TAG, "restoreAllState: added #" + i + ": " + f);
if (mAdded.contains(f)) {
throw new IllegalStateException("Already added!");
}
mAdded.add(f);
}
// Build the back stack.
if (fms.mBackStack != null) {
mBackStack = new ArrayList<BackStackRecord>(fms.mBackStack.length);
for (int i=0; i<fms.mBackStack.length; i++) {
BackStackRecord bse = fms.mBackStack[i].instantiate(this);
mBackStack.add(bse);
if (bse.mIndex >= 0) {
setBackStackIndex(bse.mIndex, bse);
}
其实到现在现在Fragment相关的信息已经恢复成功了,之后随着FragmentActivity周期显示或者更新了,这些都是被杀死后,在FragmentActiivyt的onCreate函数处理的,也就是默认已经将之前的Fragment添加到mAdded列表中去了,但是,在场景一,我们有手动新建了一个Fragment,并添加进去,所以,mAdded函数中就有连个两个Fragment。这样,在FragmentActivity调用onStart函数之后,会新建mAdded列表中Fragment的视图,将其添加到相应的container中去,并在Activity调用onReusume的时候,显示出来做的,这个时候,就会显示两份,其实如果,在这个时候,你再杀死一次,恢复,就会显示三分,在杀死,重启,就是四份。。。。
@Override
protected void onStart() {
super.onStart();
mStopped = false;
mReallyStopped = false;
mHandler.removeMessages(MSG_REALLY_STOPPED);
if (!mCreated) {
mCreated = true;
mFragments.dispatchActivityCreated();
}
mFragments.noteStateNotSaved();
mFragments.execPendingActions();
mFragments.doLoaderStart();
// NOTE: HC onStart goes here.
mFragments.dispatchStart();
mFragments.reportLoaderStart();
}
以上就是针对两个场景,对FramgentActivity的一些分析,主要是回复时候,对于Framgent的一些处理。
<a name="onSaveInstanceState_OnRestoreInstance"/>
onSaveInstanceState与OnRestoreInstance的调用时机
在在点击home键,或者跳转其他界面的时候,都会回调用onSaveInstanceState,但是再次唤醒却不一定调用OnRestoreInstance,这是为什么呢?onSaveInstanceState与OnRestoreInstance难道不是配对使用的?在Android中,onSaveInstanceState是为了预防Activity被后台杀死的情况做的预处理,如果Activity没有被后台杀死,那么自然也就不需要进行现场的恢复,也就不会调用OnRestoreInstance,而大多数情况下,Activity不会那么快被杀死。
onSaveInstanceState的调用时机
onSaveInstanceState函数是Android针对可能被后台杀死的Activity做的一种预防,它的执行时机在2.3之前是在onPause之前,2.3之后,放在了onStop函数之前,也就说Activity失去焦点后,可能会由于内存不足,被回收的情况下,都会去执行onSaveInstanceState。对于startActivity函数的调用很多文章都有介绍,可以简单参考下老罗的博客[Android应用程序内部启动Activity过程(startActivity)的源代码分析],比如在Activity A 调用startActivity启动Activity B的时候,会首先通过AMS pause Activity A,之后唤起B,在B显示,再stop A,在stop A的时候,需要保存A的现场,因为不可见的Activity都是可能被后台杀死的,比如,在开发者选项中打开不保留活动,就会达到这种效果,在启动另一个Activity时,上一个Activity的保存流程大概如下,这里先简单描述,在下一篇原理篇的时候,会详细讲解下流程:
在2.3之后,onSaveInstanceState的时机都放在了onStop之前,看一下FragmentActivity的onSaveInstanceState源码:
@Override
protected void onSaveInstanceState(Bundle outState) {
super.onSaveInstanceState(outState);
Parcelable p = mFragments.saveAllState();
if (p != null) {
outState.putParcelable(FRAGMENTS_TAG, p);
}
}
可以看出,首先就是父类的onSaveInstanceState,主要是保存一些窗口及View的信息,比如ViewPager当前显示的是第几个View等。之后,就是就是通过FragmentManager的saveAllState,来保存FragmentActivity自身的现场-Fragment的一些状态,这些数据是FragmentActivity恢复Framgent所必须的数据,处理不好就会出现上面的那种异常。
OnRestoreInstanceState的调用时机
之前已经说过,OnRestoreInstanceState虽然与onSaveInstanceState是配对实现的,但是其调用却并非完全成对的,在Activity跳转或者返回主界面时,onSaveInstanceState是一定会调用的,但是OnRestoreInstanceState却不会,它只有Activity或者App被异常杀死,走恢复流程的时候才会被调用。如果没有被异常杀死,不走Activity的恢复新建流程,也就不会回调OnRestoreInstanceState,简单看一下Activity的加载流程图:
可以看出,OnRestoreInstanceState的调用时机是在onStart之后,在onPostCreate之前。那么正常的创建为什么没调用呢?看一下ActivityThread中启动Activity的源码:
private Activity performLaunchActivity(Activi
...
mInstrumentation.callActivityOnCreate(activity, r.state);
r.activity = activity;
r.stopped = true;
if (!r.activity.mFinished) {
activity.performStart();
r.stopped = false;
}
if (!r.activity.mFinished) {
if (r.state != null) {
mInstrumentation.callActivityOnRestoreInstanceState(activity, r.state);
}
}
if (!r.activity.mFinished) {
activity.mCalled = false;
mInstrumentation.callActivityOnPostCreate(activity, r.state);
}
}
可以看出,只有r.state != null的时候,才通过mInstrumentation.callActivityOnRestoreInstanceState回调OnRestoreInstanceState,r.state就是ActivityManagerService通过Binder传给ActivityThread数据,主要用来做场景恢复。以上就是onSaveInstanceState与OnRestoreInstance执行时机的一些分析。下面结合具体的系统View控件来分析一下这两个函数的具体应用:比如ViewPager与FragmentTabHost,这两个空间是主界面最常用的控件,内部对后台杀死做了兼容,这也是为什么被杀死后,Viewpager在恢复后,能自动定位到上次浏览的位置。
ViewPager应对后台杀死做的兼容
首先看一下ViewPager做的兼容,ViewPager在后台杀死的情况下,仍然能恢复到上次关闭的位置,这也是对体验的一种优化,这其中的原理是什么?之前分析onSaveInstanceState与onRestoreInstanceState的时候,只关注了Fragment的处理,其实还有一些针对Window窗口及Vie的处理,先看一下onSaveInstanceState针对窗口保存了什么:
protected void onSaveInstanceState(Bundle outState) {
outState.putBundle(WINDOW_HIERARCHY_TAG, mWindow.saveHierarchyState());
}
PhonwWinow.java
@Override
public Bundle saveHierarchyState() {
Bundle outState = new Bundle();
if (mContentParent == null) {
return outState;
}
SparseArray<Parcelable> states = new SparseArray<Parcelable>();
mContentParent.saveHierarchyState(states);
outState.putSparseParcelableArray(VIEWS_TAG, states);
// save the focused view id
View focusedView = mContentParent.findFocus();
...
outState.putInt(FOCUSED_ID_TAG, focusedView.getId());
// save the panels
if (panelStates.size() > 0) {
outState.putSparseParcelableArray(PANELS_TAG, panelStates);
}
if (mActionBar != null) {
outState.putSparseParcelableArray(ACTION_BAR_TAG, actionBarStates);
}
return outState;
}
Window其实就是PhonwWinow,saveHierarchyState其实就是针对当前窗口中的View保存一些场景信息 ,比如:当前获取焦点的View的id、ActionBar、View的一些状态,当然saveHierarchyState递归遍历所有子View,保存所有需要保存的状态:
ViewGroup.java
@Override
protected void dispatchSaveInstanceState(SparseArray<Parcelable> container) {
super.dispatchSaveInstanceState(container);
final int count = mChildrenCount;
final View[] children = mChildren;
for (int i = 0; i < count; i++) {
View c = children[i];
if ((c.mViewFlags & PARENT_SAVE_DISABLED_MASK) != PARENT_SAVE_DISABLED) {
c.dispatchSaveInstanceState(container);
}
}
}
可见,该函数首先通过super.dispatchSaveInstanceState保存自身的状态,再递归传递给子View。onSaveInstanceState主要用于获取View需要保存的State,并将自身的ID作为Key,存储到SparseArray<Parcelable> states列表中,其实就PhoneWindow的一个列表,这些数据最后会通过Binder保存到ActivityManagerService中去
View.java
protected void dispatchSaveInstanceState(SparseArray<Parcelable> container) {
if (mID != NO_ID && (mViewFlags & SAVE_DISABLED_MASK) == 0) {
mPrivateFlags &= ~PFLAG_SAVE_STATE_CALLED;
Parcelable state = onSaveInstanceState();
if ((mPrivateFlags & PFLAG_SAVE_STATE_CALLED) == 0) {
throw new IllegalStateException(
"Derived class did not call super.onSaveInstanceState()");
}
if (state != null) {
container.put(mID, state);
}
}
}
那么针对ViewPager到底存储了什么信息?通过下面的代码很容易看出,其实就是新建个了一个SavedState场景数据,并且将当前的位置mCurItem存进去。
@Override
public Parcelable onSaveInstanceState() {
Parcelable superState = super.onSaveInstanceState();
SavedState ss = new SavedState(superState);
ss.position = mCurItem;
if (mAdapter != null) {
ss.adapterState = mAdapter.saveState();
}
return ss;
}
到这里存储的事情基本就完成了。接下来看一下ViewPager的恢复以及onRestoreInstanceState到底做了什么,
protected void onRestoreInstanceState(Bundle savedInstanceState) {
if (mWindow != null) {
Bundle windowState = savedInstanceState.getBundle(WINDOW_HIERARCHY_TAG);
if (windowState != null) {
mWindow.restoreHierarchyState(windowState);
}
}
}
从代码可以看出,其实就是获取当时保存的窗口信息,之后通过mWindow.restoreHierarchyState做数据恢复,
@Override
public void restoreHierarchyState(Bundle savedInstanceState) {
if (mContentParent == null) {
return;
}
SparseArray<Parcelable> savedStates
= savedInstanceState.getSparseParcelableArray(VIEWS_TAG);
if (savedStates != null) {
mContentParent.restoreHierarchyState(savedStates);
}
...
if (mActionBar != null) {
...
mActionBar.restoreHierarchyState(actionBarStates);
}
}
对于ViewPager会发生什么?从源码很容易看出,其实就是取出SavedState,并获取到异常杀死的时候的位置,以便后续的恢复,
ViewPager.java
@Override
public void onRestoreInstanceState(Parcelable state) {
if (!(state instanceof SavedState)) {
super.onRestoreInstanceState(state);
return;
}
SavedState ss = (SavedState)state;
super.onRestoreInstanceState(ss.getSuperState());
if (mAdapter != null) {
mAdapter.restoreState(ss.adapterState, ss.loader);
setCurrentItemInternal(ss.position, false, true);
} else {
mRestoredCurItem = ss.position;
mRestoredAdapterState = ss.adapterState;
mRestoredClassLoader = ss.loader;
}
}
以上就解释了ViewPager是如何通过onSaveInstanceState与onRestoreInstanceState保存、恢复现场的。如果是ViewPager+FragmentAdapter的使用方式,就同时涉及FragmentActivity的恢复、也牵扯到Viewpager的恢复,其实FragmentAdapter也同样针对后台杀死做了一些兼容,防止重复新建Fragment,看一下FragmentAdapter的源码:
FragmentPagerAdapter.java
@Override
public Object instantiateItem(ViewGroup container, int position) {
if (mCurTransaction == null) {
mCurTransaction = mFragmentManager.beginTransaction();
}
final long itemId = getItemId(position);
// Do we already have this fragment?
<!--是否已经新建了Fragment??-->
String name = makeFragmentName(container.getId(), itemId);
Fragment fragment = mFragmentManager.findFragmentByTag(name);
1 如果Activity中存在相应Tag的Fragment,就不要通过getItem新建
if (fragment != null) {
mCurTransaction.attach(fragment);
} else {
2 如果Activity中不存在相应Tag的Fragment,就需要通过getItem新建
fragment = getItem(position);
mCurTransaction.add(container.getId(), fragment,
makeFragmentName(container.getId(), itemId));
}
if (fragment != mCurrentPrimaryItem) {
FragmentCompat.setMenuVisibility(fragment, false);
FragmentCompat.setUserVisibleHint(fragment, false);
}
return fragment;
}
从1与2 可以看出,通过后台恢复,在FragmentActivity的onCreate函数中,会重建Fragment列表,那些被重建的Fragment不会再次通过getItem再次创建,再来看一下相似的控件FragmentTabHost,FragmentTabHost也是主页常用的控件,FragmentTabHost也有相应的后台杀死处理机制,从名字就能看出,这个是专门针对Fragment才创建出来的控件。
FragmentTabHost应对后台杀死做的兼容
FragmentTabHost其实跟ViewPager很相似,在onSaveInstanceState执行的时候保存当前位置,并在onRestoreInstanceState恢复postion,并重新赋值给Tabhost,之后FragmentTabHost在onAttachedToWindow时,就可以根据恢复的postion设置当前位置,代码如下:
FragmentTabHost.java
@Override
protected Parcelable onSaveInstanceState() {
Parcelable superState = super.onSaveInstanceState();
SavedState ss = new SavedState(superState);
ss.curTab = getCurrentTabTag();
return ss;
}
@Override
protected void onRestoreInstanceState(Parcelable state) {
if (!(state instanceof SavedState)) {
super.onRestoreInstanceState(state);
return;
}
SavedState ss = (SavedState) state;
super.onRestoreInstanceState(ss.getSuperState());
setCurrentTabByTag(ss.curTab);
}
在FragmentTabHost执行onAttachedToWindow时候,会首先getCurrentTabTag ,如果是经历了后台杀死,这里得到的值其实是恢复的SavedState里的值,之后通过doTabChanged切换到响应的Tab,注意这里切换的时候,Fragment由于已经重建了,是不会再次新建的。
@Override
protected void onAttachedToWindow() {
super.onAttachedToWindow();
String currentTab = getCurrentTabTag();
...
ft = doTabChanged(currentTab, ft);
if (ft != null) {
ft.commit();
mFragmentManager.executePendingTransactions();
}
}
App开发时针对后台杀死处理方式
- 最简单的方式,但是效果一般:取消系统恢复
比如:针对FragmentActivity ,不重建:
protected void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) {
if (savedInstanceState != null) {
savedInstanceState.putParcelable(“android:support:fragments”, null);}
super.onCreate(savedInstanceState);
}
如果是系统的Actvity改成是“android:fragments",不过这里需要注意:对于ViewPager跟FragmentTabHost不需要额外处理,处理了可能反而有反作用。
针对Window,如果不想让View使用恢复逻辑,在基类的FragmentActivity中覆盖onRestoreInstanceState函数即可。
protected void onRestoreInstanceState(Bundle savedInstanceState) {
}
当然以上的做法都是比较粗暴的做法,最好还是顺着Android的设计,在需要保存现场的地方保存,在需要恢复的地方,去除相应的数据进行恢复。以上就是后台杀死针对FragmentActivity、onSaveInstanceState、onRestoreInstanceState的一些分析,后面会有两篇针对后台杀死原理,以及ActivityManagerService如何处理杀死及恢复的文章。
自己是从事了七年开发的Android工程师,不少人私下问我,2019年Android进阶该怎么学,方法有没有?
没错,年初我花了一个多月的时间整理出来的学习资料,希望能帮助那些想进阶提升Android开发,却又不知道怎么进阶学习的朋友。【包括高级UI、性能优化、架构师课程、NDK、Kotlin、混合式开发(ReactNative+Weex)、Flutter等架构技术资料】,希望能帮助到您面试前的复习且找到一个好的工作,也节省大家在网上搜索资料的时间来学习。
网友评论