一、前言（了解ReferenceQueue）
在分析LeakCanary原理之前，首先需要了解ReferenceQueue在LeakCanary的作用。
WeakReference在创建时，如果指定一个ReferenceQueue对象，在垃圾回收检测到被引用的对象的可达性更改后，垃圾回收器会将已注册的引用对象添加到ReferenceQueue对象中，等待ReferenceQueue处理。但是如果当GC过后引用对象仍然不被加入ReferenceQueue中，就可能存在内存泄露问题。这里ReferenceQueue对象中，存的其实就是WeakReference对象，而不是WeakReference中引用的要被回收的对象。即GC过后，WeakReference引用的对象被回收了，那么WeakReference引用的对象就是null，那么该WeakReference对象就会被加入到ReferenceQueue队列中。
所以我们可以通过监听 Activity.onDestroy() 回调之后，通过弱引用（WeakReference）对象、ReferenceQueue和 GC来观测Activity引用的内存泄露情况，如果发现了未被回收的Activity对象，在找到该Activity对象是否被其他对象所引用，如果被其他对象引用，就进行 heap dump生成完整的内存引用链（最短引用链），并通过notification等方式展示出来。
二、LeakCanary的启动
LeakCanary2.+的启动，与LeakCanary1.+的不同，1.+版本的启动，需要在Application的onCreate中手动调用LeakCanary.install方法进行启动；而2.+版本的启动则不需要，而是依赖ContentProvider，因为ContentProvider会在Application之前被加载，所以ContentProvider的onCreate方法会在Application的onCreate方法之前被调用，所以在ContentProvider的onCreate方法中完成初始化工作。
在源码中leakcanary-leaksentry中有一个LeakSentryInstaller，LeakSentryInstaller其实就是ContentProvider的一个子类，在其onCreate方法中就会调用InternalLeakSentry.install(application)进行初始化工作。
internal class LeakSentryInstaller : ContentProvider() {
override fun onCreate(): Boolean {
CanaryLog.logger = DefaultCanaryLog()
val application = context!!.applicationContext as Application
InternalLeakSentry.install(application) // 进行初始化工作，核心
return true
}
...
}
然后在AndroidManifest.xml中注册该ContentProvider。在这里注册，那么打包项目时，会将每个库和library中的AndroidManifest.xml合并到最终的app的androidManifest中。
<application>
<provider
android:name="leakcanary.internal.LeakSentryInstaller"
android:authorities="${applicationId}.leak-sentry-installer"
android:exported="false"/>
</application>
三、LeakCanary的初始化
LeakCanary的初始化是在InternalLeakSentry的install方法，即在ContentProvider的onCreate中调用。
1.InternalLeakSentry#install
private val mainHandler = Handler(Looper.getMainLooper())
init {//构造函数
listener = try {//InternalLeakCanary是继承自LeakSentryListener，然后这里它是一个kotlin单例模式
val leakCanaryListener = Class.forName("leakcanary.internal.InternalLeakCanary")
leakCanaryListener.getDeclaredField("INSTANCE").get(null) as LeakSentryListener
} catch (ignored: Throwable) {
LeakSentryListener.None
}
}
private val checkRetainedExecutor = Executor { // 默认五秒后执行
mainHandler.postDelayed(it, LeakSentry.config.watchDurationMillis)
}
val refWatcher = RefWatcher(
clock = clock,
checkRetainedExecutor = checkRetainedExecutor,
onReferenceRetained = { listener.onReferenceRetained() },
isEnabled = { LeakSentry.config.enabled }
)
fun install(application: Application) {
CanaryLog.d("Installing LeakSentry")
checkMainThread() // 只能在主线程调用，否则会抛出异常
if (this::application.isInitialized) {
return
}
InternalLeakSentry.application = application
val configProvider = { LeakSentry.config }
// 这里监听页面的销毁
// 在这里会调用RefWatcher.watch()方法监测Activity的引用
// 其中RefWatcher在InternalLeakSentry类中创建。
ActivityDestroyWatcher.install( // 监听 Activity.onDestroy()
application, refWatcher, configProvider
)
// 在这里会创建多个FragmentDestroyWatcher
// 其内部采用单例的方式，用List列表存储FragmentDestroyWatcher
// 而具体的FragmentDestroyWatcher其实就是SupportFragmentDestroyWatcher
// SupportFragmentDestroyWatcher是其接口实现类
// 这是androidx使用，但是需要fragment可以使用
// FragmentDestroyWatcher中会监听生命周期的onActivityCreated方法
// 遍历所有的FragmentDestroyWatcher，调用其watchFragments方法
// watchFragments方法在SupportFragmentDestroyWatcher的实现，其实就是
// 注册该fragment的生命周期的监听
FragmentDestroyWatcher.install( // 监听 Fragment.onDestroy()
application, refWatcher, configProvider
)
// 初始化检测内存泄露过程中需要用到的对象
listener.onLeakSentryInstalled(application) // Sentry 哨兵
}
这里的listener是LeakSentryListener接口，而实现LeakSentryListener接口的类，其实就是InternalLeakCanary，InternalLeakCanary是在leakcanary-android-core下的，InternalLeakCanary是单例模式的，采用的是kotlin单例，即用object关键字修饰类。
2.InternalLeakCanary#onLeakSentryInstalled
override fun onLeakSentryInstalled(application: Application) {
this.application = application
// 用于 heap dump：堆转储
val heapDumper = AndroidHeapDumper(application, leakDirectoryProvider)
val gcTrigger = GcTrigger.Default // 用于手动调用 GC
val configProvider = { LeakCanary.config } // 配置项
val handlerThread = HandlerThread(LEAK_CANARY_THREAD_NAME)
handlerThread.start()
val backgroundHandler = Handler(handlerThread.looper) // 发起内存泄漏检测的线程
// 堆转存储触发器
heapDumpTrigger = HeapDumpTrigger(
application, backgroundHandler, LeakSentry.refWatcher, gcTrigger, heapDumper, configProvider
)
application.registerVisibilityListener { applicationVisible ->
// 这里的applicationVisible其实就是调用扩展函数registerVisibilityListener
// 的时候，创建的VisibilityTracker对象传入的listener变量
// 在接收生命周期回调的时候，在onActivityStarted传入true，
// 在onActivityStopped传入false
// 这里这里的applicationVisible在onStarted的时候是true
// 在onStopped的时候是false
this.applicationVisible = applicationVisible
// 在applicationVisible是false的时候，其内部才会去检查
heapDumpTrigger.onApplicationVisibilityChanged(applicationVisible)
}
// 这是添加动态快捷方式，即在手机桌面添加一个LeakCanary的快捷方式，在debug模式下
addDynamicShortcut(application)
}
// 该方法主要是用于在手机桌面动态生成LeakCanary快捷方式
private fun addDynamicShortcut(application: Application) {
// 如果系统版本小于25，则不添加动态快捷方式
if (VERSION.SDK_INT < VERSION_CODES.N_MR1) {
return
}
// 判断是否允许添加动态快捷方式
if (!application.resources.getBoolean(R.bool.leak_canary_add_dynamic_shortcut)) {
return
}
val shortcutManager = application.getSystemService(ShortcutManager::class.java)!!
val dynamicShortcuts = shortcutManager.dynamicShortcuts
val shortcutInstalled =
dynamicShortcuts.any { shortcut -> shortcut.id == DYNAMIC_SHORTCUT_ID }
if (shortcutInstalled) {
return
}
val mainIntent = Intent(Intent.ACTION_MAIN, null)
mainIntent.addCategory(Intent.CATEGORY_LAUNCHER)
mainIntent.setPackage(application.packageName)
val activities = application.packageManager.queryIntentActivities(mainIntent, 0)
.filter {
it.activityInfo.name != "leakcanary.internal.activity.LeakLauncherActivity"
}
if (activities.isEmpty()) {
return
}
val firstMainActivity = activities.first()
.activityInfo
// Displayed on long tap on app icon
val longLabel: String
// Label when dropping shortcut to launcher
val shortLabel: String
val leakActivityLabel = application.getString(R.string.leak_canary_shortcut_label)
if (activities.isEmpty()) {
longLabel = leakActivityLabel
shortLabel = leakActivityLabel
} else {
val firstLauncherActivityLabel = if (firstMainActivity.labelRes != 0) {
application.getString(firstMainActivity.labelRes)
} else {
val applicationInfo = application.applicationInfo
if (applicationInfo.labelRes != 0) {
application.getString(applicationInfo.labelRes)
} else {
applicationInfo.nonLocalizedLabel.toString()
}
}
val fullLengthLabel = "$firstLauncherActivityLabel $leakActivityLabel"
// short label should be under 10 and long label under 25
if (fullLengthLabel.length > 10) {
if (fullLengthLabel.length <= 25) {
longLabel = fullLengthLabel
shortLabel = leakActivityLabel
} else {
longLabel = leakActivityLabel
shortLabel = leakActivityLabel
}
} else {
longLabel = fullLengthLabel
shortLabel = fullLengthLabel
}
}
val componentName = ComponentName(firstMainActivity.packageName, firstMainActivity.name)
val shortcutCount = dynamicShortcuts.count { shortcutInfo ->
shortcutInfo.activity == componentName
} + shortcutManager.manifestShortcuts.count { shortcutInfo ->
shortcutInfo.activity == componentName
}
if (shortcutCount >= shortcutManager.maxShortcutCountPerActivity) {
return
}
val intent = leakDisplayActivityIntent
intent.action = "Dummy Action because Android is stupid"
val shortcut = Builder(application, DYNAMIC_SHORTCUT_ID)
.setLongLabel(longLabel)
.setShortLabel(shortLabel)
.setActivity(componentName)
.setIcon(Icon.createWithResource(application, R.mipmap.leak_canary_icon))
.setIntent(intent)
.build()
try {
shortcutManager.addDynamicShortcuts(listOf(shortcut))
} catch (ignored: Throwable) {
CanaryLog.d(
ignored,
"Could not add dynamic shortcut. " +
"shortcutCount=$shortcutCount, " +
"maxShortcutCountPerActivity=${shortcutManager.maxShortcutCountPerActivity}"
)
}
}
四、FragmentDestroyWatcher.install
这里使用的RefWatcher对象，是在InternalLeakSentry中进行初始化的，然后在调用ActivityDestroyWatcher和FragmentDestroyWatcher的install方法的时候，传入。
internal interface FragmentDestroyWatcher {
// 实现类是SupportFragmentDestroyWatcher
fun watchFragments(activity: Activity)
companion object {
private const val SUPPORT_FRAGMENT_CLASS_NAME = "androidx.fragment.app.Fragment"
fun install(
application: Application,
refWatcher: RefWatcher,
configProvider: () -> LeakSentry.Config
) {
val fragmentDestroyWatchers = mutableListOf<FragmentDestroyWatcher>()
if (SDK_INT >= O) { // >= 26，使用 AndroidOFragmentDestroyWatcher
fragmentDestroyWatchers.add(
AndroidOFragmentDestroyWatcher(refWatcher, configProvider)
)
}
if (classAvailable(
SUPPORT_FRAGMENT_CLASS_NAME
)
) {
fragmentDestroyWatchers.add(
// androidx 使用 SupportFragmentDestroyWatcher
SupportFragmentDestroyWatcher(refWatcher, configProvider)
)
}
if (fragmentDestroyWatchers.size == 0) {
return
}
application.registerActivityLifecycleCallbacks(object : ActivityLifecycleCallbacksAdapter() {
override fun onActivityCreated(
activity: Activity,
savedInstanceState: Bundle?
) {
// 遍历所有的fragmentDestroyWatchers
// 调用其watchFragments，其实就是调用SupportFragmentDestroyWatcher
// 中的方法实现
// 遍历fragmentDestroyWatchers调用watchFragments的时候
// 其实就是对fragment添加生命周期监听，用于在生命周期回调的时候调用RefWatcher.watch方法
for (watcher in fragmentDestroyWatchers) {
watcher.watchFragments(activity)
}
}
})
}
private fun classAvailable(className: String): Boolean {
return try {
Class.forName(className)
true
} catch (e: ClassNotFoundException) {
false
}
}
}
}
internal class SupportFragmentDestroyWatcher(
private val refWatcher: RefWatcher,
private val configProvider: () -> Config
) : FragmentDestroyWatcher {
// 这是注册给fragment的生命周期监听的
// 从这里可以看出，fragment销毁的时候，其实也会调用RefWatcher.watch
private val fragmentLifecycleCallbacks = object : FragmentManager.FragmentLifecycleCallbacks() {
override fun onFragmentViewDestroyed(
fm: FragmentManager,
fragment: Fragment
) {
val view = fragment.view
if (view != null && configProvider().watchFragmentViews) {
refWatcher.watch(view)
}
}
override fun onFragmentDestroyed(
fm: FragmentManager,
fragment: Fragment
) {
if (configProvider().watchFragments) {
refWatcher.watch(fragment)
}
}
}
override fun watchFragments(activity: Activity) {
// 这里就是根据传入的FragmentActivity，然后获取supportFragmentManager
// 对Fragment进行生命周期的监听注册
if (activity is FragmentActivity) {
val supportFragmentManager = activity.supportFragmentManager
supportFragmentManager.registerFragmentLifecycleCallbacks(fragmentLifecycleCallbacks, true)
}
}
}
五、RefWatcher
在监测Activity和Fragment的生命周期进行内存回收以及是否泄露的过程，就是调用RefWatcher.watch方法进行，该方法是使用Synchronized修饰的同步方法。RefWatcher.watch的方法，一般是在Activity和Fragment生命周期执行到onDestroy的时候调用。根据生命周期监听触发回调，然后调用RefWatcher.watch方法。
class RefWatcher constructor(
private val clock: Clock,
private val checkRetainedExecutor: Executor,
private val onReferenceRetained: () -> Unit,
/**
* Calls to [watch] will be ignored when [isEnabled] returns false
*/
private val isEnabled: () -> Boolean = { true }
) {
/**
* References passed to [watch] that haven't made it to [retainedReferences] yet.
* watch() 方法传进来的引用，尚未判定为泄露
*/
private val watchedReferences = mutableMapOf<String, KeyedWeakReference>()
/**
* References passed to [watch] that we have determined to be retained longer than they should
* have been.
* watch() 方法传进来的引用，已经被判定为泄露
*/
private val retainedReferences = mutableMapOf<String, KeyedWeakReference>()
// 引用队列，配合弱引用使用，当弱引用中的对象被回收时，接收弱引用对象
private val queue = ReferenceQueue<Any>()
val hasRetainedReferences: Boolean
@Synchronized get() {
removeWeaklyReachableReferences()
return retainedReferences.isNotEmpty()
}
val hasWatchedReferences: Boolean
@Synchronized get() {
removeWeaklyReachableReferences()
return retainedReferences.isNotEmpty() || watchedReferences.isNotEmpty()
}
val retainedKeys: Set<String>
@Synchronized get() {
removeWeaklyReachableReferences()
return HashSet(retainedReferences.keys)
}
/**
* Identical to [.watch] with an empty string reference name.
*/
@Synchronized fun watch(watchedReference: Any) {
watch(watchedReference, "")
}
/**
* Watches the provided references.
*
* @param referenceName An logical identifier for the watched object.
*/
@Synchronized fun watch(
watchedReference: Any,
referenceName: String
) {
if (!isEnabled()) {
return
}
// 移除队列中将要被 GC 的引用
removeWeaklyReachableReferences()
val key = UUID.randomUUID()
.toString()
val watchUptimeMillis = clock.uptimeMillis()
// 构建当前引用的弱引用对象，并关联引用队列 queue
// queue是一个ReferenceQueue对象，该对象是用来保存已经回收了的对象的弱引用
// 即构建给对象构建弱引用对象，当对象被回收的时候，引用该对象的弱引用就会被加入到ReferenceQueue队列的末尾
val reference =
KeyedWeakReference(watchedReference, key, referenceName, watchUptimeMillis, queue)
if (referenceName != "") {
CanaryLog.d(
"Watching instance of %s named %s with key %s", reference.className,
referenceName, key
)
} else {
CanaryLog.d(
"Watching instance of %s with key %s", reference.className, key
)
}
// 如果该对象尚未被判定为泄露，则将该弱引用加入到watchedReferences
// 将引用存入 watchedReferences
watchedReferences[key] = reference
// 这里采用线程池执行
// 该线程池的赋值是在InternalLeakSentry初始化RefWatcher对象的时候赋值的
// 该线程池的内部执行是采用mainHandler的方式，切换到主线程进行执行
/*
private val checkRetainedExecutor = Executor { // 默认五秒后执行
mainHandler.postDelayed(it, LeakSentry.config.watchDurationMillis)
}
LeakSentry.config.watchDurationMillis的定义是在LeakSentry
val watchDurationMillis: Long = TimeUnit.SECONDS.toMillis(5)
*/
checkRetainedExecutor.execute {
moveToRetained(key) // 如果当前引用未被移除，仍在 watchedReferences 队列中，
// 说明仍未被 GC，移入 retainedReferences 队列中,暂时标记为泄露
}
}
@Synchronized private fun moveToRetained(key: String) {
removeWeaklyReachableReferences() // 再次调用，防止遗漏
val retainedRef = watchedReferences.remove(key)
if (retainedRef != null) {//说明可能存在内存泄漏
retainedReferences[key] = retainedRef
onReferenceRetained()
}
}
@Synchronized fun removeRetainedKeys(keysToRemove: Set<String>) {
retainedReferences.keys.removeAll(keysToRemove)
}
@Synchronized fun clearWatchedReferences() {
watchedReferences.clear()
retainedReferences.clear()
}
private fun removeWeaklyReachableReferences() {
// WeakReferences are enqueued as soon as the object to which they point to becomes weakly
// reachable. This is before finalization or garbage collection has actually happened.
// 弱引用一旦变得弱可达，就会立即入队。这将在 finalization 或者 GC 之前发生。
var ref: KeyedWeakReference?
do {
ref = queue.poll() as KeyedWeakReference? // 队列 queue 中的对象都是会被 GC 的
if (ref != null) {//说明被释放了
val removedRef = watchedReferences.remove(ref.key)//获取被释放的引用的key
if (removedRef == null) {
retainedReferences.remove(ref.key)
}
// 移除 watchedReferences 队列中的会被 GC 的 ref 对象，剩下的就是可能泄露的对象
}
} while (ref != null)
}
}
private fun removeWeaklyReachableReferences() {
// WeakReferences are enqueued as soon as the object to which they point to becomes weakly
// reachable. This is before finalization or garbage collection has actually happened.
// 弱引用一旦变得弱可达，就会立即入队。这将在 finalization 或者 GC 之前发生。
var ref: KeyedWeakReference?
do {
ref = queue.poll() as KeyedWeakReference? // 队列 queue 中的对象都是会被 GC 的
if (ref != null) {
//说明queue中有弱引用对象，说明该弱引用对象引用的对象被释放了
// 获取被释放的引用的key
// 从两个map集合中进行释放
val removedRef = watchedReferences.remove(ref.key)
// 这里判断为空的原因是，如果在watchedReferences中没有该对象
// 那么说明该对象已经被判定为泄露，但是这个时候该对象又被回收了，
// 所以得从这个判定泄露的集合中移除该判定
if (removedRef == null) {
retainedReferences.remove(ref.key)
}
// 移除 watchedReferences 队列中的会被 GC 的 ref 对象，剩下的就是可能泄露的对象
}
} while (ref != null)
}
@Synchronized private fun moveToRetained(key: String) {
// 再次调用，防止遗漏
removeWeaklyReachableReferences()
// 如果移除ReferenceQueue队列中的弱引用之后，
// 在watchedReferences队列中依然还有该对象，说明该弱引用引用的对象在此时依然不是弱可达
// 此时就不会移除watchedReferences中的弱引用
// 那么说明此时就存在内存泄露的可能，则需要将watchedReferences中key对应的弱引用
// 加入到retainedReferences中，判断该弱引用引用的对象是可能泄露的对象
val retainedRef = watchedReferences.remove(key)
if (retainedRef != null) {//说明可能存在内存泄漏
retainedReferences[key] = retainedRef
onReferenceRetained()
}
}
六、VisibilityTracker
VisibilityTracker其实就是在InternalLeakCanary.onLeakSentryInstalled方法中通过调用application.registerVisibilityListener方法的时候，添加的Application.ActivityLifecycleCallbacks，这里采用适配器模式，使用适配器模式的目的，其实就是不需要重写所有方法，只在VisibilityTracker中重写需要使用的方法。
VisibilityTracker的目的其实就是监听Activity的生命周期变化，即是否是执行到了onStart和onStop，如果是onStop的时候，则做内存泄露监测工作。
VisibilityTracker与ActivityDestroyWatcher有点区别，ActivityDestroyWatcher是最终Activity执行onDestroy的时候进行内存泄露分析
internal class VisibilityTracker(
private val listener: (Boolean) -> Unit
) :
ActivityLifecycleCallbacksAdapter() {
private var startedActivityCount = 0
/**
* Visible activities are any activity started but not stopped yet. An activity can be paused
* yet visible: this will happen when another activity shows on top with a transparent background
* and the activity behind won't get touch inputs but still need to render / animate.
*/
private var hasVisibleActivities: Boolean = false
override fun onActivityStarted(activity: Activity) {
startedActivityCount++
if (!hasVisibleActivities && startedActivityCount == 1) {
hasVisibleActivities = true
listener.invoke(true)
}
}
override fun onActivityStopped(activity: Activity) {
// This could happen if the callbacks were registered after some activities were already
// started. In that case we effectively considers those past activities as not visible.
if (startedActivityCount > 0) {
startedActivityCount--
}
if (hasVisibleActivities && startedActivityCount == 0 && !activity.isChangingConfigurations) {
hasVisibleActivities = false
// 这里就是给InternalLeakCanary.onLeakSentryInstalled中注册的application.registerVisibilityListener
// 传入的listener的回调传入参数为false，表示需要进行内存泄露检测
listener.invoke(false)
}
}
}
internal fun Application.registerVisibilityListener(listener: (Boolean) -> Unit) {
// 当生命周期回调的时候，就会调用VisibilityTracker中重写的方法
// 而在VisibilityTracker中重写了started和stopped两个方法
// 在started中调用listener的时候传入的参数是true
// 在stopped中调用listener的时候传入的参数是false
// 然后在listener这个接口实现的回调中就会接收该listener的参数
// 在根据该参数判断是否需要进行内存泄露监测，这里就是回调到了
// InternalLeakCanary.onLeakSentryInstalled中注册的application.registerVisibilityListener
// 进而调用到了HeapDumpTrigger.onApplicationVisibilityChanged
registerActivityLifecycleCallbacks(VisibilityTracker(listener))
}
七、HeapDumpTrigger#onApplicationVisibilityChanged
本方法是在InternalLeakCanary.onLeakSentryInstalled给application添加生命周期回调的时候，根据onStart和onStop生命周期的变化来进行Heap Dump（heap dump文件(.hprof)）
当生命周期执行到onStop的时候，会向该Application的扩展函数registerVisibilityListener的参数listener这个高阶函数传入boolean参数为false
看InternalLeakCanary#onLeakSentryInstalled方法中对application添加的生命周期监听，这是调用了application的扩展函数，该扩展函数是在VisibilityTracker中定义的。
application.registerVisibilityListener { applicationVisible ->
this.applicationVisible = applicationVisible
heapDumpTrigger.onApplicationVisibilityChanged(applicationVisible)
}
其实registerVisibilityListener方法内部调用的就是application的registerActivityLifecycleCallbacks方法，传入的是Application.ActivityLifecycleCallbacks对象，这里传入的是VisibilityTracker，其实VisibilityTracker就是Application.ActivityLifecycleCallbacks的子类实现。
internal fun Application.registerVisibilityListener(listener: (Boolean) -> Unit) {
registerActivityLifecycleCallbacks(VisibilityTracker(listener))
}
HeapDumpTrigger.onApplicationVisibilityChanged方法的调用，就是根据上述传给VisibilityTracker的listener函数来回调调用的，listener接收的是false的时候，就会调用scheduleRetainedInstanceCheck，接收的是false的时候是生命周期执行到onStop的时候。
fun onApplicationVisibilityChanged(applicationVisible: Boolean) {
if (applicationVisible) {
applicationInvisibleAt = -1L
} else {
applicationInvisibleAt = SystemClock.uptimeMillis()
scheduleRetainedInstanceCheck("app became invisible", LeakSentry.config.watchDurationMillis)
}
}
这里的delayMillis默认是5s，因为该参数接收的是LeakSentry.config.watchDurationMillis，这个值初始默认值是5s。
private fun scheduleRetainedInstanceCheck(
reason: String,
delayMillis: Long // 默认 5 s
) {
if (checkScheduled) {
return
}
checkScheduled = true
// 通过handler切换到主线程调用，确保是在主线程执行，并且延迟5S执行。
backgroundHandler.postDelayed({
checkScheduled = false
checkRetainedInstances(reason)
}, delayMillis)
}
private fun checkRetainedInstances(reason: String) {
CanaryLog.d("Checking retained instances because %s", reason)
val config = configProvider()
// A tick will be rescheduled when this is turned back on.
if (!config.dumpHeap) {
return
}
// RefWatcher.retainedKeys是一个Set集合，该Set集合是从
// RefWatcher.retainedReferences中获取的数据
// RefWatcher.retainedReferences存储的就是已经被判定为泄露的
var retainedKeys = refWatcher.retainedKeys
// 当前泄露实例个数小于 5 个，不进行 heap dump
if (checkRetainedCount(retainedKeys, config.retainedVisibleThreshold)) return
if (!config.dumpHeapWhenDebugging && DebuggerControl.isDebuggerAttached) {
showRetainedCountWithDebuggerAttached(retainedKeys.size)
scheduleRetainedInstanceCheck("debugger was attached", WAIT_FOR_DEBUG_MILLIS)
CanaryLog.d(
"Not checking for leaks while the debugger is attached, will retry in %d ms",
WAIT_FOR_DEBUG_MILLIS
)
return
}
// 可能存在被观察的引用将要变得弱可达，但是还未入队引用队列。
// 这时候应该主动调用一次 GC，可能可以避免一次 heap dump
// 即被判定为内存泄露的队列中可能有些引用将要变成弱可达
// 这个时候就是将被判定为泄露的一些对象，进行再一次回收。
gcTrigger.runGc()
retainedKeys = refWatcher.retainedKeys
if (checkRetainedCount(retainedKeys, config.retainedVisibleThreshold)) return
// 为heap dump设置被判定为内存泄露的对应的key集合
HeapDumpMemoryStore.setRetainedKeysForHeapDump(retainedKeys)
CanaryLog.d("Found %d retained references, dumping the heap", retainedKeys.size)
HeapDumpMemoryStore.heapDumpUptimeMillis = SystemClock.uptimeMillis()
dismissNotification()
// 输出一个heap dump 文件
val heapDumpFile = heapDumper.dumpHeap() // AndroidHeapDumper
if (heapDumpFile == null) {
CanaryLog.d("Failed to dump heap, will retry in %d ms", WAIT_AFTER_DUMP_FAILED_MILLIS)
scheduleRetainedInstanceCheck("failed to dump heap", WAIT_AFTER_DUMP_FAILED_MILLIS)
showRetainedCountWithHeapDumpFailed(retainedKeys.size)
return
}
refWatcher.removeRetainedKeys(retainedKeys) // 移除已经 heap dump 的 retainedKeys
HeapAnalyzerService.runAnalysis(application, heapDumpFile) // 分析 heap dump 文件
}
网友评论