版权声明:
以下内容来自微信公共帐号“EOS技术爱好者”,搜索“EOSTechLover”即可订阅,作者Yvonne。转载必须保留以上声明。仅授权原文转载。
The thinking and problems caused by the exchange vote
一、交易所的投票所引发的思考和问题
Exchange constituency of impact on node has caught the attention of the whole community and discussion, such a heavy position levels of the votes are in, makes the node ballot looks very strange, there are very few nodes large constituency and hoard the turnout was single more than 90% of the total votes.
交易所票仓对节点的影响之大已经引起了全社区的关注和讨论,这样重仓位级别的投票计入进来,使得节点的投票排名看起来很奇怪,有极个别节点超大票仓及大票仓的投票率达到单个总票数的90%以上。
As of draft date, the total number of votes cast by eos accounted for 26.9969 percent of the total votes cast, which was very low, far from meeting the "will" of the "majority" token holders.
截至发稿日,EOS总的投票数占总票仓的26.9969%,这个比例是非常低的,远没有达到“绝大多数”token持有者的“意志”。
![](https://img.haomeiwen.com/i3229514/d785cfd0ecbf3000.jpeg)
![](https://img.haomeiwen.com/i3229514/484ffd20194c3ce3.jpeg)
According to http://eosnetworkmonitor.io/, the top 10 in the master node, there are four is exchange, at the same time they awarded a rights issue is also accounted for the biggest of all.
根据 http://eosnetworkmonitor.io/ 统计显示,前十大主节点中,有四个都是交易所自身参与的,同时他们所获得的增发奖励也是占比最大的。
![](https://img.haomeiwen.com/i3229514/acaaf4e075d82135.jpeg)
How are the top 30 nodes voting now? In this website (http://eos-bp-votes.dapptools.info/s/api/block-producer-votes-stack-html/1/30, shown here is the top 30 vote) to the vote of each node in the image can clearly see the Bitfinex and ZB this criticism let whole communities of exchange in which a few specific, now before the show has been and is slightly different, plus bitfinex losers wallet removed part of the vote, Perhaps because the public opinion and the community are too skeptical.
现在前30名的各个节点的投票情况是怎么样的呢?在这个网站(http://eos-bp-votes.dapptools.info/s/api/block-producer-votes-stack-html/1/30 ,这里显示的是前30名的投票情况)各个节点的投票情况在这张图中可以清晰的看到Bitfinex和ZB这种让全社区口诛笔伐的交易所具体投了哪几个,现在这个显示已经和之前略有差别,加上Bitfinex的小仓位钱包撤掉了部分投票,大概是因为舆论和社区的质疑声过大。
It is worth thinking that if you vote and withdraw, it will not count? Can token holders vote on behalf of their clients when they are placed in an exchange's asset exchange? I think the answer is debatable and will be read further in a later article.
那么值得思考的是,投过再撤掉就不算数了嘛?token持有者放在交易所的资产交易所就可以代表客户去做投票嘛?我想答案是可以进行争论的,在后面的文章将做进一步的解读。
![](https://img.haomeiwen.com/i3229514/33801dfad59c860b.jpeg)
About more than 50 ranking before can now enjoy from the benefits of inflation, and the top several master node is the vast majority of the weight of the total number of voting, this and the original 21 + 100, although after the adjustment into 21 + 49. If the exchange's vote is dropped, BP, which voted 0.49% to the minimum, would gain at least 5-10 more.
现在大约在50多排名之前的才可以享受来自通胀带来的收益,而排名靠前的几名主节点则占到总投票数的绝大多数权重,这和最初的21+100相去甚远,虽然之后调整成21+49。如果交易所的投票撤掉,那么投票达到最低标准0.49%的BP将至少增加5-10名以上。
As the article https://steemit.com/eos/@eoshenzhen/5c95tv-eos-eos for "rich people" -- how to comment on EOS voting.
The process of guessing the vote went as follows:
正如文章:【翻译】“富人”的EOS——如何评论EOS投票 中写到,猜测的投票过程全程如下:
Operation After Validation
The top 21 are likely to shift wildly, especially during the first hours and days. I expect that few token holders will be able to get activated and vote their staked tokens rapidly. The mechanisms to do this are difficult, and right now require obscure programs or command line execution using the full EOS client program. Very few users will have access to the tools and methods, and fewer will be motivated to learn and perform. We suspect that those who purchased the tokens for pure speculation will move slowly on this.
前21名可能会大幅度转移,特别是在头几个小时和几天内。我们预计很少有token持有者能够迅速获得激活并进行投票。执行此操作的机制很难,现在需要使用完整的EOS客户端程序执行难以理解的程序或执行命令行。很少有用户可以访问这些工具和及掌握使用的方法,这样会减少他们学习及执行的动机。我们怀疑那些购纯粹因为投机代币的人会在这方面的行动力会更不足。
Thus, the opportunity exists for small groups of pre-registered EOS token holders to take rapid initiative and dominate early voting.
因此,预先注册了的的EOS代币持有者的小组迅速採取行动并主导提前投票。
My best guess is that within a day or two, the early registrants will be actively voting, and the top 10-15 BPs will be entrenched, with the next 15-20 moving in and out of the top 21.
我最好的猜测是,在一两天内,早期的注册人将会积极投票,前10-15个BP将会根深蒂固,接下来的15-20个会进入前21名。
This may happen while the chain is not yet validated, in that there are not yet the required 150M votes. During this period, there are no inflation rewards, and no tokens may be un-staked or traded in any way.
这可能发生在链尚未验证的情况下,因为还没有达到要求的1亿5千万投票。在此期间,没有通货膨胀奖励,也没有任何代币可以以任何方式进行放置或交易。
Over the next month, contract holders will trickle in, and when they vote, will tend to cause movement in the 10-21 positions.
在接下来的一个月中,合同持有者会投入,当他们投票时,往往会导致10-21个职位的变动。
Big movements will happen as exchanges enter, both on their own account or user proxies, and via recommendations and tools provided to their user base. We should expect that exchange with large numbers of EOS contracts in their own accounts, and those now emerging as BP candidates, will be early to introduce web tools to make voting easier for their user base, or gather proxies from their user base for voting.
当交易所进入时,大动作将会发生,无论是自己的帐户还是代理账户,还有通过向其用户群提供的建议和工具。我们应该期望,在他们自己的账户中拥有大量EOS合约,现在也成为了BP候选人,将会很早就引入网络工具,使其基础用户更容易投票,或者从用户群中收集代理投票。
There is some danger for the exchange, in that the user tokens are locked up when staked for voting, and the implications of the lockup on liquidity may not be well understood by the speculative user base. I have often heard Korean EOS contract holders ask "what's in it for me to vote? Why should I lock up my tokens to vote for free".
交易所存在一些危险,因为用户代币在投票时被锁定,并且那些投机用户可能不能很好地理解锁定对流动性的影响。我经常听到韩国EOS持有人询问“我有什麽投票权?为什麽我应该锁定我的代币来进行免费投票”。
To the extent that some BPs have friends and supporters who are long term holders of the tokens, they may have a massive advantage in gathering votes from such friends, particularly if they are able to assist others in registering their contracts, staking their tokens, and casting votes.
如果一些BP拥有长期持有这些代币的朋友和支持者,他们可能在收集这些朋友的投票方面拥有巨大的优势,特别是如果他们能够协助其他人登记合同,放弃他们的代币,以及投票。
Exchange now entered the bitfinex, ZB the exchanges in only the second or third receipts warehouse can "support" the exact propped up a master node and several standby node, or if they want to "good relationship", can even cover 21 + voting positions > 0.48% of the nodes (BP more than 0.48% of total votes to enjoy inflation reward).
现在交易所进入了,Bitfinex、ZB这两家交易所仅用排名第二或第三的小票仓就可以“扶持”确切的扶持了一个主节点及若干个备用节点,如果他们想或者“关系”好,甚至可以覆盖21+投票仓位>0.48%的节点(BP总票数的超过0.48%才能享受通胀奖励)。
Block producers are rewarded for each block they produce, and so accumulate potentially 12 block rewards every 126 seconds. The exact rate of reward, for both active, top 21 BPs and for standby, reserve BPs, has been set in EOS Dawn 4.0 at 1%, with 0.25% awarded to the 21 active BPs for blocks produced, and 0.75% awarded to all producers, active and standby, based on their percentage of votes received. To gain the award from the 0.75% pool, the BP must be eligible for at least 100 EOS/day, which implies that they have received at least 0.48% of the total BP votes. Any BP candidate with fewer votes will not receive any EOS inflation rewards.
验证后的操作
BP对他们生产的每个块进行奖励,因此潜在的可能是每126秒就可以积累12块奖励。在EOS Dawn 4.0中,排名前21位BP和备用BP的确切回报率已设定为1%,其中21个活跃BP奖励0.25%,0.75%授予所有奖励块生产者,包括主节点和备用节点,根据他们所收到的选票的百分比。要从0.75%的资金中获得奖励,BP必须有资格获得至少100个EOS /天,这意味著他们已经获得了BP总票数的至少0.48%。任何票数较少的BP候选人都不会收到任何EOS通胀奖励。
Some even called for token storage not to be kept on exchanges, but kept by themselves, for exchanges with large holdings and for several days of heavy losses.
对持仓量巨大的交易所、加上这几天的大跌,一些人甚至呼吁不要将token存放在交易所,而是应该自己保管。
"wake up? No one should vote for the EOS to the exchange. If the exchange takes a position to short the EOS, even if the EOS falls to a dime, the farmers will have meat to eat and the meat will be missed by wolves. As long as it is not an exchange, the nodes at the top of the ranking can vote. If you want the EOS to rise, please forward it more.
“醒醒吧?大家都不要把EOS的票投给交易所了,如果交易所坐庄做空EOS,EOS就算下跌到一毛钱一个,庄家也有肉吃,有肉就会遭豺狼惦记。只要不是交易所,排名靠前的节点都能投,想要EOS上涨就多转发”。
The exchange has raised questions and concerns in the community, and Dan has said this in the telegraph group:
交易所这样引起社区的质疑和担忧,Dan在电报群也曾经发出这样的言论:
If finds out about all the wrong transactions, block.one will use 10% of the shares. Exchanges are the basis of EOS flow. Users put money on exchanges because of trust, but if the exchange votes are false, it may be easy to hide, I will be more willing to support the young BP.
如果发现交易所有不当的行为,Block.One会动用10%的票仓。交易所是EOS流动的基础,用户因为信任把钱放在交易所,但如果交易所票数虚假可能很容易被隐藏,我会更愿意支持年轻的BP。
The majority of EOS "whale" level positions are held by exchanges
二、EOS“鲸鱼🐳”级别持仓中交易所占大多数
![](https://img.haomeiwen.com/i3229514/95a7cc62267e33a0.jpeg)
Above is the early data, but the main online, this kind of whale level positions is not particularly large changes, which according to the statistics of tokenclub, top 10 accounted for 47.6% of the total voting blocs, top 30 accounted for 66.02%, top 100 accounted for 75.07%.
上图是比较早期的数据,但主网上线之后,这类鲸鱼级别的仓位并未发生特别大的变化,其中根据tokenclub的数据统计,前十名占到总票仓的47.6%,前30名占到了66.02%,前100名占到75.07%。
![](https://img.haomeiwen.com/i3229514/38f7d570385e6b03.jpeg)
![](https://img.haomeiwen.com/i3229514/c3c07d261ad53968.jpeg)
As is shown in the chart, the top 100 wallets have 10 exchanges, accounting for 22.5681 percent of the total votes cast.
如图所示,在排名前100的钱包中,交易所的占到十个,占总票数高达22.5681%.
Bitfinex addresses have two seats in the top 100, ranking 3 and 61 respectively. Gate-io has three, ranking 13, 33 and 40. There are three COINS: 6, 15 and 67. The addresses of okex and bigone show that although there is only one in the top 100, they are all in the top 10, 5 and 8 respectively.
Bitfinex地址在前100名中有占有两个席位,排名分别是3和61;Gate.io有三个,排名分别是13、33和40;币安有三个,分别是6、15和67;Okex和Bigone的地址显示虽然在前一百名只有一个,但排名都在前十大,分别是5和8。
This situation is mainly caused by the support for EOS and the base of exchange users before the main network goes online.
持仓情况造成这样的状况,主要归因于主网上线之前针对EOS空投支持与否及交易所用户量基数所致。
In addition, there is another important reason is that it is well known that the EOS provids online time, like most speculation speculation will choose in the layout before, after a lot of selling, this part of the chip can do band in exchange and futures, this is also attract a lot of people will be the cause of the chips on the exchange, can be seen from the chart the third circle, the downside is basic to vote and EOS themselves do not understand, the behavior of the speculative people want to do.
另外,还有一个重要的原因是,众所周知,EOS主网上线的时间确定性,大部分投机喜欢投机的人会选择在之前布局,之后又大量抛售,这一部分筹码在交易所可以做波段和期货,这也是吸引很多人将筹码放在交易所的原因,从下图第三个圆圈可以看出,那段的下行基本是对投票和EOS本身不了解,只想投机的人所做的行为。
In addition to the risk of saving private keys themselves and the ambiguous attitude of major wallets towards EOS airdrops, a wide range of token holders are also placed on exchanges for convenience.
加上自己保存私钥的风险,以及各大钱包对EOS空投的不明确态度,导致广泛的token持有者为求简便也放在交易所。
![](https://img.haomeiwen.com/i3229514/87652a2c588edfaf.jpeg)
Speculation on the sale of tickets and doubts on governance caused the phenomenon of selling
三、投机票的抛售及对治理的疑惑造成抛售现象
The escape of speculation ticket warehouse, the understanding and misunderstanding of governance and arbitration, as well as the reports of various unknown media, have resulted in large price fluctuations (as shown in circle 4 in the figure above). Doubts about the governance model, as well as the fairness and impartiality of participants, have also led to doubts about the success of eos and caused some selling phenomena.
投机票仓的脱逃、对治理及仲裁的了解和理解偏差,还有各路媒体不明所以的报道,造成价格的大幅度波动(如上图中圈4)。对于治理模式的质疑,以及参与方的公平公正性,也造成了各界对EOS能否成功的疑惑,也造成了部分的抛售现象。
对于治理,近期参加峰会的v神也发表了自己的观点:
(全文链接)
![](https://img.haomeiwen.com/i3229514/4784c57f258d4519.jpeg)
Yochai Benkler, a law professor at New York university, is perhaps the greatest communications theorist of our time. He divided the communication hall into three layers, the bottom of which was the "physical" layer through which information was transmitted. The middle layer is the "logical" or "code" layer, the code that makes the hardware run. At the top is the "content" layer, which transmits real meaningful things over the Internet, including digital images, text, and so on.
纽约大学法学教授尤查·本科勒(Yochai Benkler),他或许也是当代最伟大的通信理论家。他将通信所拆分称成三层,最底层为“物理”层,信息通过它来传递。中间层就是“逻辑”层或“代码”层,即那些让硬件运行起来的代码。最顶层是“内容”层,即通过网线传输真正有意义的东西,包括数字图像、文本等等。
Now on EOS code and governance, it is the middle tier is free, BTC and eth just move on before the code to run, and the well-known eth also turn in the process of the pos in pow, v god also mentioned will join voted last year, this two days have the wind coming will join the arbitration mechanism, we tend to block chain is this world development inevitable arrival of a process.
现在EOS上代码和治理,就是这中间层都是自由的,之前BTC和ETH都仅仅是移靠代码来运行,而众所周知的ETH也在POW转POS的过程中,去年V神也提到会加入投票环节,这两天也有风传来会加入仲裁机制,我们更倾向于这是区块链世界发展必然到来的一个过程。
It is necessary to understand and view the innovative mode of "governance" in a multi-dimensional way for practitioners, followers and token holders of the whole blockchain.
之于整个区块链的从业者、关注者及token持有者,是要多了解和多维度的来看待“治理”这样创新模式。
![](https://img.haomeiwen.com/i3229514/4f26c91587007775.jpeg)
Is there no way to "control" BP's affairs on the big exchanges?
四、对大交易所“左右”BP的事情就没有办法了吗?
The answer is no. Update the eos constitution on Thomax Cox on (https://github.com/EOS-Mainnet/governance/blob/master/eosio.system/eosio.system-clause-constitution-rc.md Chinese ,In this paper, the principles of community governance are described in detail.
答案是否定的。在Thomax Cox在Github上更新EOS的Constitution(Github:英文版 ;中文版),里面对社区的治理原则做了详细的表述。
At the same time, on github, eosio.system constraints(https://github.com/EOS-Mainnet/governance/)Chinese .
同时在Github上,对eosio.system约束也有提及(英文版/中文版)。
![](https://img.haomeiwen.com/i3229514/368acd55ca5cfd73.jpeg)
Article IV - No Vote Buying.According to action-{{voterproducer}}, the exchange should prove that it has evidence of a proxy vote and that it has not accepted anything of value in exchange for a ticket.
第四条 不贿选。根据action - {{voterproducer}}交易所应当举证自己拥有被委托投票的证据,并且证明自己没有接受任何有价值的物品换取票。
![](https://img.haomeiwen.com/i3229514/6953027952a73734.jpeg)
![](https://img.haomeiwen.com/i3229514/740c723e52a1f5b2.jpeg)
![](https://img.haomeiwen.com/i3229514/15df573e58796383.jpeg)
In conclusion, under the above terms, if the exchange fails to prove that it has no interest binding, that bribery and assets are from customers, etc., it shall resign from BP.
综上,依据上述条款,交易所如果不能自证其在没有利益绑定、贿赂及资产均来自客户等上述三个条件,则要辞去BP。
Channels for complaints of perceived injustice in the community
五、对认为社区不公行为的投诉渠道
- Arbitration institution: ECAF
1、仲裁机构:ECAF
Thomas cox, speaking at the zoom meeting of the Chinese governance group, said the Ecaf could be called in to complain if there were questions about the exchange's vote.(https://eoscorearbitration.io/)
Thomas Cox在中文治理群的zoom会议里表示,如果对交易所的投票有质疑可以去ECAF投诉,请ECAF介入调查。官网:https://eoscorearbitration.io/ 。
Of course, the doubts about Ecaf have not been broken. At the same meeting, we also raised two core issues. First, there is not enough transparency and oversight of the Ecaf at the moment, he said. Second, Thomas believes that the biggest obstacle to governance right now is the lack of governance rules and awareness in the community. These are difficult and urgent, and it is possible to discuss the timing, fairness and impartiality of Ecaf treatment, and even whether it is suitable to serve as the arbitrator of eos.
当然,对于ecaf的质疑也一直没有断过,就在同次会议上,我们也提了两个核心问题。第一,现在对ecaf的透明度和监督官不够,托马斯回答目前正在拟定相关文件;第二,托马斯认为现在治理最大的障碍在于社区对治理规则和宣传度不够。这些是困难且紧迫,以及究竟ecaf处理时间及公平公正性,甚至其本身是不是适合担当eos的仲裁机构,都是可以探讨的。
![](https://img.haomeiwen.com/i3229514/fa23167ef375a449.jpeg)
2. The core content of arbitration is in:
2、关于仲裁的核心内容均在:
https://forums.eosgo.io/categories/dispute-resolution
3. Flow chart of handling common disputes
3、常见纠纷的处理流程图
【EOS Gov】 通过仲裁流程的例子看社区治理理念https://steemit.com/eos/@eoshenzhen/eos-gov
![](https://img.haomeiwen.com/i3229514/d39977191eff4e05.jpeg)
![](https://img.haomeiwen.com/i3229514/2f8f1711b68dda64.jpeg)
4. Governance map
4、治理地图
![](https://img.haomeiwen.com/i3229514/7cf0b8d6f799ec7d.jpeg)
5.The constitution gives the ECAF the right to settle arbitration cases
5、宪法对ECAF的解决仲裁案件的赋予权利
![](https://img.haomeiwen.com/i3229514/104f931791a11252.jpeg)
6、Ecaf rules and arbitration procedures: https://forums.eosgo.io/discussion/1010/proposal-for-rules-for-dispute-resolution
6、ECAF的规则及仲裁流程:
https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?__biz=MzUyNjcwMjY3NQ==&mid=2247484416&idx=1&sn=e768748a203610b372782eec28b64369&chksm=fa0b853ccd7c0c2a78fab83c201d9043670e95171818c2ef0ad833c5743ddd9a020e57d1c541#rd
7、Give an example of the arbitration process and details:
A walkthrough of an EOS Arbitration saga
7、举例说明仲裁流程及细节
【翻译|治理】举例让你了解有关EOS仲裁的故事
8、Wps on ecaf funding related articles:
Worker Proposal System (WPS) Charter Released
8、WPs对ECAF经费相关文章:
【翻译】EOSIO ECAF临时资金提案
【翻译】Worker Proposal System(WPS)章程发布
Governance is an important part of EOS, but not the only one. It is essentially a mechanism, a way to protect a system of assets on the chain. There is a solution to this compared to the large number of dead accounts and lost accounts. The whole chain of participants, BP and the responsibility of the candidate BP is the largest, itself of governance are very familiar with and participate in discussions and provide more opinions, each BP should reach the basic requirement of the constitution, but also make more than the basic basic requirements. Put forward their own opinions on the development of ecological whole, familiar with the process and channels, and eventually the entire network to do strongly does, to make it carry more high-quality project can truly make the value of the eos to the maximum.
对于EOS而言,治理是其重要的环节,但却不是唯一最重要的。它本质上是一个机制、一个方式,来保护链上资产的一套体系。这相较于之前大量死账户、丢失账户而言,有个一个解决的渠道。这整条链的参与方中,BP及候选BP的责任是最大的,本身对治理非常熟悉并多参与讨论和提供意见的,每个BP应达到宪法的基本要求,同时还要做出比基本要求更多的事情。对生态整个的发展提出自己的意见,熟悉流程和渠道,最终将整个网络做强做大,使其承载更多优质的项目才能真正让EOS的价值发挥到最大。
In addition, if you have any comments and Suggestions on our article, please leave a message in the background and make a unified change at an appropriate time in the future.
另外:如果对我们的文章有任何意见和建议,欢迎大家后台留言,未来将在合适时机做统一更改。
本文图片来源于网络
相关文章:
关于我们更多联系:
Website:https://eoshenzhen.io
Steem:https://steemit.com/@eoshenzhen
Busy:https://busy.org/@eoshenzhen
Telegram:https://t.me/eoshenzhen
Twitter:https://twitter.com/eostechlover
简书:EOS技术爱好者
新浪微博:EOSTechLover
EOShenzhen的投票账号:eoshenzhenio
网友评论