每次使用Handler发送一个Message的时候,最终会先调用MessageQueue的enqueueMessage方法将Message方法放入到MessageQueue里面,最后会调用Handler的mQueue的enqueueMessage方法。
MessageQueue类内部实现了两个Interface,一个静态内部类。
- 接口IdleHandler在消息队列没有消息时使用,处理poll状态时的动作
- 接口OnFileDescriptorEventListener在相应的文件状态改变(可读,可写,有错误)时被使用
- 静态内部类FileDescriptorRecord,记录相应文件状态改变时的监视器OnFileDescriptorEventListener,在被native方法调用的dispatchEvents方法里被调用,执行监视器
在android中,Handler负责发送message到messageQueue,Handler包括looper,looper中创建的MessageQueue。Looper在新的线程中需要先prepare,然后启动loop循环,loop循环就是不断的从messageQueue中取出待处理message。
首先 enqueueMessage
boolean enqueueMessage(Message msg, long when) {
if (msg.target == null) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Message must have a target.");
}
if (msg.isInUse()) {
throw new IllegalStateException(msg + " This message is already in use.");
}
synchronized (this) {
if (mQuitting) {
IllegalStateException e = new IllegalStateException(
msg.target + " sending message to a Handler on a dead thread");
Log.w(TAG, e.getMessage(), e);
msg.recycle();
return false;
}
msg.markInUse();
msg.when = when;
Message p = mMessages;
boolean needWake;
if (p == null || when == 0 || when < p.when) {
// New head, wake up the event queue if blocked.
msg.next = p;
mMessages = msg;
needWake = mBlocked;
} else {
// Inserted within the middle of the queue. Usually we don't have to wake
// up the event queue unless there is a barrier at the head of the queue
// and the message is the earliest asynchronous message in the queue.
needWake = mBlocked && p.target == null && msg.isAsynchronous();
Message prev;
for (;;) {
prev = p;
p = p.next;
if (p == null || when < p.when) {
break;
}
if (needWake && p.isAsynchronous()) {
needWake = false;
}
}
msg.next = p; // invariant: p == prev.next
prev.next = msg;
}
// We can assume mPtr != 0 because mQuitting is false.
if (needWake) {
nativeWake(mPtr);
}
}
return true;
}
整个enqueueMessage方法的过程就是先持有MessageQueue.this锁,然后将Message放入队列中,放入队列的过程是:
-
如果队列为空,或者当前处理的时间点为0(when的数值,when表示Message将要执行的时间点),或者当前Message需要处理的时间点先于队列中的首节点,那么就将Message放入队列首部,否则进行第2步。
-
遍历队列中Message,找到when比当前Message的when大的Message,将Message插入到该Message之前,如果没找到则将Message插入到队列最后。
-
判断是否需要唤醒,一般是当前队列为空的情况下,next那边会进入睡眠,需要enqueue这边唤醒next函数。后面会详细介绍
接下来是取出message的方法 next
Message next() {
// Return here if the message loop has already quit and been disposed.
// This can happen if the application tries to restart a looper after quit
// which is not supported.
final long ptr = mPtr;
if (ptr == 0) {
return null;
}
int pendingIdleHandlerCount = -1; // -1 only during first iteration
int nextPollTimeoutMillis = 0;
for (;;) {
if (nextPollTimeoutMillis != 0) {
Binder.flushPendingCommands();
}
nativePollOnce(ptr, nextPollTimeoutMillis);
synchronized (this) {
// Try to retrieve the next message. Return if found.
final long now = SystemClock.uptimeMillis();
Message prevMsg = null;
Message msg = mMessages;
if (msg != null && msg.target == null) {
// Stalled by a barrier. Find the next asynchronous message in the queue.
do {
prevMsg = msg;
msg = msg.next;
} while (msg != null && !msg.isAsynchronous());
}
if (msg != null) {
if (now < msg.when) {
// Next message is not ready. Set a timeout to wake up when it is ready.
nextPollTimeoutMillis = (int) Math.min(msg.when - now, Integer.MAX_VALUE);
} else {
// Got a message.
mBlocked = false;
if (prevMsg != null) {
prevMsg.next = msg.next;
} else {
mMessages = msg.next;
}
msg.next = null;
if (DEBUG) Log.v(TAG, "Returning message: " + msg);
msg.markInUse();
return msg;
}
} else {
// No more messages.
nextPollTimeoutMillis = -1;
}
// Process the quit message now that all pending messages have been handled.
if (mQuitting) {
dispose();
return null;
}
// If first time idle, then get the number of idlers to run.
// Idle handles only run if the queue is empty or if the first message
// in the queue (possibly a barrier) is due to be handled in the future.
if (pendingIdleHandlerCount < 0
&& (mMessages == null || now < mMessages.when)) {
pendingIdleHandlerCount = mIdleHandlers.size();
}
if (pendingIdleHandlerCount <= 0) {
// No idle handlers to run. Loop and wait some more.
mBlocked = true;
continue;
}
if (mPendingIdleHandlers == null) {
mPendingIdleHandlers = new IdleHandler[Math.max(pendingIdleHandlerCount, 4)];
}
mPendingIdleHandlers = mIdleHandlers.toArray(mPendingIdleHandlers);
}
// Run the idle handlers.
// We only ever reach this code block during the first iteration.
for (int i = 0; i < pendingIdleHandlerCount; i++) {
final IdleHandler idler = mPendingIdleHandlers[i];
mPendingIdleHandlers[i] = null; // release the reference to the handler
boolean keep = false;
try {
keep = idler.queueIdle();
} catch (Throwable t) {
Log.wtf(TAG, "IdleHandler threw exception", t);
}
if (!keep) {
synchronized (this) {
mIdleHandlers.remove(idler);
}
}
}
// Reset the idle handler count to 0 so we do not run them again.
pendingIdleHandlerCount = 0;
// While calling an idle handler, a new message could have been delivered
// so go back and look again for a pending message without waiting.
nextPollTimeoutMillis = 0;
}
}
整个next函数的主要是执行步骤是:
-
step1: 初始化操作,如果mPtr为null,则直接返回null,设置nextPollTimeoutMillis为0,进入下一步。
-
step2: 调用nativePollOnce, nativePollOnce有两个参数,第一个为mPtr表示native层MessageQueue的指针,nextPollTimeoutMillis表示超时返回时间,调用这个nativePollOnce会等待wake,如果超过nextPollTimeoutMillis时间,则不管有没有被唤醒都会返回。-1表示一直等待,0表示立刻返回。
-
step3: 获取队列的头Message(msg),如果头Message的target为null,则查找一个异步Message来进行下一步处理。当队列中添加了同步Barrier的时候target会为null。
-
step4: 判断上一步获取的msg是否为null,为null说明当前队列中没有msg,设置等待时间nextPollTimeoutMillis为-1。实际上是等待enqueueMessage的nativeWake来唤醒,执行step4。如果非null,则下一步
-
step5: 判断msg的执行时间(when)是否比当前时间(now)的大,如果小,则将msg从队列中移除,并且返回msg,结束。如果大则设置等待时间nextPollTimeoutMillis为(int) Math.min(msg.when - now, Integer.MAX_VALUE),执行时间与当前时间的差与MAX_VALUE的较小值。执行下一步
-
step6: 判断是否MessageQueue是否已经取消,如果取消的话则返回null,否则下一步
-
step7: 运行idle Handle,idle表示当前有空闲时间的时候执行,而运行到这一步的时候,表示消息队列处理已经是出于空闲时间了(队列中没有Message,或者头部Message的执行时间(when)在当前时间之后)。如果没有idle,则继续step2,如果有则执行idleHandler的queueIdle方法,我们可以自己添加IdleHandler到MessageQueue里面(addIdleHandler方法),执行完后,回到step2。
native方法
// 定义在 frameworks/base/core/jni/android_os_MessageQueue.cpp 中,在构造函数中被调用,
// 它创建了一个native层的Looper。Looper的源码在system/core/libutils/Looper.cpp。
// Looper通过epoll_create创建了一个mEpollFd作为epoll的fd,并且创建了一个mWakeEventFd,
// 用来监听java层的wake,同时可以通过Looper的addFd方法来添加新的fd监听。
private native static long nativeInit();
private native static void nativeDestroy(long ptr);
// 这个方法的native层方法最终会调用Looper的pollOnce,具体实现在下面给出
private native void nativePollOnce(long ptr, int timeoutMillis); /*non-static for callbacks*/
// 调用的是Looper.cpp中的wake方法
private native static void nativeWake(long ptr);
private native static boolean nativeIsPolling(long ptr);
private native static void nativeSetFileDescriptorEvents(long ptr, int fd, int events);
int Looper::pollOnce(int timeoutMillis, int* outFd, int* outEvents, void** outData) {
int result = 0;
for (;;) {
while (mResponseIndex < mResponses.size()) {
const Response& response = mResponses.itemAt(mResponseIndex++);
int ident = response.request.ident;
if (ident >= 0) {
int fd = response.request.fd;
int events = response.events;
void* data = response.request.data;
#if DEBUG_POLL_AND_WAKE
ALOGD("%p ~ pollOnce - returning signalled identifier %d: "
"fd=%d, events=0x%x, data=%p",
this, ident, fd, events, data);
#endif
if (outFd != NULL) *outFd = fd;
if (outEvents != NULL) *outEvents = events;
if (outData != NULL) *outData = data;
return ident;
}
}
if (result != 0) {
#if DEBUG_POLL_AND_WAKE
ALOGD("%p ~ pollOnce - returning result %d", this, result);
#endif
if (outFd != NULL) *outFd = 0;
if (outEvents != NULL) *outEvents = 0;
if (outData != NULL) *outData = NULL;
return result;
}
result = pollInner(timeoutMillis);
}
}
int Looper::pollInner(int timeoutMillis) {
#if DEBUG_POLL_AND_WAKE
ALOGD("%p ~ pollOnce - waiting: timeoutMillis=%d", this, timeoutMillis);
#endif
// Adjust the timeout based on when the next message is due.
if (timeoutMillis != 0 && mNextMessageUptime != LLONG_MAX) {
nsecs_t now = systemTime(SYSTEM_TIME_MONOTONIC);
int messageTimeoutMillis = toMillisecondTimeoutDelay(now, mNextMessageUptime);
if (messageTimeoutMillis >= 0
&& (timeoutMillis < 0 || messageTimeoutMillis < timeoutMillis)) {
timeoutMillis = messageTimeoutMillis;
}
#if DEBUG_POLL_AND_WAKE
ALOGD("%p ~ pollOnce - next message in %" PRId64 "ns, adjusted timeout: timeoutMillis=%d",
this, mNextMessageUptime - now, timeoutMillis);
#endif
}
// Poll.
int result = POLL_WAKE;
mResponses.clear();
mResponseIndex = 0;
// We are about to idle.
mPolling = true;
struct epoll_event eventItems[EPOLL_MAX_EVENTS];
int eventCount = epoll_wait(mEpollFd, eventItems, EPOLL_MAX_EVENTS, timeoutMillis);
// No longer idling.
mPolling = false;
// Acquire lock.
mLock.lock();
// Rebuild epoll set if needed.
if (mEpollRebuildRequired) {
mEpollRebuildRequired = false;
rebuildEpollLocked();
goto Done;
}
// Check for poll error.
if (eventCount < 0) {
if (errno == EINTR) {
goto Done;
}
ALOGW("Poll failed with an unexpected error, errno=%d", errno);
result = POLL_ERROR;
goto Done;
}
// Check for poll timeout.
if (eventCount == 0) {
#if DEBUG_POLL_AND_WAKE
ALOGD("%p ~ pollOnce - timeout", this);
#endif
result = POLL_TIMEOUT;
goto Done;
}
// Handle all events.
#if DEBUG_POLL_AND_WAKE
ALOGD("%p ~ pollOnce - handling events from %d fds", this, eventCount);
#endif
for (int i = 0; i < eventCount; i++) {
int fd = eventItems[i].data.fd;
uint32_t epollEvents = eventItems[i].events;
if (fd == mWakeEventFd) {
if (epollEvents & EPOLLIN) {
awoken();
} else {
ALOGW("Ignoring unexpected epoll events 0x%x on wake event fd.", epollEvents);
}
} else {
ssize_t requestIndex = mRequests.indexOfKey(fd);
if (requestIndex >= 0) {
int events = 0;
if (epollEvents & EPOLLIN) events |= EVENT_INPUT;
if (epollEvents & EPOLLOUT) events |= EVENT_OUTPUT;
if (epollEvents & EPOLLERR) events |= EVENT_ERROR;
if (epollEvents & EPOLLHUP) events |= EVENT_HANGUP;
pushResponse(events, mRequests.valueAt(requestIndex));
} else {
ALOGW("Ignoring unexpected epoll events 0x%x on fd %d that is "
"no longer registered.", epollEvents, fd);
}
}
}
Done: ;
// Invoke pending message callbacks.
mNextMessageUptime = LLONG_MAX;
while (mMessageEnvelopes.size() != 0) {
nsecs_t now = systemTime(SYSTEM_TIME_MONOTONIC);
const MessageEnvelope& messageEnvelope = mMessageEnvelopes.itemAt(0);
if (messageEnvelope.uptime <= now) {
// Remove the envelope from the list.
// We keep a strong reference to the handler until the call to handleMessage
// finishes. Then we drop it so that the handler can be deleted *before*
// we reacquire our lock.
{ // obtain handler
sp<MessageHandler> handler = messageEnvelope.handler;
Message message = messageEnvelope.message;
mMessageEnvelopes.removeAt(0);
mSendingMessage = true;
mLock.unlock();
#if DEBUG_POLL_AND_WAKE || DEBUG_CALLBACKS
ALOGD("%p ~ pollOnce - sending message: handler=%p, what=%d",
this, handler.get(), message.what);
#endif
handler->handleMessage(message);
} // release handler
mLock.lock();
mSendingMessage = false;
result = POLL_CALLBACK;
} else {
// The last message left at the head of the queue determines the next wakeup time.
mNextMessageUptime = messageEnvelope.uptime;
break;
}
}
// Release lock.
mLock.unlock();
// Invoke all response callbacks.
for (size_t i = 0; i < mResponses.size(); i++) {
Response& response = mResponses.editItemAt(i);
if (response.request.ident == POLL_CALLBACK) {
int fd = response.request.fd;
int events = response.events;
void* data = response.request.data;
#if DEBUG_POLL_AND_WAKE || DEBUG_CALLBACKS
ALOGD("%p ~ pollOnce - invoking fd event callback %p: fd=%d, events=0x%x, data=%p",
this, response.request.callback.get(), fd, events, data);
#endif
// Invoke the callback. Note that the file descriptor may be closed by
// the callback (and potentially even reused) before the function returns so
// we need to be a little careful when removing the file descriptor afterwards.
int callbackResult = response.request.callback->handleEvent(fd, events, data);
if (callbackResult == 0) {
removeFd(fd, response.request.seq);
}
// Clear the callback reference in the response structure promptly because we
// will not clear the response vector itself until the next poll.
response.request.callback.clear();
result = POLL_CALLBACK;
}
}
return result;
}
这是一个很大的方法,具体过程如下:
- 调用epoll_wait方法等待所监听的fd的写入,可参考epoll
- 如果epoll_wait返回了,那么可能是出错返回,可能是超时返回,可能是有事件返回,如果是前两种情况跳转到Done处。
- 否则,会判断事件是否是mWakeEventFd(唤醒的时候写入的文件)做不同处理。如果是,则调用awoken方法,读取Looper.wake写入的内容,否则通过pushResponse读取,并将内容放入 Response中
- 处理NativeMessageQueue的消息,这些消息是native层的消息
- 处理pushResponse写入的内容。
SyncBarrier 同步消息屏障
当消息队列的第一个Message的target的时候,表示它是一个SyncBarrier,它会阻拦同步消息,而选择队列中第一个异步消息处理,如果没有则会阻塞。表示第一个Message是SyncBarrier的时候,会只处理异步消息,这时异步消息优先被处理,保证了用户体验,是在scheduleTraversal方法中被设置的
void scheduleTraversals() {
if (!mTraversalScheduled) {
mTraversalScheduled = true;
mTraversalBarrier = mHandler.getLooper().getQueue().postSyncBarrier();
mChoreographer.postCallback(
Choreographer.CALLBACK_TRAVERSAL, mTraversalRunnable, null);
if (!mUnbufferedInputDispatch) {
scheduleConsumeBatchedInput();
}
notifyRendererOfFramePending();
pokeDrawLockIfNeeded();
}
}
//Choreographer.postCallback会调用该方法
private void postCallbackDelayedInternal(int callbackType,
Object action, Object token, long delayMillis) {
...
Message msg = mHandler.obtainMessage(MSG_DO_SCHEDULE_CALLBACK, action);
msg.arg1 = callbackType;
msg.setAsynchronous(true);//设置为异步,不被屏障影响
mHandler.sendMessageAtTime(msg, dueTime);
...
}
同时我们看到在 doTraversal中会removeSyncBarrier,doTraversal 会调用performTraversals,也就是measure、layout、draw,而doTraversal是在 TraversalRunnable 中被调用的。
因此可以得出结论,当系统开始绘制ViewTree时将会向UI线程的消息队列中插入同步屏障以阻塞有关UI消息的执行
mChoreagrapher.postCallback 方式实际上调用的仍然是Handler.sendMessageAtTime, 只不过其带有的 mTraversalRunnable 的Message被设置了setAsynchronous异步消息,同步屏障不会影响其执行。也就是说ViewRootImpl 通过Handler机制中的同步屏障保证View绘制优先执行
场景
当在activity启动时,需要加载界面,其中有一个图片要加载到一个ImageView中,为了提高效率,同时执行界面和图片的加载,那图片加载必须要在界面加载结束后才可以设置到ImageView中,此时可以通过消息屏障来实现。
网友评论