PerformSelector:onThread:withObj

作者: Shawn_Wang | 来源:发表于2016-01-21 23:07 被阅读1644次

    performSelector:onThread:withObject:waitUntilDone理解

    直接看代码

    //
    //  ViewController.m
    //  RunLoopDemo
    //
    
    #import "ViewController.h"
    
    @interface ViewController ()
    @property (nonatomic, assign) BOOL isAborted;
    @end
    
    @implementation ViewController
    
    - (void)viewDidLoad {
        [super viewDidLoad];
        [self threadInfo:@"UI"];
        
        _isAborted = NO;
        NSThread *thread = [[NSThread alloc] initWithTarget:self selector:@selector(newThread:) object:nil];
        [thread start];
    //    When performing a selector on another thread, the target must have an active run loop
        [self performSelector:@selector(test:) onThread:thread withObject:nil waitUntilDone:NO];
    }
    
    - (void)newThread:(id)obj {
        @autoreleasepool {
            NSRunLoop *currentRunLoop = [NSRunLoop currentRunLoop];
            while (!_isAborted) {
                [currentRunLoop runMode:NSDefaultRunLoopMode beforeDate:[NSDate distantFuture]];
            }
            NSLog(@"线程停止");
        }
    }
    
    - (void)test:(id)obj {
        [self threadInfo:@"test"];
        _isAborted = YES;
    }
    
    - (void)threadInfo:(NSString *)info {
        NSLog(@"%@--%@", info, [NSThread currentThread]);
    }
    
    - (void)didReceiveMemoryWarning {
        [super didReceiveMemoryWarning];
    }
    
    @end
    
    

    有的人无法理解为什么要通过[self performSelector:@selector(test:) onThread:thread withObject:nil waitUntilDone:NO];中的test:方法来更新_isAborted状态。为什么不在[thread start]之后直接调用。原因其实是这里通过selector方法将其设置成yes的原因是虽然设置为yes,但是这时候runloop所在的线程其实是并不知道_isNewThreadAborted被重新赋值了。runloop没有被任务事件唤醒。所以正确的方法是通过使用selector来唤醒Runloop。 并且要注意,在执行performSelector:onThread:withObject:waitUntilDone方法时候,如果是在另外一个线程执行,必须保证另外的线程是有一个runloop.具体的使用可以参考AFNetworking.

    相关文章

      网友评论

        本文标题:PerformSelector:onThread:withObj

        本文链接:https://www.haomeiwen.com/subject/tpnlkttx.html