美文网首页
LoRA vs Dreambooth vs Textual In

LoRA vs Dreambooth vs Textual In

作者: 葱烧烙饼 | 来源:发表于2023-02-19 00:18 被阅读0次

    这几个东西的用法实在是比较像,让人搞不懂具体原因,今天查了这几个功能的原理,下面链接是讲的最简单清晰的。

    https://www.油土比.com/watch?v=dVjMiJsuR5o

    Textual Inversion - Captures a likeness, or a particular style. Multiple Textual Inversions can be called in your prompt, and they combine (if they're Styles), somewhat.

    Hypernetworks - Affect the image as a whole - like overlaying a filter on top of the image. This can be to capture an artist's style, or to apply a cinematic look (noir, etc.). They can technically capture a likeness, but I think they're far more useful to capture a style.

    LoRA - LoRA, or "Low-Rank Adaptation for Fast Text-to-Image Diffusion Fine Tuning" is a training method, much like Textual Inversion, but it creates a kind of mini-checkpoint. They're meant to be quicker and more forgiving to train than a TI. It can capture a subject, or a style, or both - and can be called in your prompt just like a Textual Inversion. You can also combine it with textual inversion, like so;

    from:
    https://civitai.com/questions/125/textual-inversions-hypernetworks-and-loras-oh-my

    相关文章

      网友评论

          本文标题:LoRA vs Dreambooth vs Textual In

          本文链接:https://www.haomeiwen.com/subject/uefikdtx.html