Are Your Electricians Safety-Trained?你们的电工受过安全培训吗?
OSHA andNFPA provide the guidelines, but our survey suggests there is still some room forelectrical-safety training improvement.
OSHA和NFPA提供指导，而调查显示这对于电气安全培训仍有一定的改进空间
When electrical systems are in question,anyone would be hard pressed to support any compromise in safety shouldmaintenance work be required. To develop a picture of electrical safety in themanufacturing arena, we surveyed the readers of Maintenance Technology todetermine their knowledge of electrical-system events/activities in theirfacilities. More than 230 professionals took time to respond. The surveyresults are presented below.
当电气系统出现问题时，若需进行维护工作，所有人都必须紧急支援填补所有安全漏洞。为了在生产区域规划一个的电气安全蓝图，我们对维修技术领域的读者进行了调查，确保他们对自己设施内的电气系统事件/活动的认识。超过230名专业人员参与了调查。调查结果如下图所示。
While the responses were overwhelminglypositive in terms of system knowledge and safety, there were enough of the“other” responses to suggest some element of training, either initial orongoing, is in order. According to the electrical-training experts at AVOInstitute, Dallas (avotraining.com), compliance with OSHA and NFPA 70Eregulations is not optional. In addition, NFPA 70E stipulates that retraining,not refresher courses, must occur every three years.
在系统知识和安全方面，虽然得到的回应已经非常正面了，仍有足够的“其他”的回应表明无论是初始还是后续的培训都是需要开展的。据AVO协会的电气培训专家Dallas(avotraining.com)称，OSHA和NFPA 70E的条例是必须遵从的。另外，NFPA 70E规定，每三年需要进行一次再培训（非进修课程）
Ask your team members to take the samesurvey. Your results will tell you whether training needs are immediate or ifyou’ve been doing your job well and additional training can be scheduled downthe road.
—Gary L. Parr, editorial director
让你团队里的成员进行同样的调查。调查结果会告诉你到底是团队内目前有紧急的培训需求，还是你目前在培训方面已经做的够好了，可以开始准备以后的额外培训工作。
—Gary L. Parr, 编辑主任
您的公司是否做过入射能/弧闪危害分析？
有 – 62%
没有 – 27%
不确定 – 11%
这项分析是否符合NFPA 70E?
符合 – 79%
不符合 – 7%
不确定 – 14%
您是否知道此项分析是由专业注册工程师执行的吗？
是 – 77%
不是 – 8%
不确定 – 15%
你是否知道如何解读电弧闪光标签的数据？
知道 – 84%
不知道 – 16%
你是否知道当执行任务时需要什么类型的个人防护装备？
知道– 93%
不知道– 7%
了解更多关于设备管理相关信息，请添加学府WeChat : shareford_tnpm
文章来源互联网，本文内容为原作者观点，并不代表本公众号立场。
网友评论