说明
在第一份工作中,我经历了我的第一个商用的项目,是一个微服务模块(后台管理模块),我所在的团队做的是南方电网的项目。不扯远了,当时我开始做的时候在想要以什么方式开发时,我的组长因担心项目到期出不了成品,所以催促我快点产出代码。之后就有了这篇文章,由于我为了赶进度而没有做单元测试,这导致了项目的后半部分bug产出数量随着代码的增加而增加,更郁闷地是修改之后为了配合前端都得去服务器部署一次,浪费的时间不比写单元测试少,也让我明白了单元测试的重要性。我的要求是让自己学会TDD测试驱动开发的开发习惯,且写下该文记录自己学习的历程。
该文将介绍单元测试框架Junit,模仿对象的框架Mockito。文章介绍核心的概念,感兴趣可以进入参考文章或者书籍进一步阅读。
参考文章以及书籍
《测试驱动开发》
Hamcrest 总结
深入JUnit源码之Rule
JUnit4.11 理论机制 @Theory 完整解读
Junit4.8之Category
Mockito官方文档中文版
Junit测试Controller-RESTful接口
IDEA代码覆盖率测试
测试驱动开发-TDD
也有人把这种流程称为极限编程。
测试驱动开发是使用测试框架的目的,能更好更快地让我们写完代码然后傲游二次元或者是出门做个现充。
碧海之蓝 -- 羞耻的生活喜剧番测试驱动开发指的是就是字面上的意思,用测试来驱动整个开发流程,也就是在写开发代码前先提前写测试代码,然后写业务代码来让测试通过。这里只是简单地概念性介绍,主要是要避免“开发后简单地验证结果”而转为“主动编写测试用例然后编写代码使用例通过”。
整个流程以就是不断重复下面几步:
|--->快速创建一个测试
|--->运行所有测试,发现新测试无法通过
|--->做一些细微的调整
|--->运行所有测试,所有测试通过
|--->重构代码,消除重复,优化代码结构
Junit
JUnit is a simple framework to write repeatable tests. It is an instance of the xUnit architecture for unit testing frameworks.
Junit是一个简单的测试框架,其官网涵盖大量的用例可以作为使用参考。/home/harry
Junit 4 官网的用例Assertions-断言机制
断言机制是判断结果是否正确的机制,总是以“assertXXXX”格式出现,只要有一条验证结果与预想不匹配,则测试不通过。
Hamcrest提供了其他的一些断言方式,请查看Hamcrest 总结。
import static org.hamcrest.CoreMatchers.allOf;
import static org.hamcrest.CoreMatchers.anyOf;
import static org.hamcrest.CoreMatchers.both;
import static org.hamcrest.CoreMatchers.containsString;
import static org.hamcrest.CoreMatchers.equalTo;
import static org.hamcrest.CoreMatchers.everyItem;
import static org.hamcrest.CoreMatchers.hasItems;
import static org.hamcrest.CoreMatchers.not;
import static org.hamcrest.CoreMatchers.sameInstance;
import static org.hamcrest.CoreMatchers.startsWith;
import static org.junit.Assert.assertArrayEquals;
import static org.junit.Assert.assertEquals;
import static org.junit.Assert.assertFalse;
import static org.junit.Assert.assertNotNull;
import static org.junit.Assert.assertNotSame;
import static org.junit.Assert.assertNull;
import static org.junit.Assert.assertSame;
import static org.junit.Assert.assertThat;
import static org.junit.Assert.assertTrue;
import java.util.Arrays;
import org.hamcrest.core.CombinableMatcher;
import org.junit.Test;
public class AssertTests {
@Test
public void testAssertArrayEquals() {
byte[] expected = "trial".getBytes();
byte[] actual = "trial".getBytes();
assertArrayEquals("failure - byte arrays not same", expected, actual);
}
@Test
public void testAssertEquals() {
assertEquals("failure - strings are not equal", "text", "text");
}
@Test
public void testAssertFalse() {
assertFalse("failure - should be false", false);
}
@Test
public void testAssertNotNull() {
assertNotNull("should not be null", new Object());
}
@Test
public void testAssertNotSame() {
assertNotSame("should not be same Object", new Object(), new Object());
}
@Test
public void testAssertNull() {
assertNull("should be null", null);
}
@Test
public void testAssertSame() {
Integer aNumber = Integer.valueOf(768);
assertSame("should be same", aNumber, aNumber);
}
// JUnit Matchers assertThat
@Test
public void testAssertThatBothContainsString() {
assertThat("albumen", both(containsString("a")).and(containsString("b")));
}
@Test
public void testAssertThatHasItems() {
assertThat(Arrays.asList("one", "two", "three"), hasItems("one", "three"));
}
@Test
public void testAssertThatEveryItemContainsString() {
assertThat(Arrays.asList(new String[] { "fun", "ban", "net" }), everyItem(containsString("n")));
}
// Core Hamcrest Matchers with assertThat
@Test
public void testAssertThatHamcrestCoreMatchers() {
assertThat("good", allOf(equalTo("good"), startsWith("good")));
assertThat("good", not(allOf(equalTo("bad"), equalTo("good"))));
assertThat("good", anyOf(equalTo("bad"), equalTo("good")));
assertThat(7, not(CombinableMatcher.<Integer> either(equalTo(3)).or(equalTo(4))));
assertThat(new Object(), not(sameInstance(new Object())));
}
@Test
public void testAssertTrue() {
assertTrue("failure - should be true", true);
}
}
Runner-测试执行器
你写的测试代码都会在这些测试执行器中运行,Junit默认的执行器为BlockJUnit4ClassRunner,当你不指定时,就会使用这个类来运行测试。可以使用注解@RunWith(xxxx)来指定运行测试的执行器。
Suite组合测试
Suite测试在Junit中是测试一组测试用例,用途比较明确,就是有些操作是需要执行多个操作才能完成的,所以可以组成一个组来进行测试。
import org.junit.runner.RunWith;
import org.junit.runners.Suite;
@RunWith(Suite.class)
@Suite.SuiteClasses({
TestFeatureLogin.class,
TestFeatureLogout.class,
TestFeatureNavigate.class,
TestFeatureUpdate.class
})
public class FeatureTestSuite {
// the class remains empty,
// used only as a holder for the above annotations
}
指定期待异常
如果没有抛出指定异常则测试不通过。
@Test(expected = IndexOutOfBoundsException.class)
public void empty() {
new ArrayList<Object>().get(0);
}
忽略测试
可以让测试暂时失效。
@Ignore("Test is ignored as a demonstration")
@Test
public void testSame() {
assertThat(1, is(1));
}
测试失效时间
@Test(timeout=1000)
public void testWithTimeout() {
...
}
Rule机制
JUnit中的Rule是对@BeforeClass、@AfterClass、@Before、@After等注解的另一种实现,其中@ClassRule实现的功能和@BeforeClass、@AfterClass类似;@Rule实现的功能和@Before、@after类似。JUnit引入@ClassRule和@Rule注解的关键是想让以前在@BeforeClass、@AfterClass、@Before、@After中的逻辑能更加方便的实现重用,因为@BeforeClass、@AfterClass、@Before、@After是将逻辑封装在一个测试类的方法中的,如果实现重用,需要自己将这些逻辑提取到一个单独的类中,再在这些方法中调用,而@ClassRule、@Rule则是将逻辑封装在一个类中,当需要使用时,直接赋值即可,对不需要重用的逻辑则可用匿名类实现,也因此,JUnit在接下来的版本中更倾向于多用@ClassRule和@Rule。
Junit @Rule和@ClassRule只能注解在字段上,且该字段必须实现TestRule接口,Junit提供了一些默认实现类。
深入JUnit源码之Rule类图 - 来源于博文《深入JUnit源码之Rule》public class DigitalAssetManagerTest {
@Rule
public final TemporaryFolder tempFolder = new TemporaryFolder();
@Rule
public final ExpectedException exception = ExpectedException.none();
@Test
public void countsAssets() throws IOException {
File icon = tempFolder.newFile("icon.png");
File assets = tempFolder.newFolder("assets");
createAssets(assets, 3);
DigitalAssetManager dam = new DigitalAssetManager(icon, assets);
assertEquals(3, dam.getAssetCount());
}
private void createAssets(File assets, int numberOfAssets) throws IOException {
for (int index = 0; index < numberOfAssets; index++) {
File asset = new File(assets, String.format("asset-%d.mpg", index));
Assert.assertTrue("Asset couldn't be created.", asset.createNewFile());
}
}
@Test
public void throwsIllegalArgumentExceptionIfIconIsNull() {
exception.expect(IllegalArgumentException.class);
exception.expectMessage("Icon is null, not a file, or doesn't exist.");
new DigitalAssetManager(null, null);
}
}
Theory机制
Theory是一个自动化填充参数并进行多次参数测试的一个机制,可以自己实现注解来定义参数。下面的代码中,定义了两个实参,而当测试 filenameIncludesUsername 方法时,形参username会被两个实参填充并各执行一次。
@RunWith(Theories.class)
public class UserTest {
@DataPoint
public static String GOOD_USERNAME = "optimus";
@DataPoint
public static String USERNAME_WITH_SLASH = "optimus/prime";
@Theory
public void filenameIncludesUsername(String username) {
assumeThat(username, not(containsString("/")));
assertThat(new User(username).configFileName(), containsString(username));
}
}
Test Fixture 测试固件
The test fixture is everything we need to have in place to exercise the SUT
Test Fixture(测试固件)是指一个测试运行所需的固定环境。
Fixtures 是测试中非常重要的一部分。他们的主要目的是建立一个固定/已知的环境状态以确保 测试可重复并且按照预期方式运行。Junit提供了一些方法来设置fixture,可以用来设置测试方法所需的环境数据等,允许你精确的定义你的Fixtures。大致上分为三类:
Test Fixtures
规则(Rules&RulesClass)
Theories
大致包含了如下过程
@BeforeClass setUpClass
@Before setUp
@Test test2()
@After tearDown
@Before setUp
@Test test1()
@After tearDown
@AfterClass tearDownClass
Category机制
一种级联的测试方式,
@IncludeCategory(XXX.class)可以包含@Category(XXX.class)
@ExcludeCategory(XXX.class)将会忽略@Category(XXX.class)
细节参照博文
Mock和Mockito
mock其实是一种工具的简称,他最大的功能是帮你把单元测试的耦合分解开,如果你的代码对另一个类或者接口有依赖,它能够帮你模拟这些依赖,并帮你验证所调用的依赖的行为。
对象间存在依赖关系 使用Mock来模仿对象,消除耦合关系下面的代码来自官网示例
1. 验证某些行为
// 静态导入会使代码更简洁
import static org.mockito.Mockito.*;
// mock creation 创建mock对象
List mockedList = mock(List.class);
//using mock object 使用mock对象
mockedList.add("one");
mockedList.clear();
//verification 验证
verify(mockedList).add("one");
verify(mockedList).clear();
2. 制作测试桩
//You can mock concrete classes, not only interfaces
// 你可以mock具体的类型,不仅只是接口
LinkedList mockedList = mock(LinkedList.class);
//stubbing
// 测试桩
when(mockedList.get(0)).thenReturn("first");
when(mockedList.get(1)).thenThrow(new RuntimeException());
//following prints "first"
// 输出“first”
System.out.println(mockedList.get(0));
//following throws runtime exception
// 抛出异常
System.out.println(mockedList.get(1));
//following prints "null" because get(999) was not stubbed
// 因为get(999) 没有打桩,因此输出null
System.out.println(mockedList.get(999));
//Although it is possible to verify a stubbed invocation, usually it's just redundant
//If your code cares what get(0) returns then something else breaks (often before even verify() gets executed).
//If your code doesn't care what get(0) returns then it should not be stubbed. Not convinced? See here.
// 验证get(0)被调用的次数
verify(mockedList).get(0);
默认情况下,所有的函数都有返回值。mock函数默认返回的是null,一个空的集合或者一个被对象类型包装的内置类型,例如0、false对应的对象类型为Integer、Boolean。
3. 参数匹配器(ArgumentMatchers)
//stubbing using built-in anyInt() argument matcher
// 使用内置的anyInt()参数匹配器
when(mockedList.get(anyInt())).thenReturn("element");
//stubbing using custom matcher (let's say isValid() returns your own matcher implementation):
// 使用自定义的参数匹配器( 在isValid()函数中返回你自己的匹配器实现 )
when(mockedList.contains(argThat(isValid()))).thenReturn("element");
//following prints "element"
// 输出element
System.out.println(mockedList.get(999));
//you can also verify using an argument matcher
// 你也可以验证参数匹配器
verify(mockedList).get(anyInt());
verify(mock).someMethod(anyInt(), anyString(), eq("third argument"));
//above is correct - eq() is also an argument matcher
// 上述代码是正确的,因为eq()也是一个参数匹配器
// 该示例展示了如何多次应用于测试桩函数的验证
参数匹配器使验证和测试桩变得更灵活,参考API文档。
4. 验证函数的确切、最少、从未调用次数
//using mock
mockedList.add("once");
mockedList.add("twice");
mockedList.add("twice");
mockedList.add("three times");
mockedList.add("three times");
mockedList.add("three times");
//following two verifications work exactly the same - times(1) is used by default
// 下面的两个验证函数效果一样,因为verify默认验证的就是times(1)
verify(mockedList).add("once");
verify(mockedList, times(1)).add("once");
//exact number of invocations verification
// 验证具体的执行次数
verify(mockedList, times(2)).add("twice");
verify(mockedList, times(3)).add("three times");
//verification using never(). never() is an alias to times(0)
// 使用never()进行验证,never相当于times(0)
verify(mockedList, never()).add("never happened");
//verification using atLeast()/atMost()
// 使用atLeast()/atMost()
verify(mockedList, atLeastOnce()).add("three times");
verify(mockedList, atLeast(2)).add("five times");
verify(mockedList, atMost(5)).add("three times");
5. 使用stub抛出异常
doThrow(new RuntimeException()).when(mockedList).clear();
//following throws RuntimeException:
// 调用这句代码会抛出异常
mockedList.clear();
6. 验证执行顺序
// A. Single mock whose methods must be invoked in a particular order
// A. 验证mock一个对象的函数执行顺序
List singleMock = mock(List.class);
//using a single mock
singleMock.add("was added first");
singleMock.add("was added second");
//create an inOrder verifier for a single mock
// 为该mock对象创建一个inOrder对象
InOrder inOrder = inOrder(singleMock);
//following will make sure that add is first called with "was added first, then with "was added second"
// 确保add函数首先执行的是add("was added first"),然后才是add("was added second")
inOrder.verify(singleMock).add("was added first");
inOrder.verify(singleMock).add("was added second");
// B. Multiple mocks that must be used in a particular order
// B .验证多个mock对象的函数执行顺序
List firstMock = mock(List.class);
List secondMock = mock(List.class);
//using mocks
firstMock.add("was called first");
secondMock.add("was called second");
//create inOrder object passing any mocks that need to be verified in order
// 为这两个Mock对象创建inOrder对象
InOrder inOrder = inOrder(firstMock, secondMock);
//following will make sure that firstMock was called before secondMock
// 验证它们的执行顺序
inOrder.verify(firstMock).add("was called first");
inOrder.verify(secondMock).add("was called second");
// Oh, and A + B can be mixed together at will
7. 确保交互(interaction)操作不会执行在mock对象上
//using mocks - only mockOne is interacted
// 使用Mock对象
mockOne.add("one");
//ordinary verification
// 普通验证
verify(mockOne).add("one");
//verify that method was never called on a mock
// 验证某个交互是否从未被执行
verify(mockOne, never()).add("two");
//verify that other mocks were not interacted
// 验证mock对象没有交互过
verifyZeroInteractions(mockTwo, mockThree);
8. 简化mock对象的创建
public class ArticleManagerTest {
@Mock private ArticleCalculator calculator;
@Mock private ArticleDatabase database;
@Mock private UserProvider userProvider;
private ArticleManager manager;
// 需要执行下面语句来初始化注解的使用
@Before
public void initMocks() {
MockitoAnnotations.initMocks(this);
}
//也可以在测试类加上注解@RunWith(MockitoJUnit44Runner.class)
//或者使用MockitoJUnitRunner
9. 为连续的调用做测试桩
when(mock.someMethod("some arg"))
.thenThrow(new RuntimeException())
.thenReturn("foo");
//First call: throws runtime exception:
// 第一次调用 : 抛出运行时异常
mock.someMethod("some arg");
//Second call: prints "foo"
// 第二次调用 : 输出"foo"
System.out.println(mock.someMethod("some arg"));
//Any consecutive call: prints "foo" as well (last stubbing wins).
// 后续调用 : 也是输出"foo"
System.out.println(mock.someMethod("some arg"));
// 简短的写法,第一次调用时返回"one",第二次返回"two",第三次返回"three"
when(mock.someMethod("some arg"))
.thenReturn("one", "two", "three");
10. 为回调做测试桩
Allows stubbing with generic Answer interface. 运行为泛型接口Answer打桩。
when(mock.someMethod(anyString())).thenAnswer(new Answer() {
Object answer(InvocationOnMock invocation) {
Object[] args = invocation.getArguments();
Object mock = invocation.getMock();
return "called with arguments: " + args;
}
});
//Following prints "called with arguments: foo"
// 输出 : "called with arguments: foo"
System.out.println(mock.someMethod("foo"));
11. 监控真实对象
你可以为真实对象创建一个监控(spy)对象。当你使用这个spy对象时真实的对象也会也调用,除非它的函数被stub了。
List list = new LinkedList();
List spy = spy(list);
//optionally, you can stub out some methods:
// 你可以为某些函数打桩
when(spy.size()).thenReturn(100);
//using the spy calls *real* methods
// 通过spy对象调用真实对象的函数
spy.add("one");
spy.add("two");
//prints "one" - the first element of a list
// 输出第一个元素
System.out.println(spy.get(0));
//size() method was stubbed - 100 is printed
// 因为size()函数被打桩了,因此这里返回的是100
System.out.println(spy.size());
//optionally, you can verify
// 交互验证
verify(spy).add("one");
verify(spy).add("two");
12. 为下一步的断言捕获参数(ArgumentCaptor)
ArgumentCaptor<Person> argument = ArgumentCaptor.forClass(Person.class);
// 参数捕获
verify(mock).doSomething(argument.capture());
// 使用equal断言
assertEquals("John", argument.getValue().getName());
13. TDD与BDD(行为驱动开发)结合使用
import static org.mockito.BDDMockito.*;
Seller seller = mock(Seller.class);
Shop shop = new Shop(seller);
public void shouldBuyBread() throws Exception {
//given
given(seller.askForBread()).willReturn(new Bread());
//when
Goods goods = shop.buyBread();
//then
assertThat(goods, containBread());
}
14. @Captor,@Spy,@ InjectMocks
@Captor 简化 ArgumentCaptor 的创建 - 当需要捕获的参数是一个令人讨厌的通用类,而且你想避免编译时警告。
@Spy - 你可以用它代替 spy(Object) 方法
@InjectMocks - 自动将模拟对象或侦查域注入到被测试对象中。需要注意的是 @InjectMocks 也能与 @Spy 一起使用,这就意味着 Mockito 会注入模拟对象到测试的部分测试中。它的复杂度也是你应该使用部分测试原因。
15. 验证超时
//passes when someMethod() is called within given time span
verify(mock, timeout(100)).someMethod();
//above is an alias to:
verify(mock, timeout(100).times(1)).someMethod();
//passes when someMethod() is called *exactly* 2 times within given time span
verify(mock, timeout(100).times(2)).someMethod();
//passes when someMethod() is called *at least* 2 times within given time span
verify(mock, timeout(100).atLeast(2)).someMethod();
//verifies someMethod() within given time span using given verification mode
//useful only if you have your own custom verification modes.
verify(mock, new Timeout(100, yourOwnVerificationMode)).someMethod();
以上内容,足以让我们使用Junit 4进行日常代码的单元测试
使用Junit + Mockito 对Service做单元测试
public interface RegisterUserService {
boolean insert(String passid,String msisdn,String email) throws SQLException;
}
@Service("registerUserService")
public class RegisterUserServiceImpl implements RegisterUserService {
private Logger loggor = Logger.getLogger(getClass());
@Autowired
private UserMapper userMapper;
@Autowired
private PassidUserMapper passidUserMapper;
@Autowired
@Qualifier("redisService")
private CacheService redisService;
@Override
@Transactional
public boolean insert(String passid, String msisdn, String email)
throws SQLException {
if (StringUtils.isEmpty(passid))
return false;
User user = new User();
if (!StringUtils.isEmpty(msisdn))
user.setPhoneNo(msisdn);
if (!StringUtils.isEmpty(email))
user.setEmail(email);
PassidUser passidUser = new PassidUser();
String serverCode = ServerCodeConfig.serverCodeMap
.get(PayUtil.ipAddress);
if (StringUtils.isEmpty(serverCode)) {
serverCode = "999";
}
String userid = serverCode + UIDUtil.next();
passidUser.setUserid(userid);
passidUser.setPassid(passid);
user.setPassid(passid);
user.setUserid(userid);
Date date = new Date();
user.setCreateTime(date);
user.setUpdateTime(date);
user.setDeleteFlag(0);
/*if(loggor.isInfoEnabled()){
loggor.info("passid:" + passid + " userid:" + userid + " msisdn:"
+ msisdn + " email:" + email);
}*/
int result = passidUserMapper.insert(passidUser);
if (passidUserMapper.insert(passidUser) > 0
&& userMapper.insertSelective(user) > 0)
redisService.set("passid:" + passid + ":userid", userid);
else
throw new SQLException("数据插入失败,数据回滚");
return true;
}
}
@RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class)
@WebAppConfiguration
@ContextConfiguration("file:src/main/resources/conf/springConfig.xml")
public class RegisterUserServiceImplTest {
@InjectMocks
private RegisterUserService registerUserService = new RegisterUserServiceImpl();
@Mock
private UserMapper userMapper;
@Mock
private PassidUserMapper passidUserMapper;
@Mock
private CacheService redisService;
@Before
public void setUp() {
MockitoAnnotations.initMocks(this);
when(passidUserMapper.insert(any(PassidUser.class))).thenReturn(1);
when(userMapper.insertSelective(any(User.class))).thenReturn(1);
}
@Test
public void testInsert() throws Exception {
String passid = "12344";
String msisdn = "18867131210";
String email = "test@test.cn";
Assert.assertTrue(registerUserService.insert(passid, msisdn, email));
}
}
使用SpringMVC,Junit, Mockito测试Controller(Restful接口)
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-context</artifactId>
<version>${spring.version}</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-webmvc</artifactId>
<version>${spring.version}</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>junit</groupId>
<artifactId>junit</artifactId>
<version>${junit.version}</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.hamcrest</groupId>
<artifactId>hamcrest-core</artifactId>
<version>${hamcrest.core.version}/version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.mockito</groupId>
<artifactId>mockito-core</artifactId>
<version>${mockito.core.version}</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-test</artifactId>
<version>${spring.version}</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
import org.apache.commons.logging.Log;
import org.apache.commons.logging.LogFactory;
import org.junit.Before;
import org.junit.runner.RunWith;
import org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.Autowired;
import org.springframework.http.MediaType;
import org.springframework.test.context.ContextConfiguration;
import org.springframework.test.context.junit4.SpringJUnit4ClassRunner;
import org.springframework.test.context.transaction.TransactionConfiguration;
import org.springframework.test.context.web.WebAppConfiguration;
import org.springframework.test.web.servlet.MockMvc;
import org.springframework.test.web.servlet.RequestBuilder;
import org.springframework.test.web.servlet.ResultActions;
import org.springframework.test.web.servlet.setup.MockMvcBuilders;
import org.springframework.transaction.annotation.Transactional;
import org.springframework.web.context.WebApplicationContext;
import static org.springframework.test.web.servlet.request.MockMvcRequestBuilders.get;
import static org.springframework.test.web.servlet.request.MockMvcRequestBuilders.post;
import static org.springframework.test.web.servlet.result.MockMvcResultHandlers.print;
import static org.springframework.test.web.servlet.result.MockMvcResultMatchers.status;
/**
* Created by zhengcanrui on 16/8/11.
*/
@RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class)
@ContextConfiguration(locations={"classpath:spring/applicationContext-*xml"})
//配置事务的回滚,对数据库的增删改都会回滚,便于测试用例的循环利用
@TransactionConfiguration(transactionManager = "transactionManager", defaultRollback = true)
@Transactional
@WebAppConfiguration
public class Test {
//记得配置log4j.properties ,的命令行输出水平是debug
protected Log logger= LogFactory.getLog(TestBase.class);
protected MockMvc mockMvc;
@Autowired
protected WebApplicationContext wac;
@Before() //这个方法在每个方法执行之前都会执行一遍
public void setup() {
mockMvc = MockMvcBuilders.webAppContextSetup(wac).build(); //初始化MockMvc对象
}
@org.junit.Test
public void getAllCategoryTest() throws Exception {
String responseString = mockMvc.perform(
get("/categories/getAllCategory") //请求的url,请求的方法是get
.contentType(MediaType.APPLICATION_FORM_URLENCODED) //数据的格式
.param("pcode","root") //添加参数
).andExpect(status().isOk()) //返回的状态是200
.andDo(print()) //打印出请求和相应的内容
.andReturn().getResponse().getContentAsString(); //将相应的数据转换为字符串
System.out.println("--------返回的json = " + responseString);
}
}
Spring MVC的测试往往看似比较复杂。其实他的不同在于,他需要一个ServletContext来模拟我们的请求和响应。
@webappconfiguration是一级注释,用于声明一个ApplicationContext集成测试加载WebApplicationContext。作用是模拟ServletContext。
@ContextConfiguration:因为controller,component等都是使用注解,需要注解指定spring的配置文件,扫描相应的配置,将类初始化等。
- perform:执行一个RequestBuilder请求,会自动执行SpringMVC的流程并映射到相应的控制器执行处理;
- get:声明发送一个get请求的方法。MockHttpServletRequestBuilder get(String urlTemplate, Object... urlVariables):根据uri模板和uri变量值得到一个GET请求方式的。另外提供了其他的请求的方法,如:post、put、delete等。
- param:添加request的参数,如上面发送请求的时候带上了了pcode = root的参数。假如使用需要发送json数据格式的时将不能使用这种方式,可见后面被@ResponseBody注解参数的解决方法
- andExpect:添加ResultMatcher验证规则,验证控制器执行完成后结果是否正确(对返回的数据进行的判断);
- andDo:添加ResultHandler结果处理器,比如调试时打印结果到控制台(对返回的数据进行的判断);
- andReturn:最后返回相应的MvcResult;然后进行自定义验证/进行下一步的异步处理(对返回的数据进行的判断);
写RESTful接口测试时需要注意返回的数据格式要标注成JSON : MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON
SoftInfo softInfo = new SoftInfo();
//设置值
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
ObjectWriter ow = mapper.writer().withDefaultPrettyPrinter();
java.lang.String requestJson = ow.writeValueAsString(softInfo);
String responseString = mockMvc.perform( post("/softs").contentType(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON).content(requestJson)).andDo(print())
.andExpect(status().isOk()).andReturn().getResponse().getContentAsString();
最后关于代码覆盖率
-
Intellij IDEA对这方面做了集成支持,右键运行测试代码
右键测试代码选择覆盖率测试 -
可以在包含有单元测试的代码中看到,绿色为已经覆盖的部分,红色未覆盖。
绿已覆盖,红未覆盖
网友评论