庖丁解BUG:focus search returned a v

作者: 陈蒙_ | 来源:发表于2019-06-12 20:40 被阅读27次

    问题表现

    在开发中遇到一个偶现的崩溃,日志堆栈如下:

    E/AndroidRuntime: FATAL EXCEPTION: main
        Process: com.example.edittextdemo, PID: 9528
        java.lang.IllegalStateException: focus search returned a view that wasn't able to take focus!
            at android.widget.TextView.onKeyUp(TextView.java:7591)
            at android.view.KeyEvent.dispatch(KeyEvent.java:2788)
            at android.view.View.dispatchKeyEvent(View.java:11780)
            at android.view.ViewGroup.dispatchKeyEvent(ViewGroup.java:1845)
            at android.view.ViewGroup.dispatchKeyEvent(ViewGroup.java:1845)
            at android.view.ViewGroup.dispatchKeyEvent(ViewGroup.java:1845)
            at android.view.ViewGroup.dispatchKeyEvent(ViewGroup.java:1845)
            at android.view.ViewGroup.dispatchKeyEvent(ViewGroup.java:1845)
            at android.view.ViewGroup.dispatchKeyEvent(ViewGroup.java:1845)
            at com.android.internal.policy.DecorView.superDispatchKeyEvent(DecorView.java:547)
            at com.android.internal.policy.PhoneWindow.superDispatchKeyEvent(PhoneWindow.java:1884)
            at android.app.Activity.dispatchKeyEvent(Activity.java:3430)
            at android.support.v7.app.AppCompatActivity.dispatchKeyEvent(AppCompatActivity.java:534)
            at android.support.v7.view.WindowCallbackWrapper.dispatchKeyEvent(WindowCallbackWrapper.java:58)
            at android.support.v7.app.AppCompatDelegateImplBase$AppCompatWindowCallbackBase.dispatchKeyEvent(AppCompatDelegateImplBase.java:316)
            at com.android.internal.policy.DecorView.dispatchKeyEvent(DecorView.java:421)
            at android.view.ViewRootImpl$ViewPostImeInputStage.processKeyEvent(ViewRootImpl.java:5371)
            at android.view.ViewRootImpl$ViewPostImeInputStage.onProcess(ViewRootImpl.java:5243)
            at android.view.ViewRootImpl$InputStage.deliver(ViewRootImpl.java:4737)
            at android.view.ViewRootImpl$InputStage.onDeliverToNext(ViewRootImpl.java:4790)
            at android.view.ViewRootImpl$InputStage.forward(ViewRootImpl.java:4756)
            at android.view.ViewRootImpl$AsyncInputStage.forward(ViewRootImpl.java:4887)
            at android.view.ViewRootImpl$InputStage.apply(ViewRootImpl.java:4764)
            at android.view.ViewRootImpl$AsyncInputStage.apply(ViewRootImpl.java:4944)
            at android.view.ViewRootImpl$InputStage.deliver(ViewRootImpl.java:4737)
            at android.view.ViewRootImpl$InputStage.onDeliverToNext(ViewRootImpl.java:4790)
            at android.view.ViewRootImpl$InputStage.forward(ViewRootImpl.java:4756)
            at android.view.ViewRootImpl$InputStage.apply(ViewRootImpl.java:4764)
            at android.view.ViewRootImpl$InputStage.deliver(ViewRootImpl.java:4737)
            at android.view.ViewRootImpl.deliverInputEvent(ViewRootImpl.java:7363)
            at android.view.ViewRootImpl.doProcessInputEvents(ViewRootImpl.java:7337)
            at android.view.ViewRootImpl.enqueueInputEvent(ViewRootImpl.java:7295)
            at android.view.ViewRootImpl$ViewRootHandler.handleMessage(ViewRootImpl.java:4315)
            at android.os.Handler.dispatchMessage(Handler.java:109)
            at android.os.Looper.loop(Looper.java:166)
            at android.app.ActivityThread.main(ActivityThread.java:7555)
            at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Native Method)
            at com.android.internal.os.RuntimeInit$MethodAndArgsCaller.run(RuntimeInit.java:469)
            at com.android.internal.os.ZygoteInit.main(ZygoteInit.java:963)
    

    复现路径

    解决任何缺陷,不仅仅是崩溃问题,解决问题的第一步都是找到复现路径。如果找到了稳定复现的路径,那么恭喜你:已经成功了一半了!

    对于本文中的崩溃问题,经过一层一层的抽丝剥茧,逐步剔除无关代码,终于在 Demo 工程中找到了稳定复现的路径。

    Demo 工程是个列表页,用 RecyclerView 实现,列表中有 3 种类型的 Item:TextView、仅支持数字类型输入的 EditText 和 CheckBox。

    当点击输入框后直接点击软键盘的回车按钮,必崩。完整代码和效果录屏分别如下:

    public class MainActivity extends AppCompatActivity {
    
        private static final String TAG = "MainActivity";
    
        @Override
        protected void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) {
            super.onCreate(savedInstanceState);
    
            RecyclerView rv = new RecyclerView(this);
            LinearLayoutManager lm = new LinearLayoutManager(this);
            rv.setLayoutManager(lm);
            rv.setLayoutParams(new RecyclerView.LayoutParams(ViewGroup.LayoutParams.MATCH_PARENT, ViewGroup.LayoutParams.MATCH_PARENT));
            DividerItemDecoration did = new DividerItemDecoration(this, lm.getOrientation());
            rv.addItemDecoration(did);
    
            ArrayList<Integer> data = new ArrayList<Integer>(10);
            for (int i = 0; i < 13; i++) {
                data.add(i);
            }
    
            rv.setAdapter(new MyAdapter(data));
    
            setContentView(rv);
        }
    
    
        class MyAdapter extends RecyclerView.Adapter {
            ArrayList<Integer> data;
            int viewTypeTextView, viewTypeEditText, viewTypeCheckbox;
    
            public MyAdapter(ArrayList<Integer> data) {
                this.data = data;
                viewTypeEditText = this.data.size() - 2;
                viewTypeCheckbox = this.data.size() - 1;
            }
    
            @Override
            public int getItemViewType(int position) {
                if (position == data.size() - 2) {
                    return viewTypeEditText;
    
                } else if (position == data.size() - 1) {
                    return viewTypeCheckbox;
    
                } else {
                    return viewTypeTextView;
                }
            }
    
            @NonNull
            @Override
            public RecyclerView.ViewHolder onCreateViewHolder(@NonNull ViewGroup viewGroup, int viewType) {
    
                View view;
    
                if (viewType == viewTypeEditText) {
                    view = buildEditText(viewGroup.getContext());
    
                } else if (viewTypeCheckbox == viewType) {
                    view = buildCheckbox(viewGroup.getContext());
    
                } else {
                    view = buildTextView(viewGroup.getContext());
                }
    
                return new MyHolder(view);
            }
    
            @Override
            public void onBindViewHolder(@NonNull final RecyclerView.ViewHolder viewHolder, int position) {
            }
    
            @Override
            public int getItemCount() {
                return data.size();
            }
    
            private View buildTextView(Context context) {
                TextView textView = new TextView(context);
                textView.setText("文本项");
                textView.setTextSize(20);
                textView.setGravity(Gravity.CENTER);
                textView.setLayoutParams(new RecyclerView.LayoutParams(ViewGroup.LayoutParams.MATCH_PARENT, ViewGroup.LayoutParams.WRAP_CONTENT));
                textView.setPadding(0, 50, 0, 50);
    
                return textView;
            }
    
            private View buildEditText(Context context) {
                EditText editText = new EditText(context);
                editText.setHint("输入框");
                editText.setInputType(EditorInfo.TYPE_CLASS_NUMBER);
                editText.setLayoutParams(new RecyclerView.LayoutParams(ViewGroup.LayoutParams.MATCH_PARENT, ViewGroup.LayoutParams.WRAP_CONTENT));
    
                return editText;
            }
    
            private View buildCheckbox(Context context) {
                CheckBox checkBox = new CheckBox(context);
                checkBox.setText("单选框");
                return checkBox;
            }
    
            class MyHolder extends RecyclerView.ViewHolder {
                public MyHolder(@NonNull View itemView) {
                    super(itemView);
                }
            }
        }
    }
    
    拥有13个文本项时会crash

    )

    奇怪的是,同样的代码,如果把文本控件的个数减少到 1 个,则不再出现崩溃,即将上面的代码仅仅做如下修改:

    ArrayList<Integer> data = new ArrayList<Integer>(10);
    for (int i = 0; i < 1; i++) {
        data.add(i);
    }
    
    只有1个文本时则不会崩溃

    对比之后,不免让人猜测:难道是否崩溃取决于单选框是否显示在屏幕中?即,当单选框出现在屏幕中时,不会崩溃?;否则会崩溃?我们来验证一下:在文本控件个数为13的场景下,滑动页面,将单选框展示在屏幕中,果然不会崩溃:

    拥有13个文本项但不会crash

    这是一个神奇的问题,激起了我征服她的欲望。

    问题原因

    我们先看下这个异常是从什么地方抛出来的。直接在源码中全局搜索异常关键字 focus search returned,发现总共有3处,全部集中在 TextView.java 中。

    前两处在 onEditorAction() 中:

    public void onEditorAction(int actionCode) {
        // omitted
            if (actionCode == EditorInfo.IME_ACTION_NEXT) {
                    View v = focusSearch(FOCUS_FORWARD);
                    if (v != null) {
                        if (!v.requestFocus(FOCUS_FORWARD)) {
                            throw new IllegalStateException("focus search returned a view "
                                    + "that wasn't able to take focus!");
                        }
                    }
                    return;
    
                } else if (actionCode == EditorInfo.IME_ACTION_PREVIOUS) {
                    View v = focusSearch(FOCUS_BACKWARD);
                    if (v != null) {
                        if (!v.requestFocus(FOCUS_BACKWARD)) {
                            throw new IllegalStateException("focus search returned a view "
                                    + "that wasn't able to take focus!");
                        }
                    }
                    return;
    
                }
       // omitted
    }
    

    最后一处在 onKeyUp() 中:

    @Override
    public boolean onKeyUp(int keyCode, KeyEvent event) {
                            // omitted
                            if (!hasOnClickListeners()) {
                                View v = focusSearch(FOCUS_DOWN);
    
                                if (v != null) {
                                    if (!v.requestFocus(FOCUS_DOWN)) {
                                        throw new IllegalStateException("focus search returned a view "
                                                + "that wasn't able to take focus!");
                                    }
    
                                    /*
                                     * Return true because we handled the key; super
                                     * will return false because there was no click
                                     * listener.
                                     */
                                    super.onKeyUp(keyCode, event);
                                    return true;
                                }
                            }
                            // omitted
    }
    

    根据堆栈日志,我们可以看出实际抛出异常的地方是 onKeyUp() 这个方法。

    仅仅从代码中我们可以看到,抛出该异常的前提是 !hasOnClickListeners() = true,最简单粗暴的解决该崩溃的方法就是给 EditText 设置一个 OnClickListener,让代码运行不到抛出异常的地方,也就不会崩溃了,虽然不优雅,但是有效,可以应急。

    我们都是有追求的程序员,不会这么浅尝辄止、得过且过,接着往下看。关键代码在于如下几行:

                                View v = focusSearch(FOCUS_DOWN);
    
                                if (v != null) {
                                    if (!v.requestFocus(FOCUS_DOWN)) {
                                        throw new IllegalStateException("focus search returned a view "
                                                + "that wasn't able to take focus!");
                                    }
                                }
    

    看过这几行代码,我们会心生疑问:

    1. v 是否为空?如果不为空,是哪个控件?
    2. 如果 v 不为空,v.requestFocus(FOCUS_DOWN) 为什么失败?

    带着这2个问题,我们看下2个方法对应的代码。仅仅是看系统源代码,效率有点低。我们可以结合稳定复现的路径,进行单步调试,这样效率更高些。根据断点调试(关于如何对系统源代码进行断点调试,参见笔者的另一篇博客《浅尝安卓事件分发机制》),在不发生崩溃的路径上,v = null;在发生崩溃的路径上,v 是输入框下面的单选框,此时 v.requestFocus(FOCUS_DOWN)=false,正是造成崩溃的原因。

    我们先不看 focusSearch(),这牵涉到焦点搜索策略,内容较多。我们先看 View#requestFocus()。从 《TouchMode 101》 我们知道,除了 EditText,其他控件,包括单选框控件,其 isFocusableInTouchMode() 都返回 false。View#requestFocus() 内部实际调用的方法是:

        private boolean requestFocusNoSearch(int direction, Rect previouslyFocusedRect) {
            // need to be focusable
            if ((mViewFlags & FOCUSABLE) != FOCUSABLE
                    || (mViewFlags & VISIBILITY_MASK) != VISIBLE) {
                return false;
            }
    
            // need to be focusable in touch mode if in touch mode
            if (isInTouchMode() &&
                (FOCUSABLE_IN_TOUCH_MODE != (mViewFlags & FOCUSABLE_IN_TOUCH_MODE))) {
                   return false;
            }
    
            // need to not have any parents blocking us
            if (hasAncestorThatBlocksDescendantFocus()) {
                return false;
            }
    
            handleFocusGainInternal(direction, previouslyFocusedRect);
            return true;
        }
    
    

    注意其中的第2个 if 语句,由于单选框在 TouchMode 下 focusable = false,于是代码运行到这个 if 语句就直接返回 false 了,导致在 TextView#onKeyUp() 方法中抛出异常。既然如此,我们如果强行把单选框的在 TouchMode 模式下设置为 focusable 的,是不是就解决该问题了?我们来验证下。在 Demo 工程中添加1行代码,做如下修改:

            @NonNull
            @Override
            public RecyclerView.ViewHolder onCreateViewHolder(@NonNull ViewGroup viewGroup, int viewType) {
    
                View view;
    
                if (viewType == viewTypeEditText) {
                    view = buildEditText(viewGroup.getContext());
    
                } else if (viewTypeCheckbox == viewType) {
                    view = buildCheckbox(viewGroup.getContext());
                    
                    // 设置单选框在 TouchMode 模式下是 focusable 的
                    view.setFocusableInTouchMode(true);
    
                } else {
                    view = buildTextView(viewGroup.getContext());
                }
    
                return new MyHolder(view);
            }
    

    在13个文本项且不滑动单选框到屏幕中的场景下,测试效果:


    bingo

    而且看起来并没有啥副作用。

    回过头来看 View#focusSearch()

                                View v = focusSearch(FOCUS_DOWN);
    
                                if (v != null) {
                                    if (!v.requestFocus(FOCUS_DOWN)) {
                                        throw new IllegalStateException("focus search returned a view "
                                                + "that wasn't able to take focus!");
                                    }
                                }
    

    为什么单选框显示在屏幕上时 v = null 而其不显示在屏幕上时则指向单选框?focusSearch() 在 View、ViewGroup、RecyclerView 中分别有各自的实现方式。

    View#focusSearch() 中,其实是调用的 ViewGroup 或者 RecyclerView 的 focusSearch()

        public View focusSearch(@FocusRealDirection int direction) {
            if (mParent != null) {
                return mParent.focusSearch(this, direction);
            } else {
                return null;
            }
        }
    

    ViewGroup#focusSearch() 看起来也比较简单,功能是一路类递归调用知道寻找到顶层的根控件,将根控件作为参数,调用 FocusFinder.getInstance().findNextFocus(this, focused, direction)

        /**
         * Find the nearest view in the specified direction that wants to take
         * focus.
         *
         * @param focused The view that currently has focus
         * @param direction One of FOCUS_UP, FOCUS_DOWN, FOCUS_LEFT, and
         *        FOCUS_RIGHT, or 0 for not applicable.
         */
        @Override
        public View focusSearch(View focused, int direction) {
            if (isRootNamespace()) {
                // root namespace means we should consider ourselves the top of the
                // tree for focus searching; otherwise we could be focus searching
                // into other tabs.  see LocalActivityManager and TabHost for more info.
                return FocusFinder.getInstance().findNextFocus(this, focused, direction);
            } else if (mParent != null) {
                return mParent.focusSearch(focused, direction);
            }
            return null;
        }
    

    FocusFinder.getInstance().findNextFocus(this, focused, direction) 是 ViewGroup 中焦点搜索策略的核心代码,内容较多,暂且不展开讲述。

    RecyclerView#focusSearch() 更为复杂:

        /**
         * Since RecyclerView is a collection ViewGroup that includes virtual children (items that are
         * in the Adapter but not visible in the UI), it employs a more involved focus search strategy
         * that differs from other ViewGroups.
         * <p>
         * It first does a focus search within the RecyclerView. If this search finds a View that is in
         * the focus direction with respect to the currently focused View, RecyclerView returns that
         * child as the next focus target. When it cannot find such child, it calls
         * {@link LayoutManager#onFocusSearchFailed(View, int, Recycler, State)} to layout more Views
         * in the focus search direction. If LayoutManager adds a View that matches the
         * focus search criteria, it will be returned as the focus search result. Otherwise,
         * RecyclerView will call parent to handle the focus search like a regular ViewGroup.
         * <p>
         * When the direction is {@link View#FOCUS_FORWARD} or {@link View#FOCUS_BACKWARD}, a View that
         * is not in the focus direction is still valid focus target which may not be the desired
         * behavior if the Adapter has more children in the focus direction. To handle this case,
         * RecyclerView converts the focus direction to an absolute direction and makes a preliminary
         * focus search in that direction. If there are no Views to gain focus, it will call
         * {@link LayoutManager#onFocusSearchFailed(View, int, Recycler, State)} before running a
         * focus search with the original (relative) direction. This allows RecyclerView to provide
         * better candidates to the focus search while still allowing the view system to take focus from
         * the RecyclerView and give it to a more suitable child if such child exists.
         *
         * @param focused The view that currently has focus
         * @param direction One of {@link View#FOCUS_UP}, {@link View#FOCUS_DOWN},
         * {@link View#FOCUS_LEFT}, {@link View#FOCUS_RIGHT}, {@link View#FOCUS_FORWARD},
         * {@link View#FOCUS_BACKWARD} or 0 for not applicable.
         *
         * @return A new View that can be the next focus after the focused View
         */
        @Override
        public View focusSearch(View focused, int direction) {
            View result = mLayout.onInterceptFocusSearch(focused, direction);
            if (result != null) {
                return result;
            }
            final boolean canRunFocusFailure = mAdapter != null && mLayout != null
                    && !isComputingLayout() && !mLayoutFrozen;
    
            final FocusFinder ff = FocusFinder.getInstance();
            if (canRunFocusFailure
                    && (direction == View.FOCUS_FORWARD || direction == View.FOCUS_BACKWARD)) {
                // convert direction to absolute direction and see if we have a view there and if not
                // tell LayoutManager to add if it can.
                boolean needsFocusFailureLayout = false;
                if (mLayout.canScrollVertically()) {
                    final int absDir =
                            direction == View.FOCUS_FORWARD ? View.FOCUS_DOWN : View.FOCUS_UP;
                    final View found = ff.findNextFocus(this, focused, absDir);
                    needsFocusFailureLayout = found == null;
                    if (FORCE_ABS_FOCUS_SEARCH_DIRECTION) {
                        // Workaround for broken FOCUS_BACKWARD in API 15 and older devices.
                        direction = absDir;
                    }
                }
                if (!needsFocusFailureLayout && mLayout.canScrollHorizontally()) {
                    boolean rtl = mLayout.getLayoutDirection() == ViewCompat.LAYOUT_DIRECTION_RTL;
                    final int absDir = (direction == View.FOCUS_FORWARD) ^ rtl
                            ? View.FOCUS_RIGHT : View.FOCUS_LEFT;
                    final View found = ff.findNextFocus(this, focused, absDir);
                    needsFocusFailureLayout = found == null;
                    if (FORCE_ABS_FOCUS_SEARCH_DIRECTION) {
                        // Workaround for broken FOCUS_BACKWARD in API 15 and older devices.
                        direction = absDir;
                    }
                }
                if (needsFocusFailureLayout) {
                    consumePendingUpdateOperations();
                    final View focusedItemView = findContainingItemView(focused);
                    if (focusedItemView == null) {
                        // panic, focused view is not a child anymore, cannot call super.
                        return null;
                    }
                    eatRequestLayout();
                    mLayout.onFocusSearchFailed(focused, direction, mRecycler, mState);
                    resumeRequestLayout(false);
                }
                result = ff.findNextFocus(this, focused, direction);
            } else {
                result = ff.findNextFocus(this, focused, direction);
                if (result == null && canRunFocusFailure) {
                    consumePendingUpdateOperations();
                    final View focusedItemView = findContainingItemView(focused);
                    if (focusedItemView == null) {
                        // panic, focused view is not a child anymore, cannot call super.
                        return null;
                    }
                    eatRequestLayout();
                    result = mLayout.onFocusSearchFailed(focused, direction, mRecycler, mState);
                    resumeRequestLayout(false);
                }
            }
            if (result != null && !result.hasFocusable()) {
                if (getFocusedChild() == null) {
                    // Scrolling to this unfocusable view is not meaningful since there is no currently
                    // focused view which RV needs to keep visible.
                    return super.focusSearch(focused, direction);
                }
                // If the next view returned by onFocusSearchFailed in layout manager has no focusable
                // views, we still scroll to that view in order to make it visible on the screen.
                // If it's focusable, framework already calls RV's requestChildFocus which handles
                // bringing this newly focused item onto the screen.
                requestChildOnScreen(result, null);
                return focused;
            }
            return isPreferredNextFocus(focused, result, direction)
                    ? result : super.focusSearch(focused, direction);
        }
    

    在崩溃的路径中,相关代码为:

        /**
         * Since RecyclerView is a collection ViewGroup that includes virtual children (items that are
         * in the Adapter but not visible in the UI), it employs a more involved focus search strategy
         * that differs from other ViewGroups.
         * <p>
         * It first does a focus search within the RecyclerView. If this search finds a View that is in
         * the focus direction with respect to the currently focused View, RecyclerView returns that
         * child as the next focus target. When it cannot find such child, it calls
         * {@link LayoutManager#onFocusSearchFailed(View, int, Recycler, State)} to layout more Views
         * in the focus search direction. If LayoutManager adds a View that matches the
         * focus search criteria, it will be returned as the focus search result. Otherwise,
         * RecyclerView will call parent to handle the focus search like a regular ViewGroup.
         * <p>
         * When the direction is {@link View#FOCUS_FORWARD} or {@link View#FOCUS_BACKWARD}, a View that
         * is not in the focus direction is still valid focus target which may not be the desired
         * behavior if the Adapter has more children in the focus direction. To handle this case,
         * RecyclerView converts the focus direction to an absolute direction and makes a preliminary
         * focus search in that direction. If there are no Views to gain focus, it will call
         * {@link LayoutManager#onFocusSearchFailed(View, int, Recycler, State)} before running a
         * focus search with the original (relative) direction. This allows RecyclerView to provide
         * better candidates to the focus search while still allowing the view system to take focus from
         * the RecyclerView and give it to a more suitable child if such child exists.
         *
         * @param focused The view that currently has focus
         * @param direction One of {@link View#FOCUS_UP}, {@link View#FOCUS_DOWN},
         * {@link View#FOCUS_LEFT}, {@link View#FOCUS_RIGHT}, {@link View#FOCUS_FORWARD},
         * {@link View#FOCUS_BACKWARD} or 0 for not applicable.
         *
         * @return A new View that can be the next focus after the focused View
         */
        @Override
        public View focusSearch(View focused, int direction) {
            
            // omitted
    
            if (canRunFocusFailure
                    && (direction == View.FOCUS_FORWARD || direction == View.FOCUS_BACKWARD)) {
    
                // omitted
    
            } else {
                // omitted
                    
                    // 关键代码
                    result = mLayout.onFocusSearchFailed(focused, direction, mRecycler, mState);
    
                // omitted
            }
    
            // omitted
        }
    

    关键在于 result = mLayout.onFocusSearchFailed(focused, direction, mRecycler, mState); 一行,这里的 mLayout 是 LinearLayoutManager,我们看 LinearLayoutManager#onFocusSearchFailed() 的代码实现:

        @Override
        public View onFocusSearchFailed(View focused, int focusDirection,
                RecyclerView.Recycler recycler, RecyclerView.State state) {
            resolveShouldLayoutReverse();
            if (getChildCount() == 0) {
                return null;
            }
    
            final int layoutDir = convertFocusDirectionToLayoutDirection(focusDirection);
            if (layoutDir == LayoutState.INVALID_LAYOUT) {
                return null;
            }
            ensureLayoutState();
            ensureLayoutState();
            final int maxScroll = (int) (MAX_SCROLL_FACTOR * mOrientationHelper.getTotalSpace());
            updateLayoutState(layoutDir, maxScroll, false, state);
            mLayoutState.mScrollingOffset = LayoutState.SCROLLING_OFFSET_NaN;
            mLayoutState.mRecycle = false;
            fill(recycler, mLayoutState, state, true);
    
            // nextCandidate is the first child view in the layout direction that's partially
            // within RV's bounds, i.e. part of it is visible or it's completely invisible but still
            // touching RV's bounds. This will be the unfocusable candidate view to become visible onto
            // the screen if no focusable views are found in the given layout direction.
            final View nextCandidate;
            if (layoutDir == LayoutState.LAYOUT_START) {
                nextCandidate = findPartiallyOrCompletelyInvisibleChildClosestToStart(recycler, state);
            } else {
                nextCandidate = findPartiallyOrCompletelyInvisibleChildClosestToEnd(recycler, state);
            }
            // nextFocus is meaningful only if it refers to a focusable child, in which case it
            // indicates the next view to gain focus.
            final View nextFocus;
            if (layoutDir == LayoutState.LAYOUT_START) {
                nextFocus = getChildClosestToStart();
            } else {
                nextFocus = getChildClosestToEnd();
            }
            if (nextFocus.hasFocusable()) {
                if (nextCandidate == null) {
                    return null;
                }
                return nextFocus;
            }
            return nextCandidate;
        }
    

    在崩溃的路径上,我们单步调试会发现,nextCandidate 是输入框控件,而 nextFocus 是单选框控件,于是该方法就返回了单选框控件。

    解决方案

    • 为输入框控件设置空的 OnClickListener;
    • 将单选框控件设置为在 TouchMode 模式下 focusable 为 true;
    • 给单选框控件添加 android:imeOptions="actionNone"属性;

    参考文献

    相关文章

      网友评论

        本文标题:庖丁解BUG:focus search returned a v

        本文链接:https://www.haomeiwen.com/subject/zxprfctx.html