/**
* Sends a Message containing only the what value, to be delivered
* after the specified amount of time elapses.
* @see #sendMessageDelayed(android.os.Message, long)
*
* @return Returns true if the message was successfully placed in to the
* message queue. Returns false on failure, usually because the
* looper processing the message queue is exiting.
*/
public final boolean sendEmptyMessageDelayed(int what, long delayMillis) {
Message msg = Message.obtain();
msg.what = what;
return sendMessageDelayed(msg, delayMillis);
}
/**
* Enqueue a message into the message queue after all pending messages
* before (current time + delayMillis). You will receive it in
* {@link #handleMessage}, in the thread attached to this handler.
*
* @return Returns true if the message was successfully placed in to the
* message queue. Returns false on failure, usually because the
* looper processing the message queue is exiting. Note that a
* result of true does not mean the message will be processed -- if
* the looper is quit before the delivery time of the message
* occurs then the message will be dropped.
*/
public final boolean sendMessageDelayed(@NonNull Message msg, long delayMillis) {
if (delayMillis < 0) {
delayMillis = 0;
}
return sendMessageAtTime(msg, SystemClock.uptimeMillis() + delayMillis);
}
/**
* Enqueue a message into the message queue after all pending messages
* before the absolute time (in milliseconds) <var>uptimeMillis</var>.
* <b>The time-base is {@link android.os.SystemClock#uptimeMillis}.</b>
* Time spent in deep sleep will add an additional delay to execution.
* You will receive it in {@link #handleMessage}, in the thread attached
* to this handler.
*
* @param uptimeMillis The absolute time at which the message should be
* delivered, using the
* {@link android.os.SystemClock#uptimeMillis} time-base.
*
* @return Returns true if the message was successfully placed in to the
* message queue. Returns false on failure, usually because the
* looper processing the message queue is exiting. Note that a
* result of true does not mean the message will be processed -- if
* the looper is quit before the delivery time of the message
* occurs then the message will be dropped.
*/
public boolean sendMessageAtTime(@NonNull Message msg, long uptimeMillis) {
MessageQueue queue = mQueue;
if (queue == null) {
RuntimeException e = new RuntimeException(
this + " sendMessageAtTime() called with no mQueue");
Log.w("Looper", e.getMessage(), e);
return false;
}
return enqueueMessage(queue, msg, uptimeMillis);
}
发送延迟消息可以用sendEmptyMessageDelayed，sendMessageAtTime,你可以确定一个时间，这个时间有了之后，我们的每个message就会有一个时间，when，什么时候执行，当我们每次sendMessage以后，每个消息都会加上一个时间，所以呢，handler的消息她是按照时间进行排序的，当enqueueMessage时，把消息排完序后，入队，入完队列后，那它这个消息怎么执行呢？这又个next(),如果取出来一个消息，不为null时，就会把这个执行这个消息的时间与当前时间对比，如果发现这个消息还没达到它执行的时间，比如这个消息等待两分钟，现在还没达到，只等待了1分钟，这时候当前时间就比它小，还没达到要执行的时刻，于是乎，就会用这个执行的时刻与当前时间相减，得到一个时间，意味着这个时间就是它要等待的时间，那么这个等待是按，有了这个时间后，震哥哥流程就完事了，
native是怎么执行的？
nativeWake:
void NativeMessageQueue::wake() {
mLooper->wake();
}
void Looper::wake() {
uint64_t inc = 1;
ssize_t nWrite = TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY(write(mWakeEventFd, &inc, sizeof(uint64_t)));
if (nWrite != sizeof(uint64_t)) {
if (errno != EAGAIN) {
LOG_ALWAYS_FATAL("Could not write wake signal to fd %d: %s",
mWakeEventFd, strerror(errno));
}
}
}
nativePollOnce:
void NativeMessageQueue::pollOnce(JNIEnv* env, jobject pollObj, int timeoutMillis) {
mPollEnv = env;
mPollObj = pollObj;
mLooper->pollOnce(timeoutMillis);
mPollObj = NULL;
mPollEnv = NULL;
if (mExceptionObj) {
env->Throw(mExceptionObj);
env->DeleteLocalRef(mExceptionObj);
mExceptionObj = NULL;
}
}
int Looper::pollOnce(int timeoutMillis, int* outFd, int* outEvents, void** outData) {
int result = 0;
for (;;) {
while (mResponseIndex < mResponses.size()) {
const Response& response = mResponses.itemAt(mResponseIndex++);
int ident = response.request.ident;
if (ident >= 0) {
int fd = response.request.fd;
int events = response.events;
void* data = response.request.data;
if (outFd != NULL) *outFd = fd;
if (outEvents != NULL) *outEvents = events;
if (outData != NULL) *outData = data;
return ident;
}
}
if (result != 0) {
if (outFd != NULL) *outFd = 0;
if (outEvents != NULL) *outEvents = 0;
if (outData != NULL) *outData = NULL;
return result;
}
result = pollInner(timeoutMillis);
}
}
int Looper::pollInner(int timeoutMillis) {
// Adjust the timeout based on when the next message is due.
if (timeoutMillis != 0 && mNextMessageUptime != LLONG_MAX) {
nsecs_t now = systemTime(SYSTEM_TIME_MONOTONIC);
int messageTimeoutMillis = toMillisecondTimeoutDelay(now, mNextMessageUptime);
if (messageTimeoutMillis >= 0
&& (timeoutMillis < 0 || messageTimeoutMillis < timeoutMillis)) {
timeoutMillis = messageTimeoutMillis;
}
}
// Poll.
int result = POLL_WAKE;
mResponses.clear();
mResponseIndex = 0;
// We are about to idle.
mPolling = true;
struct epoll_event eventItems[EPOLL_MAX_EVENTS];
// 这里重点
int eventCount = epoll_wait(mEpollFd, eventItems, EPOLL_MAX_EVENTS, timeoutMillis);
// No longer idling.
mPolling = false;
// Acquire lock.
mLock.lock();
// Rebuild epoll set if needed.
if (mEpollRebuildRequired) {
mEpollRebuildRequired = false;
rebuildEpollLocked();
goto Done;
}
// Check for poll error.
if (eventCount < 0) {
if (errno == EINTR) {
goto Done;
}
ALOGW("Poll failed with an unexpected error: %s", strerror(errno));
result = POLL_ERROR;
goto Done;
}
// Check for poll timeout.
if (eventCount == 0) {
result = POLL_TIMEOUT;
goto Done;
}
// Handle all events.
for (int i = 0; i < eventCount; i++) {
int fd = eventItems[i].data.fd;
uint32_t epollEvents = eventItems[i].events;
if (fd == mWakeEventFd) {
if (epollEvents & EPOLLIN) {
awoken();
} else {
ALOGW("Ignoring unexpected epoll events 0x%x on wake event fd.", epollEvents);
}
} else {
ssize_t requestIndex = mRequests.indexOfKey(fd);
if (requestIndex >= 0) {
int events = 0;
if (epollEvents & EPOLLIN) events |= EVENT_INPUT;
if (epollEvents & EPOLLOUT) events |= EVENT_OUTPUT;
if (epollEvents & EPOLLERR) events |= EVENT_ERROR;
if (epollEvents & EPOLLHUP) events |= EVENT_HANGUP;
pushResponse(events, mRequests.valueAt(requestIndex));
} else {
ALOGW("Ignoring unexpected epoll events 0x%x on fd %d that is "
"no longer registered.", epollEvents, fd);
}
}
}
Done: ;
// Invoke pending message callbacks.
mNextMessageUptime = LLONG_MAX;
while (mMessageEnvelopes.size() != 0) {
nsecs_t now = systemTime(SYSTEM_TIME_MONOTONIC);
const MessageEnvelope& messageEnvelope = mMessageEnvelopes.itemAt(0);
if (messageEnvelope.uptime <= now) {
// Remove the envelope from the list.
// We keep a strong reference to the handler until the call to handleMessage
// finishes. Then we drop it so that the handler can be deleted *before*
// we reacquire our lock.
{ // obtain handler
sp<MessageHandler> handler = messageEnvelope.handler;
Message message = messageEnvelope.message;
mMessageEnvelopes.removeAt(0);
mSendingMessage = true;
mLock.unlock();
handler->handleMessage(message);
} // release handler
mLock.lock();
mSendingMessage = false;
result = POLL_CALLBACK;
} else {
// The last message left at the head of the queue determines the next wakeup time.
mNextMessageUptime = messageEnvelope.uptime;
break;
}
}
// Release lock.
mLock.unlock();
// Invoke all response callbacks.
for (size_t i = 0; i < mResponses.size(); i++) {
Response& response = mResponses.editItemAt(i);
if (response.request.ident == POLL_CALLBACK) {
int fd = response.request.fd;
int events = response.events;
void* data = response.request.data;
// Invoke the callback. Note that the file descriptor may be closed by
// the callback (and potentially even reused) before the function returns so
// we need to be a little careful when removing the file descriptor afterwards.
int callbackResult = response.request.callback->handleEvent(fd, events, data);
if (callbackResult == 0) {
removeFd(fd, response.request.seq);
}
// Clear the callback reference in the response structure promptly because we
// will not clear the response vector itself until the next poll.
response.request.callback.clear();
result = POLL_CALLBACK;
}
}
return result;
}
然后到nativePollOnce，把要等待的时间传过去，传到底层去，最终会走到epoll_wait(),native代码时基于epoll实现这个等待，为什么用epoll实现？这个地方可以用什么实现？能不能用wait+notify实现？
以前可以，在2.3之前全部都是用的wait notify，之后就没用了，之后用的都是epoll，为什么用epoll？
Android所有的一切都是message，message最好时可以管理上层，以及下层，所以正式因为2.3之后有了这个需求，它除了管理Java层的等待，还需要管理native层的等待，于是乎，就在native的Android上实现了Android独有的handler机制，所以你会发现这些native代码的名字，除了前面加上native，其他都是一样的，这样下来，就可以让它整个消息机制贯穿我们整个Android里面。
网友评论