版权声明：

以下内容来自微信公共帐号“EOS技术爱好者”，搜索“EOSTechLover”即可订阅，译者Lochaiching。转载必须保留以上声明。仅授权原文转载。

本文原文链接为https://forums.eosgo.io/discussion/745/article-ix-v0-3-0-draft-eos-io-constitution-establishes-arbitration-forums，Thomas Cox在EOS GO社区中更新了宪法草案第九条的内容，由本号“EOS技术爱好者”翻译。

---

Article IX - v0.3.0 Draft EOS.IO Constitution - Establishes Arbitration Forums

第九条： 0.3.0版本EOS.IO宪法草案——建立仲裁法庭

封面图片

• Thomas Cox*

Purpose

Establishes the third leg of governance, the Judicial. Restricts Arbitrators to operate only within the context of an Arbitration Forum. (For more on what an Arbitration Forum is, read the Discussion.)

目的

建立治理的第三个支柱——司法。并限制仲裁员只在仲裁法庭的范围内行驶权力 (更多关于仲裁法庭的内容，请阅读讨论部分)。

Text of Article

No Arbitrator shall serve except within an Arbitration Forum.

本文内容

任何仲裁员不得在仲裁法庭之外的场合行使仲裁权。

Discussion

Several points.

Arbitrators are not free-range lone actors. They operate under very tight constraints:
1. They only rule on cases brought to them by a party
2. They operate within the rules of the Arbitration Forum that certified them
3. Their work is subject to oversight by their Forum
4. They publish their Findings and Orders for public view (except some aspects of cases may be kept confidential when a party to the case might be harmed by publication)
5. Their decisions must be reflective of the Constitution, the specific Contracts in play in the case, and the emerging social norms of the community

讨论

如以下几点：

仲裁者不是自由放养的独行侠，而是在非常严格的约束下行使权力的:
1，他们只对由一方提出的案件进行裁决。

2，他们在认证了仲裁法庭之内的规则后，执行仲裁。
3，他们的工作受所属法庭的监管。
4，他们公布了调查结果和公众意见的列表 (在案件的当事人可能会因公布内容受到伤害，其中部分内容可能需要保密的情况除外)。

5，他们的仲裁裁决必须反映宪法、案件中具体引用的合同，以及新兴的社区规范。

An Arbitration Forum is a collection of:

- A specific set of Rules of Dispute Resolution (RDR) for managing arbitration cases and deciding those cases

- A particular set of people who have organized the forum and who manage cases and assign arbitrators

- A system of arbitration training and certification

- A set of individual Arbitrators who have been trained and certified

仲裁法庭是以下内容的集成物 :

• 一套用于管理仲裁案件和裁决这些案件的、特定的纠纷解决规则(RDR)。

• 一组特定的，组织此法庭、案件管理和分配仲裁员的人。

• 一个培训仲裁和认证制度的系统。

• 一组经过培训和认证的独立仲裁员。

How is a particular Arbitration Forum empowered to take a case?

- The two disputants have agreed to use that particular forum, either before or after their dispute arises (it's better to agree in advance)

- The two disputants have signed a contract that stipulates the use of that particular forum

- The two disputants are part of a community or enclave, and as members they agreed to use a particular forum

- As a special case, the EOSIO Constitution should refer to a specific forum so that, if none of the prior conditions are met, there is still a forum available by default

I'm aware that the plural of the Latin word 'forum' is 'fora' -- I chose to say 'forums' because that's become accepted English usage.

一个特定的仲裁法庭是如何被授权审理案件的?

• 在纠纷者双方争端出现之前或之后(最好事先同意)，均同意使用这个指定的法庭。

• 纠纷者双方已经签署了一份规定了该法庭使用的合同。

• 纠纷者双方是社区或飞地（enclave）的一部分，作为其中一员他们同意使用此法庭。

• 考虑到特殊情况，EOSIO宪法应该指定一个特定的论坛，以防之前的条件没有都得到满足的情况下，仍然有一个默认的论坛作为备用。

我知道“forum”这个词的复数形式是“fora”，我选择了“forums”，因为这已经是英语的习惯用法了。

References

None yet

参考链接

还没有

(all opinions are my own)

（所有的观点都代表我自己）

---

本文内容不代表本号任何立场

本文图片来源于网络

本文原文链接为https://forums.eosgo.io/discussion/745/article-ix-v0-3-0-draft-eos-io-constitution-establishes-arbitration-forums ，作者Thomas Cox，译者Lochaiching。转载请参照本文文首说明。

相关文章：

通过仲裁流程的例子看社区治理理念

包含BP选举的社区为什么需要治理这一环

一个关于区块链买选票和腐败的仲裁故事

更多内容，加入我们的知识星球吧～

WechatIMG2975.jpeg