参考:MySQL GTID详解_woailyoo0000的博客-CSDN博客_mysql 查看gtid
今天将讨论一下 关于从库show slave status 中的Retrieved_Gtid_Set 和 Executed_Gtid_Set.
Retrieved_Gtid_Set : 从库已经接收到主库的事务编号
Executed_Gtid_Set : 从库自身已经执行的事务编号
首先看看master和slave的server-uuid
Master:
[root@localhost][db1]> show variables like '%uuid%';
+---------------+--------------------------------------+
| Variable_name | Value |
+---------------+--------------------------------------+
| server_uuid | 2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb |
+---------------+--------------------------------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
Slave
[root@localhost][(none)]> show variables like '%uuid%';
+---------------+--------------------------------------+
| Variable_name | Value |
+---------------+--------------------------------------+
| server_uuid | 8ce853fc-6f8a-11e7-8940-000c29e3f5ab |
+---------------+--------------------------------------+
1 row in set (0.01 sec)
其中主库的server-id是10,从库的server-id是20.
搭建好主从以后,如果没有数据写入,那么show slave status是下面这样的:
Replicate_Ignore_Server_Ids:
Master_Server_Id: 10
Master_UUID: 2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb
Master_Info_File: mysql.slave_master_info
SQL_Delay: 0
SQL_Remaining_Delay: NULL
Slave_SQL_Running_State: Slave has read all relay log; waiting for more updates
Master_Retry_Count: 86400
Master_Bind:
Last_IO_Error_Timestamp:
Last_SQL_Error_Timestamp:
Master_SSL_Crl:
Master_SSL_Crlpath:
Retrieved_Gtid_Set:
Executed_Gtid_Set:
Auto_Position: 1
Replicate_Rewrite_DB:
Channel_Name:
Master_TLS_Version:
如果在主库创建表,并且写入2条数据,是下面这样的:
[root@localhost][db1]> create table t2 ( id int);
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.07 sec)
[root@localhost][db1]> insert into t2 select 1;
Query OK, 1 row affected (0.07 sec)
Records: 1 Duplicates: 0 Warnings: 0
[root@localhost][db1]> insert into t2 select 2;
Query OK, 1 row affected (0.02 sec)
Records: 1 Duplicates: 0 Warnings: 0
这里auto_commit=1,可以看到创建表加插入2条数据,一共执行了3个事务.
从库:show slave status\G
Replicate_Ignore_Server_Ids:
Master_Server_Id: 10
Master_UUID: 2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb
Master_Info_File: mysql.slave_master_info
SQL_Delay: 0
SQL_Remaining_Delay: NULL
Slave_SQL_Running_State: Slave has read all relay log; waiting for more updates
Master_Retry_Count: 86400
Master_Bind:
Last_IO_Error_Timestamp:
Last_SQL_Error_Timestamp:
Master_SSL_Crl:
Master_SSL_Crlpath:
Retrieved_Gtid_Set: 2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb:1-3
Executed_Gtid_Set: 2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb:1-3
Auto_Position: 1
主库:show master status
+------------------+----------+--------------+------------------+------------------------------------------+
| File | Position | Binlog_Do_DB | Binlog_Ignore_DB | Executed_Gtid_Set |
+------------------+----------+--------------+------------------+------------------------------------------+
| mysql-bin.000001 | 912 | | | **2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb**:**1-3** |
+------------------+----------+--------------+------------------+------------------------------------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
其中主库的 Executed_Gtid_Set为:2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb:1-3
看到从库的Retrieved_Gtid_Set为: 2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb:1-3
Executed_Gtid_Set为: 2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb:1-3
也就是说主库产生了3个事务,从库接收到了主库的3个事务,且都已全部执行。
其中 **2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb **是主库的server-uuid. 可以从从库解析binlog看出:
# at 154
#170823 0:38:38 **server id 10** end_log_pos 219 CRC32 0x6268641f GTID last_committed=0 **sequence_number=1**
SET @@SESSION.GTID_NEXT= '**2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb**:**1**'/*!*/;
# at 219
#170823 0:38:38 server id 10 end_log_pos 316 CRC32 0x6c837618 Query thread_id=103 exec_time=0 error_code=0
use `db1`/*!*/;
SET TIMESTAMP=1503419918/*!*/;
SET @@session.pseudo_thread_id=103/*!*/;
SET @@session.foreign_key_checks=1, @@session.sql_auto_is_null=0, @@session.unique_checks=1, @@session.autocommit=1/*!*/;
SET @@session.sql_mode=1436549152/*!*/;
SET @@session.auto_increment_increment=1, @@session.auto_increment_offset=1/*!*/;
/*!\C utf8 *//*!*/;
SET @@session.character_set_client=33,@@session.collation_connection=33,@@session.collation_server=33/*!*/;
SET @@session.lc_time_names=0/*!*/;
SET @@session.collation_database=DEFAULT/*!*/;
**create table t2 ( id int)**
/*!*/;
可以看见server-id为10,gtid-next为**2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb**:**1**,执行了建表,剩下的
**2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb**:**2 与 ****2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb**:**3** 执行的查询我没有写出来。
**这里也体现了文章开始提到的:这个事物由谁产生,产生多少事物,非常直接的标识了出来。**
那么对于文章开头那个诡异的gtid是怎么出来的呢?先说说已经执行的事务:
Executed_Gtid_Set: 2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb:1-33,**
8ce853fc-6f8a-11e7-8940-000c29e3f5ab:1**
这里的**2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb:1-33**好理解,就是已经执行主库的1-33的事务,那么**8ce853fc-6f8a-11e7-8940-000c29e3f5ab:1**呢?其实也简单,有两种情况:
- NO.1 从库有数据写入(即从库插入数据)
[root@localhost][db1]> **insert into t2 select 1;**
Query OK, 1 row affected (0.03 sec)
Records: 1 Duplicates: 0 Warnings: 0
**show slave status\G;**
Replicate_Ignore_Server_Ids:
Master_Server_Id: 10
Master_UUID: 2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb
Master_Info_File: mysql.slave_master_info
SQL_Delay: 0
SQL_Remaining_Delay: NULL
Slave_SQL_Running_State: Slave has read all relay log; waiting for more updates
Master_Retry_Count: 86400
Master_Bind:
Last_IO_Error_Timestamp:
Last_SQL_Error_Timestamp:
Master_SSL_Crl:
Master_SSL_Crlpath:
**Retrieved_Gtid_Set**: **2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb**:**1-3**
**Executed_Gtid_Set**: **2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb**:**1-3**,
**8ce853fc-6f8a-11e7-8940-000c29e3f5ab**:**1**
Auto_Position: 1
Replicate_Rewrite_DB:
可以看到已经执行的事务有来自主库的**2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb**:**1-3**,也有从库自己写入的数据:**8ce853fc-6f8a-11e7-8940-000c29e3f5ab**:**1**。我们可以解析binlog看看
**mysqlbinlog -vv mysql-bin.000001 --include-gtids='8ce853fc-6f8a-11e7-8940-000c29e3f5ab:1'**
# at 896
#170823 0:59:19 **server id 20 ** end_log_pos 961 CRC32 0x0492528a GTID last_committed=3 **sequence_number=4**
SET @@SESSION.GTID_NEXT= '**8ce853fc-6f8a-11e7-8940-000c29e3f5ab**:**1**'/*!*/;
# at 961
#170823 0:59:19 server id 20 end_log_pos 1032 CRC32 0xbf545cca Query thread_id=25 exec_time=0 error_code=0
SET TIMESTAMP=1503421159/*!*/;
SET @@session.pseudo_thread_id=25/*!*/;
SET @@session.foreign_key_checks=1, @@session.sql_auto_is_null=0, @@session.unique_checks=1, @@session.autocommit=1/*!*/;
SET @@session.sql_mode=1436549152/*!*/;
SET @@session.auto_increment_increment=1, @@session.auto_increment_offset=1/*!*/;
/*!\C utf8 *//*!*/;
SET @@session.character_set_client=33,@@session.collation_connection=33,@@session.collation_server=33/*!*/;
SET @@session.lc_time_names=0/*!*/;
SET @@session.collation_database=DEFAULT/*!*/;
BEGIN
/*!*/;
# at 1032
#170823 0:59:19 server id 20 end_log_pos 1079 CRC32 0x2f2de3ec Rows_query
# insert into t2 select 1
# at 1079
#170823 0:59:19 server id 20 end_log_pos 1123 CRC32 0x18fe1c5c Table_map: `db1`.`t2` mapped to number 109
# at 1123
#170823 0:59:19 server id 20 end_log_pos 1163 CRC32 0x163a708e Write_rows: table id 109 flags: STMT_END_F
BINLOG '
52KcWR0UAAAALwAAADcEAACAABdpbnNlcnQgaW50byB0MiBzZWxlY3QgMezjLS8=
52KcWRMUAAAALAAAAGMEAAAAAG0AAAAAAAEAA2RiMQACdDIAAQMAAVwc/hg=
52KcWR4UAAAAKAAAAIsEAAAAAG0AAAAAAAEAAgAB//4BAAAAjnA6Fg==
'/*!*/;
### **INSERT INTO `db1`.`t2`**
### **SET**
### ** @1=1 /* INT meta=0 nullable=1 is_null=0 */**
# at 1163
#170823 0:59:19 server id 20 end_log_pos 1194 CRC32 0xe3347ac1 Xid = 68
COMMIT/*!*/;
SET @@SESSION.GTID_NEXT= 'AUTOMATIC' /* added by mysqlbinlog */ /*!*/;
从binlog中可以清楚看到是从库进行了写入。
NO.2 主从切换(这里使用的是MHA切换主从)
> Master_Server_Id: 20
Master_UUID: 8ce853fc-6f8a-11e7-8940-000c29e3f5ab
Master_Info_File: mysql.slave_master_info
SQL_Delay: 0
SQL_Remaining_Delay: NULL
Slave_SQL_Running_State: Slave has read all relay log; waiting for more updates
Master_Retry_Count: 86400
Master_Bind:
Last_IO_Error_Timestamp:
Last_SQL_Error_Timestamp:
Master_SSL_Crl:
Master_SSL_Crlpath:
**Retrieved_Gtid_Set**: **8ce853fc-6f8a-11e7-8940-000c29e3f5ab**:**1**
**Executed_Gtid_Set**: **2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb**:**1-3**,
**8ce853fc-6f8a-11e7-8940-000c29e3f5ab**:**1**
Auto_Position: 1
可以看到主从切换以后主库的server-id是20。这里的意思是接收到主库**8ce853fc-6f8a-11e7-8940-000c29e3f5ab**:**1**,并已经执行了这个事物,这个事物其实就是之前从库写入的那条数据。对于**2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb**:**1-3**就是之前主库执行的3个事务,如果此时在主库再插入一条数据,那么变化如下:
** Retrieved_Gtid_Set**: **8ce853fc-6f8a-11e7-8940-000c29e3f5ab**:**1-2**
**Executed_Gtid_Set**: **2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb**:**1-3**,
**8ce853fc-6f8a-11e7-8940-000c29e3f5ab**:**1-2**
**下面说说GTID不连续问题,类似 ****2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb**:**37-45 ****,这个是由于binlog被清理后导致的,我们可以测试一下,然后查看gtid_purge变量。**
binlog不可能永远驻留在服务上,需要定期进行清理(通过**expire_logs_days**可以控制定期清理间隔),否则迟早它会把磁盘用尽。**gtid_purged**用于记录已经被清除了的binlog事务集合,它是**gtid_executed**的子集。只有**gtid_executed**为空时才能手动设置该变量,此时会同时更新**gtid_executed**为和**gtid_purged**相同的值。**gtid_executed**为空意味着要么之前没有启动过基于GTID的复制,要么执行过**RESET MASTER**。执行**RESET MASTER**时同样也会把**gtid_purged**置空,即始终保持**gtid_purged**是**gtid_executed**的子集。
>[root@localhost][db1]> **show master logs;**
+------------------+-----------+
| Log_name | File_size |
+------------------+-----------+
| mysql-bin.000001 | 3530 |
+------------------+-----------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
[root@localhost][db1]> **flush logs;**
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.05 sec)
[root@localhost][db1]> **show master logs;**
+------------------+-----------+
| Log_name | File_size |
+------------------+-----------+
| mysql-bin.000001 | 3577 |
| mysql-bin.000002 | 234 |
+------------------+-----------+
2 rows in set (0.00 sec)
[root@localhost][db1]> **PURGE BINARY LOGS TO 'mysql-bin.000002';**
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.01 sec)
[root@localhost][db1]> **show master logs;**
+------------------+-----------+
| Log_name | File_size |
+------------------+-----------+
| mysql-bin.000002 | 234 |
+------------------+-----------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
然后只要从库有重新启动,才会读取。MySQL服务器启动时,通过读binlog文件,初始化gtid_executed和gtid_purged,使它们的值能和上次MySQL运行时一致。
**gtid_executed 本机被执行并写入日志的gtid**
**gtid_purged 该变量中记录的是本机上已经执行过,但是已经被purge binary logs to命令清理的gtid_set**
**没启动前:**
**Retrieved_Gtid_Set**: **8ce853fc-6f8a-11e7-8940-000c29e3f5ab**:**1-9**
**Executed_Gtid_Set**: **2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb**:**1-3**,
**8ce853fc-6f8a-11e7-8940-000c29e3f5ab**:**1-9**
重启并插入数据:
> Master_Server_Id: 20
Master_UUID: 8ce853fc-6f8a-11e7-8940-000c29e3f5ab
Master_Info_File: mysql.slave_master_info
SQL_Delay: 0
SQL_Remaining_Delay: NULL
Slave_SQL_Running_State: Slave has read all relay log; waiting for more updates
Master_Retry_Count: 86400
Master_Bind:
Last_IO_Error_Timestamp:
Last_SQL_Error_Timestamp:
Master_SSL_Crl:
Master_SSL_Crlpath:
**Retrieved_Gtid_Set**: **8ce853fc-6f8a-11e7-8940-000c29e3f5ab**:**10**
**Executed_Gtid_Set**: **2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb**:**1-3**,
**8ce853fc-6f8a-11e7-8940-000c29e3f5ab**:**1-10**
Auto_Position: 1
show variables like 'gtid_purged';**
+---------------+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Variable_name | Value |
+---------------+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| gtid_purged | **2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb**:**1-3**,
**8ce853fc-6f8a-11e7-8940-000c29e3f5ab**:**1-9** |
+---------------+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
1 row in set (0.01 sec)
可以看到 **2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb**:**1-3 与 ****8ce853fc-6f8a-11e7-8940-000c29e3f5ab**:**1-9 **都在mysql-bin.000001里,已经被清除了。
下面的两个实验,将会告诉我们如果主日志被清除,但从还没获得这些日志,该怎么处理:**
实验一:如果slave所需要事务对应的GTID在master上已经被purge了
根据`show global variables like '%gtid%'`的命令结果我们可以看到,和GTID相关的变量中有一个`gtid_purged`。从字面意思以及 [官方文档](http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.6/en/replication-options-gtids.html#sysvar_gtid_purged)可以知道该变量中记录的是本机上已经执行过,但是已经被`purge binary logs to`命令清理的`gtid_set`。
本节中我们就要试验下,如果master上把某些slave还没有fetch到的gtid event purge后会有什么样的结果。
以下指令在master上执行
master [localhost] {msandbox} (test) > show global variables like '%gtid%';+---------------------------------+----------------------------------------+| Variable_name | Value |+---------------------------------+----------------------------------------+| binlog_gtid_simple_recovery | OFF || enforce_gtid_consistency | ON || gtid_executed | 24024e52-bd95-11e4-9c6d-926853670d0b:1 || gtid_mode | ON || gtid_owned | || gtid_purged | || simplified_binlog_gtid_recovery | OFF |+---------------------------------+----------------------------------------+7 rows in set (0.01 sec) master [localhost] {msandbox} (test) > flush logs;create table gtid_test2 (ID int) engine=innodb;Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.04 sec) Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.02 sec) master [localhost] {msandbox} (test) > flush logs;create table gtid_test3 (ID int) engine=innodb;Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.04 sec) Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.04 sec) master [localhost] {msandbox} (test) > show master status;+------------------+----------+--------------+------------------+------------------------------------------+| File | Position | Binlog_Do_DB | Binlog_Ignore_DB | Executed_Gtid_Set |+------------------+----------+--------------+------------------+------------------------------------------+| mysql-bin.000005 | 359 | | | 24024e52-bd95-11e4-9c6d-926853670d0b:1-3 |+------------------+----------+--------------+------------------+------------------------------------------+1 row in set (0.00 sec) master [localhost] {msandbox} (test) > purge binary logs to 'mysql-bin.000004';Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.03 sec) master [localhost] {msandbox} (test) > show global variables like '%gtid%';+---------------------------------+------------------------------------------+| Variable_name | Value |+---------------------------------+------------------------------------------+| binlog_gtid_simple_recovery | OFF || enforce_gtid_consistency | ON || gtid_executed | 24024e52-bd95-11e4-9c6d-926853670d0b:1-3 || gtid_mode | ON || gtid_owned | || gtid_purged | 24024e52-bd95-11e4-9c6d-926853670d0b:1 || simplified_binlog_gtid_recovery | OFF |+---------------------------------+------------------------------------------+7 rows in set (0.00 sec)
在slave2上重新做一次主从,以下命令在slave2上执行
slave2 [localhost] {msandbox} ((none)) > change master to master_host='127.0.0.1',master_port =21288,master_user='rsandbox',master_password='rsandbox',master_auto_position=1;Query OK, 0 rows affected, 2 warnings (0.04 sec) slave2 [localhost] {msandbox} ((none)) > start slave;Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.01 sec)slave2 [localhost] {msandbox} ((none)) > show slave status\G*************************** 1. row *************************** ...... Slave_IO_Running: No Slave_SQL_Running: Yes ...... Last_Errno: 0 Last_Error: Skip_Counter: 0 Exec_Master_Log_Pos: 0 Relay_Log_Space: 151 ...... Last_IO_Errno: 1236 Last_IO_Error: Got fatal error 1236 from master when reading data from binary log: 'The slave is connecting using CHANGE MASTER TO MASTER_AUTO_POSITION = 1, but the master has purged binary logs containing GTIDs that the slave requires.' Last_SQL_Errno: 0 Last_SQL_Error: ...... Auto_Position: 11 row in set (0.00 sec)
实验二:忽略purged的部分,强行同步
那么实际生产应用当中,偶尔会遇到这样的情况:某个slave从备份恢复后(或者load data infile)后,DBA可以人为保证该slave数据和master一致;或者即使不一致,这些差异也不会导致今后的主从异常(例如:所有master上只有insert没有update)。这样的前提下,我们又想使slave通过replication从master进行数据复制。此时我们就需要跳过master已经被purge的部分,那么实际该如何操作呢?
我们还是以实验一的情况为例:
先确认master上已经purge的部分。从下面的命令结果可以知道master上已经缺失24024e52-bd95-11e4-9c6d-926853670d0b:1
这一条事务的相关日志
master [localhost] {msandbox} (test) > show global variables like '%gtid%';+---------------------------------+------------------------------------------+| Variable_name | Value |+---------------------------------+------------------------------------------+| binlog_gtid_simple_recovery | OFF || enforce_gtid_consistency | ON || gtid_executed | 24024e52-bd95-11e4-9c6d-926853670d0b:1-3 || gtid_mode | ON || gtid_owned | || gtid_purged | 24024e52-bd95-11e4-9c6d-926853670d0b:1 || simplified_binlog_gtid_recovery | OFF |+---------------------------------+------------------------------------------+7 rows in set (0.00 sec)
在slave上通过set global gtid_purged='xxxx'
的方式,跳过已经purge的部分
slave2 [localhost] {msandbox} ((none)) > stop slave;Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.04 sec) slave2 [localhost] {msandbox} ((none)) > set global gtid_purged = '24024e52-bd95-11e4-9c6d-926853670d0b:1';Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.05 sec) slave2 [localhost] {msandbox} ((none)) > start slave;Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.01 sec) slave2 [localhost] {msandbox} ((none)) > show slave status\G *************************** 1. row *************************** Slave_IO_State: Waiting for master to send event ...... Master_Log_File: mysql-bin.000005 Read_Master_Log_Pos: 359 Relay_Log_File: mysql_sandbox21290-relay-bin.000004 Relay_Log_Pos: 569 Relay_Master_Log_File: mysql-bin.000005 Slave_IO_Running: Yes Slave_SQL_Running: Yes ...... Exec_Master_Log_Pos: 359 Relay_Log_Space: 873 ...... Master_Server_Id: 1 Master_UUID: 24024e52-bd95-11e4-9c6d-926853670d0b Master_Info_File: /data/mysql/rsandbox_mysql-5_6_23/node2/data/master.info SQL_Delay: 0 SQL_Remaining_Delay: NULL Slave_SQL_Running_State: Slave has read all relay log; waiting for the slave I/O thread to update it ...... Retrieved_Gtid_Set: 24024e52-bd95-11e4-9c6d-926853670d0b:2-3 Executed_Gtid_Set: 24024e52-bd95-11e4-9c6d-926853670d0b:1-3 Auto_Position: 11 row in set (0.00 sec)
可以看到此时slave已经可以正常同步,并补齐了24024e52-bd95-11e4-9c6d-926853670d0b:2-3范围的binlog日志。
网友评论