美文网首页
数据挖掘组队学习之模型融合

数据挖掘组队学习之模型融合

作者: 612twilight | 来源:发表于2020-03-23 21:42 被阅读0次

    同DataWhale一起组队学习：https://tianchi.aliyun.com/notebook-ai/detail?spm=5176.12281978.0.0.6802593a2HCrSE&postId=95535

    模型融合是比赛后期一个重要的环节，大体来说有如下的类型方式。

    1. 简单加权融合:
      • 回归（分类概率）：算术平均融合（Arithmetic mean），几何平均融合（Geometric mean）；
      • 分类：投票（Voting)
      • 综合：排序融合(Rank averaging)，log融合
    1. stacking/blending:
      • 构建多层模型，并利用预测结果再拟合预测。
    1. boosting/bagging（在xgboost，Adaboost,GBDT中已经用到）:
      • 多树的提升方法

    Stacking相关理论介绍

    1) 什么是 stacking

    简单来说 stacking 就是当用初始训练数据学习出若干个基学习器后，将这几个学习器的预测结果作为新的训练集，来学习一个新的学习器。

    1584448793231_6TygjXwjNb.jpg

    将个体学习器结合在一起的时候使用的方法叫做结合策略。对于分类问题，我们可以使用投票法来选择输出最多的类。对于回归问题，我们可以将分类器输出的结果求平均值。

    上面说的投票法和平均法都是很有效的结合策略，还有一种结合策略是使用另外一个机器学习算法来将个体机器学习器的结果结合在一起，这个方法就是Stacking。

    在stacking方法中，我们把个体学习器叫做初级学习器，用于结合的学习器叫做次级学习器或元学习器（meta-learner），次级学习器用于训练的数据叫做次级训练集。次级训练集是在训练集上用初级学习器得到的。

    2) 如何进行 stacking

    算法示意图如下：

    1584448806789_1ElRtHaacw.jpg

    引用自 西瓜书《机器学习》

    • 过程1-3 是训练出来个体学习器，也就是初级学习器。
    • 过程5-9是 使用训练出来的个体学习器来得预测的结果，这个预测的结果当做次级学习器的训练集。
    • 过程11 是用初级学习器预测的结果训练出次级学习器，得到我们最后训练的模型。

    3）Stacking的方法讲解

    首先，我们先从一种“不那么正确”但是容易懂的Stacking方法讲起。

    Stacking模型本质上是一种分层的结构，这里简单起见，只分析二级Stacking.假设我们有2个基模型 Model1_1、Model1_2 和 一个次级模型Model2

    Step 1. 基模型 Model1_1，对训练集train训练，然后用于预测 train 和 test 的标签列，分别是P1，T1

    Model1_1 模型训练:

    \left(\begin{array}{c}{\vdots} \\ {X_{train}} \\ {\vdots}\end{array}\right) \overbrace{\Longrightarrow}^{\text {Model1_1 Train} }\left(\begin{array}{c}{\vdots} \\ {Y}_{True} \\ {\vdots}\end{array}\right)

    训练后的模型 Model1_1 分别在 train 和 test 上预测，得到预测标签分别是P1，T1

    \left(\begin{array}{c}{\vdots} \\ {X_{train}} \\ {\vdots}\end{array}\right) \overbrace{\Longrightarrow}^{\text {Model1_1 Predict} }\left(\begin{array}{c}{\vdots} \\ {P}_{1} \\ {\vdots}\end{array}\right)

    \left(\begin{array}{c}{\vdots} \\ {X_{test}} \\ {\vdots}\end{array}\right) \overbrace{\Longrightarrow}^{\text {Model1_1 Predict} }\left(\begin{array}{c}{\vdots} \\ {T_{1}} \\ {\vdots}\end{array}\right)

    Step 2. 基模型 Model1_2 ，对训练集train训练，然后用于预测train和test的标签列，分别是P2，T2

    Model1_2 模型训练:

    \left(\begin{array}{c}{\vdots} \\ {X_{train}} \\ {\vdots}\end{array}\right) \overbrace{\Longrightarrow}^{\text {Model1_2 Train} }\left(\begin{array}{c}{\vdots} \\ {Y}_{True} \\ {\vdots}\end{array}\right)

    训练后的模型 Model1_2 分别在 train 和 test 上预测，得到预测标签分别是P2，T2

    \left(\begin{array}{c}{\vdots} \\ {X_{train}} \\ {\vdots}\end{array}\right) \overbrace{\Longrightarrow}^{\text {Model1_2 Predict} }\left(\begin{array}{c}{\vdots} \\ {P}_{2} \\ {\vdots}\end{array}\right)

    \left(\begin{array}{c}{\vdots} \\ {X_{test}} \\ {\vdots}\end{array}\right) \overbrace{\Longrightarrow}^{\text {Model1_2 Predict} }\left(\begin{array}{c}{\vdots} \\ {T_{2}} \\ {\vdots}\end{array}\right)

    Step 3. 分别把P1,P2以及T1,T2合并，得到一个新的训练集和测试集train2,test2.

    \overbrace{\left(\begin{array}{c}{\vdots} \\ {P_{1}} \\ {\vdots}\end{array} \begin{array}{c}{\vdots} \\ {P_{2}} \\ {\vdots}\end{array} \right)}^{\text {Train_2 }} and \overbrace{\left(\begin{array}{c}{\vdots} \\ {T_{1}} \\ {\vdots}\end{array} \begin{array}{c}{\vdots} \\ {T_{2}} \\ {\vdots}\end{array} \right)}^{\text {Test_2 }}

    再用 次级模型 Model2 以真实训练集标签为标签训练,以train2为特征进行训练，预测test2,得到最终的测试集预测的标签列 Y_{Pre}。

    \overbrace{\left(\begin{array}{c}{\vdots} \\ {P_{1}} \\ {\vdots}\end{array} \begin{array}{c}{\vdots} \\ {P_{2}} \\ {\vdots}\end{array} \right)}^{\text {Train_2 }} \overbrace{\Longrightarrow}^{\text {Model2 Train} }\left(\begin{array}{c}{\vdots} \\ {Y}_{True} \\ {\vdots}\end{array}\right)

    \overbrace{\left(\begin{array}{c}{\vdots} \\ {T_{1}} \\ {\vdots}\end{array} \begin{array}{c}{\vdots} \\ {T_{2}} \\ {\vdots}\end{array} \right)}^{\text {Test_2 }} \overbrace{\Longrightarrow}^{\text {Model1_2 Predict} }\left(\begin{array}{c}{\vdots} \\ {Y}_{Pre} \\ {\vdots}\end{array}\right)

    这就是我们两层堆叠的一种基本的原始思路想法。在不同模型预测的结果基础上再加一层模型，进行再训练，从而得到模型最终的预测。

    Stacking本质上就是这么直接的思路，但是直接这样有时对于如果训练集和测试集分布不那么一致的情况下是有一点问题的，其问题在于用初始模型训练的标签再利用真实标签进行再训练，毫无疑问会导致一定的模型过拟合训练集，这样或许模型在测试集上的泛化能力或者说效果会有一定的下降，因此现在的问题变成了如何降低再训练的过拟合性，这里我们一般有两种方法。

      1. 次级模型尽量选择简单的线性模型
      1. 利用K折交叉验证

    K-折交叉验证：
    训练：

    1584448819632_YvJOXMk02P.jpg

    预测：

    1584448826203_k8KPy9n7D9.jpg

    5.4 代码示例

    5.4.1 回归\分类概率-融合：

    1）简单加权平均，结果直接融合

    ## 生成一些简单的样本数据，test_prei 代表第i个模型的预测值
test_pre1 = [1.2, 3.2, 2.1, 6.2]
test_pre2 = [0.9, 3.1, 2.0, 5.9]
test_pre3 = [1.1, 2.9, 2.2, 6.0]

# y_test_true 代表第模型的真实值
y_test_true = [1, 3, 2, 6] 

    import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
import warnings
warnings.filterwarnings('ignore')

## 定义结果的加权平均函数
def Weighted_method(test_pre1,test_pre2,test_pre3,w=[1/3,1/3,1/3]):
    Weighted_result = w[0]*pd.Series(test_pre1)+w[1]*pd.Series(test_pre2)+w[2]*pd.Series(test_pre3)
    return Weighted_result

    from sklearn import metrics
# 各模型的预测结果计算MAE
print('Pred1 MAE:',metrics.mean_absolute_error(y_test_true, test_pre1))
print('Pred2 MAE:',metrics.mean_absolute_error(y_test_true, test_pre2))
print('Pred3 MAE:',metrics.mean_absolute_error(y_test_true, test_pre3))

    Pred1 MAE: 0.1750000000000001
Pred2 MAE: 0.07499999999999993
Pred3 MAE: 0.10000000000000009

    ## 根据加权计算MAE
w = [0.3,0.4,0.3] # 定义比重权值
Weighted_pre = Weighted_method(test_pre1,test_pre2,test_pre3,w)
print('Weighted_pre MAE:',metrics.mean_absolute_error(y_test_true, Weighted_pre))

    Weighted_pre MAE: 0.05750000000000027

    可以发现加权结果相对于之前的结果是有提升的，这种我们称其为简单的加权平均。

    还有一些特殊的形式，比如mean平均，median平均

    ## 定义结果的加权平均函数
def Mean_method(test_pre1,test_pre2,test_pre3):
    Mean_result = pd.concat([pd.Series(test_pre1),pd.Series(test_pre2),pd.Series(test_pre3)],axis=1).mean(axis=1)
    return Mean_result

    Mean_pre = Mean_method(test_pre1,test_pre2,test_pre3)
print('Mean_pre MAE:',metrics.mean_absolute_error(y_test_true, Mean_pre))

    Mean_pre MAE: 0.06666666666666693

    ## 定义结果的加权平均函数
def Median_method(test_pre1,test_pre2,test_pre3):
    Median_result = pd.concat([pd.Series(test_pre1),pd.Series(test_pre2),pd.Series(test_pre3)],axis=1).median(axis=1)
    return Median_result

    Median_pre = Median_method(test_pre1,test_pre2,test_pre3)
print('Median_pre MAE:',metrics.mean_absolute_error(y_test_true, Median_pre))

    Median_pre MAE: 0.07500000000000007

    2） Stacking融合(回归)：

    from sklearn import linear_model

def Stacking_method(train_reg1,train_reg2,train_reg3,y_train_true,test_pre1,test_pre2,test_pre3,model_L2= linear_model.LinearRegression()):
    model_L2.fit(pd.concat([pd.Series(train_reg1),pd.Series(train_reg2),pd.Series(train_reg3)],axis=1).values,y_train_true)
    Stacking_result = model_L2.predict(pd.concat([pd.Series(test_pre1),pd.Series(test_pre2),pd.Series(test_pre3)],axis=1).values)
    return Stacking_result

    ## 生成一些简单的样本数据，test_prei 代表第i个模型的预测值
train_reg1 = [3.2, 8.2, 9.1, 5.2]
train_reg2 = [2.9, 8.1, 9.0, 4.9]
train_reg3 = [3.1, 7.9, 9.2, 5.0]
# y_test_true 代表第模型的真实值
y_train_true = [3, 8, 9, 5] 

test_pre1 = [1.2, 3.2, 2.1, 6.2]
test_pre2 = [0.9, 3.1, 2.0, 5.9]
test_pre3 = [1.1, 2.9, 2.2, 6.0]

# y_test_true 代表第模型的真实值
y_test_true = [1, 3, 2, 6] 

    model_L2= linear_model.LinearRegression()
Stacking_pre = Stacking_method(train_reg1,train_reg2,train_reg3,y_train_true,
                               test_pre1,test_pre2,test_pre3,model_L2)
print('Stacking_pre MAE:',metrics.mean_absolute_error(y_test_true, Stacking_pre))

    Stacking_pre MAE: 0.04213483146067476

    可以发现模型结果相对于之前有进一步的提升，这是我们需要注意的一点是，对于第二层Stacking的模型不宜选取的过于复杂，这样会导致模型在训练集上过拟合，从而使得在测试集上并不能达到很好的效果。

    5.4.2 分类模型融合：

    对于分类，同样的可以使用融合方法，比如简单投票，Stacking...

    from sklearn.datasets import make_blobs
from sklearn import datasets
from sklearn.tree import DecisionTreeClassifier
import numpy as np
from sklearn.ensemble import RandomForestClassifier
from sklearn.ensemble import VotingClassifier
from xgboost import XGBClassifier
from sklearn.linear_model import LogisticRegression
from sklearn.svm import SVC
from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split
from sklearn.datasets import make_moons
from sklearn.metrics import accuracy_score,roc_auc_score
from sklearn.model_selection import cross_val_score
from sklearn.model_selection import StratifiedKFold

    1）Voting投票机制：

    Voting即投票机制，分为软投票和硬投票两种，其原理采用少数服从多数的思想。

    '''
硬投票：对多个模型直接进行投票，不区分模型结果的相对重要度，最终投票数最多的类为最终被预测的类。
'''
iris = datasets.load_iris()

x=iris.data
y=iris.target
x_train,x_test,y_train,y_test=train_test_split(x,y,test_size=0.3)

clf1 = XGBClassifier(learning_rate=0.1, n_estimators=150, max_depth=3, min_child_weight=2, subsample=0.7,
                     colsample_bytree=0.6, objective='binary:logistic')
clf2 = RandomForestClassifier(n_estimators=50, max_depth=1, min_samples_split=4,
                              min_samples_leaf=63,oob_score=True)
clf3 = SVC(C=0.1)

# 硬投票
eclf = VotingClassifier(estimators=[('xgb', clf1), ('rf', clf2), ('svc', clf3)], voting='hard')
for clf, label in zip([clf1, clf2, clf3, eclf], ['XGBBoosting', 'Random Forest', 'SVM', 'Ensemble']):
    scores = cross_val_score(clf, x, y, cv=5, scoring='accuracy')
    print("Accuracy: %0.2f (+/- %0.2f) [%s]" % (scores.mean(), scores.std(), label))

    Accuracy: 0.96 (+/- 0.02) [XGBBoosting]
Accuracy: 0.33 (+/- 0.00) [Random Forest]
Accuracy: 0.95 (+/- 0.03) [SVM]
Accuracy: 0.95 (+/- 0.03) [Ensemble]

    '''
软投票：和硬投票原理相同，增加了设置权重的功能，可以为不同模型设置不同权重，进而区别模型不同的重要度。
'''
x=iris.data
y=iris.target
x_train,x_test,y_train,y_test=train_test_split(x,y,test_size=0.3)

clf1 = XGBClassifier(learning_rate=0.1, n_estimators=150, max_depth=3, min_child_weight=2, subsample=0.8,
                     colsample_bytree=0.8, objective='binary:logistic')
clf2 = RandomForestClassifier(n_estimators=50, max_depth=1, min_samples_split=4,
                              min_samples_leaf=63,oob_score=True)
clf3 = SVC(C=0.1, probability=True)

# 软投票
eclf = VotingClassifier(estimators=[('xgb', clf1), ('rf', clf2), ('svc', clf3)], voting='soft', weights=[2, 1, 1])
clf1.fit(x_train, y_train)

for clf, label in zip([clf1, clf2, clf3, eclf], ['XGBBoosting', 'Random Forest', 'SVM', 'Ensemble']):
    scores = cross_val_score(clf, x, y, cv=5, scoring='accuracy')
    print("Accuracy: %0.2f (+/- %0.2f) [%s]" % (scores.mean(), scores.std(), label))

    Accuracy: 0.96 (+/- 0.02) [XGBBoosting]
Accuracy: 0.33 (+/- 0.00) [Random Forest]
Accuracy: 0.95 (+/- 0.03) [SVM]
Accuracy: 0.96 (+/- 0.02) [Ensemble]

    2）分类的Stacking\Blending融合：

    stacking是一种分层模型集成框架。

    以两层为例，第一层由多个基学习器组成，其输入为原始训练集，第二层的模型则是以第一层基学习器的输出作为训练集进行再训练，从而得到完整的stacking模型, stacking两层模型都使用了全部的训练数据。

    '''
5-Fold Stacking
'''
from sklearn.ensemble import RandomForestClassifier
from sklearn.ensemble import ExtraTreesClassifier,GradientBoostingClassifier
import pandas as pd
#创建训练的数据集
data_0 = iris.data
data = data_0[:100,:]

target_0 = iris.target
target = target_0[:100]

#模型融合中使用到的各个单模型
clfs = [LogisticRegression(solver='lbfgs'),
        RandomForestClassifier(n_estimators=5, n_jobs=-1, criterion='gini'),
        ExtraTreesClassifier(n_estimators=5, n_jobs=-1, criterion='gini'),
        ExtraTreesClassifier(n_estimators=5, n_jobs=-1, criterion='entropy'),
        GradientBoostingClassifier(learning_rate=0.05, subsample=0.5, max_depth=6, n_estimators=5)]
 
#切分一部分数据作为测试集
X, X_predict, y, y_predict = train_test_split(data, target, test_size=0.3, random_state=2020)

dataset_blend_train = np.zeros((X.shape[0], len(clfs)))
dataset_blend_test = np.zeros((X_predict.shape[0], len(clfs)))

#5折stacking
n_splits = 5
skf = StratifiedKFold(n_splits)
skf = skf.split(X, y)

for j, clf in enumerate(clfs):
    #依次训练各个单模型
    dataset_blend_test_j = np.zeros((X_predict.shape[0], 5))
    for i, (train, test) in enumerate(skf):
        #5-Fold交叉训练，使用第i个部分作为预测，剩余的部分来训练模型，获得其预测的输出作为第i部分的新特征。
        X_train, y_train, X_test, y_test = X[train], y[train], X[test], y[test]
        clf.fit(X_train, y_train)
        y_submission = clf.predict_proba(X_test)[:, 1]
        dataset_blend_train[test, j] = y_submission
        dataset_blend_test_j[:, i] = clf.predict_proba(X_predict)[:, 1]
    #对于测试集，直接用这k个模型的预测值均值作为新的特征。
    dataset_blend_test[:, j] = dataset_blend_test_j.mean(1)
    print("val auc Score: %f" % roc_auc_score(y_predict, dataset_blend_test[:, j]))

clf = LogisticRegression(solver='lbfgs')
clf.fit(dataset_blend_train, y)
y_submission = clf.predict_proba(dataset_blend_test)[:, 1]

print("Val auc Score of Stacking: %f" % (roc_auc_score(y_predict, y_submission)))


    val auc Score: 1.000000
val auc Score: 0.500000
val auc Score: 0.500000
val auc Score: 0.500000
val auc Score: 0.500000
Val auc Score of Stacking: 1.000000

    Blending，其实和Stacking是一种类似的多层模型融合的形式

    其主要思路是把原始的训练集先分成两部分，比如70%的数据作为新的训练集，剩下30%的数据作为测试集。

    在第一层，我们在这70%的数据上训练多个模型，然后去预测那30%数据的label，同时也预测test集的label。

    在第二层，我们就直接用这30%数据在第一层预测的结果做为新特征继续训练，然后用test集第一层预测的label做特征，用第二层训练的模型做进一步预测

    其优点在于：

    • 1.比stacking简单（因为不用进行k次的交叉验证来获得stacker feature）
    • 2.避开了一个信息泄露问题：generlizers和stacker使用了不一样的数据集

    缺点在于：

    • 1.使用了很少的数据（第二阶段的blender只使用training set10%的量）
    • 2.blender可能会过拟合
    • 3.stacking使用多次的交叉验证会比较稳健
      '''
    '''
Blending
'''
 
#创建训练的数据集
#创建训练的数据集
data_0 = iris.data
data = data_0[:100,:]

target_0 = iris.target
target = target_0[:100]
 
#模型融合中使用到的各个单模型
clfs = [LogisticRegression(solver='lbfgs'),
        RandomForestClassifier(n_estimators=5, n_jobs=-1, criterion='gini'),
        RandomForestClassifier(n_estimators=5, n_jobs=-1, criterion='entropy'),
        ExtraTreesClassifier(n_estimators=5, n_jobs=-1, criterion='gini'),
        #ExtraTreesClassifier(n_estimators=5, n_jobs=-1, criterion='entropy'),
        GradientBoostingClassifier(learning_rate=0.05, subsample=0.5, max_depth=6, n_estimators=5)]
 
#切分一部分数据作为测试集
X, X_predict, y, y_predict = train_test_split(data, target, test_size=0.3, random_state=2020)

#切分训练数据集为d1,d2两部分
X_d1, X_d2, y_d1, y_d2 = train_test_split(X, y, test_size=0.5, random_state=2020)
dataset_d1 = np.zeros((X_d2.shape[0], len(clfs)))
dataset_d2 = np.zeros((X_predict.shape[0], len(clfs)))
 
for j, clf in enumerate(clfs):
    #依次训练各个单模型
    clf.fit(X_d1, y_d1)
    y_submission = clf.predict_proba(X_d2)[:, 1]
    dataset_d1[:, j] = y_submission
    #对于测试集，直接用这k个模型的预测值作为新的特征。
    dataset_d2[:, j] = clf.predict_proba(X_predict)[:, 1]
    print("val auc Score: %f" % roc_auc_score(y_predict, dataset_d2[:, j]))

#融合使用的模型
clf = GradientBoostingClassifier(learning_rate=0.02, subsample=0.5, max_depth=6, n_estimators=30)
clf.fit(dataset_d1, y_d2)
y_submission = clf.predict_proba(dataset_d2)[:, 1]
print("Val auc Score of Blending: %f" % (roc_auc_score(y_predict, y_submission)))

    val auc Score: 1.000000
val auc Score: 1.000000
val auc Score: 1.000000
val auc Score: 1.000000
val auc Score: 1.000000
Val auc Score of Blending: 1.000000

    参考博客：https://blog.csdn.net/Noob_daniel/article/details/76087829

    3）分类的Stacking融合(利用mlxtend)：

    !pip install mlxtend

import warnings
warnings.filterwarnings('ignore')
import itertools
import numpy as np
import seaborn as sns
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import matplotlib.gridspec as gridspec

from sklearn import datasets
from sklearn.linear_model import LogisticRegression
from sklearn.neighbors import KNeighborsClassifier
from sklearn.naive_bayes import GaussianNB 
from sklearn.ensemble import RandomForestClassifier
from mlxtend.classifier import StackingClassifier

from sklearn.model_selection import cross_val_score
from mlxtend.plotting import plot_learning_curves
from mlxtend.plotting import plot_decision_regions

# 以python自带的鸢尾花数据集为例
iris = datasets.load_iris()
X, y = iris.data[:, 1:3], iris.target

clf1 = KNeighborsClassifier(n_neighbors=1)
clf2 = RandomForestClassifier(random_state=1)
clf3 = GaussianNB()
lr = LogisticRegression()
sclf = StackingClassifier(classifiers=[clf1, clf2, clf3], 
                          meta_classifier=lr)

label = ['KNN', 'Random Forest', 'Naive Bayes', 'Stacking Classifier']
clf_list = [clf1, clf2, clf3, sclf]

fig = plt.figure(figsize=(10,8))
gs = gridspec.GridSpec(2, 2)
grid = itertools.product([0,1],repeat=2)

clf_cv_mean = []
clf_cv_std = []
for clf, label, grd in zip(clf_list, label, grid):
        
    scores = cross_val_score(clf, X, y, cv=3, scoring='accuracy')
    print("Accuracy: %.2f (+/- %.2f) [%s]" %(scores.mean(), scores.std(), label))
    clf_cv_mean.append(scores.mean())
    clf_cv_std.append(scores.std())
        
    clf.fit(X, y)
    ax = plt.subplot(gs[grd[0], grd[1]])
    fig = plot_decision_regions(X=X, y=y, clf=clf)
    plt.title(label)

plt.show()

    Looking in indexes: https://pypi.tuna.tsinghua.edu.cn/simple
Requirement already satisfied: mlxtend in d:\programdata\anaconda3\lib\site-packages (0.17.2)
Requirement already satisfied: scipy>=1.2.1 in d:\programdata\anaconda3\lib\site-packages (from mlxtend) (1.4.1)
Requirement already satisfied: numpy>=1.16.2 in d:\programdata\anaconda3\lib\site-packages (from mlxtend) (1.16.5)
Requirement already satisfied: matplotlib>=3.0.0 in d:\programdata\anaconda3\lib\site-packages (from mlxtend) (3.1.1)
Requirement already satisfied: joblib>=0.13.2 in d:\programdata\anaconda3\lib\site-packages (from mlxtend) (0.14.1)
Requirement already satisfied: pandas>=0.24.2 in d:\programdata\anaconda3\lib\site-packages (from mlxtend) (0.25.3)
Requirement already satisfied: setuptools in d:\programdata\anaconda3\lib\site-packages (from mlxtend) (41.4.0)
Requirement already satisfied: scikit-learn>=0.20.3 in d:\programdata\anaconda3\lib\site-packages (from mlxtend) (0.21.3)
Requirement already satisfied: cycler>=0.10 in d:\programdata\anaconda3\lib\site-packages (from matplotlib>=3.0.0->mlxtend) (0.10.0)
Requirement already satisfied: kiwisolver>=1.0.1 in d:\programdata\anaconda3\lib\site-packages (from matplotlib>=3.0.0->mlxtend) (1.1.0)
Requirement already satisfied: pyparsing!=2.0.4,!=2.1.2,!=2.1.6,>=2.0.1 in d:\programdata\anaconda3\lib\site-packages (from matplotlib>=3.0.0->mlxtend) (2.4.2)
Requirement already satisfied: python-dateutil>=2.1 in d:\programdata\anaconda3\lib\site-packages (from matplotlib>=3.0.0->mlxtend) (2.8.0)
Requirement already satisfied: pytz>=2017.2 in d:\programdata\anaconda3\lib\site-packages (from pandas>=0.24.2->mlxtend) (2019.3)
Requirement already satisfied: six in d:\programdata\anaconda3\lib\site-packages (from cycler>=0.10->matplotlib>=3.0.0->mlxtend) (1.12.0)
Accuracy: 0.91 (+/- 0.01) [KNN]
Accuracy: 0.93 (+/- 0.05) [Random Forest]
Accuracy: 0.92 (+/- 0.03) [Naive Bayes]
Accuracy: 0.95 (+/- 0.03) [Stacking Classifier]
    数据挖掘之模型融合_44_1.png

    可以发现 基模型 用 'KNN', 'Random Forest', 'Naive Bayes' 然后再这基础上 次级模型加一个 'LogisticRegression'，模型测试效果有着很好的提升。

    5.4.3 一些其它方法：

    将特征放进模型中预测，并将预测结果变换并作为新的特征加入原有特征中再经过模型预测结果 （Stacking变化）

    （可以反复预测多次将结果加入最后的特征中）

    def Ensemble_add_feature(train,test,target,clfs):
    
    # n_flods = 5
    # skf = list(StratifiedKFold(y, n_folds=n_flods))

    train_ = np.zeros((train.shape[0],len(clfs*2)))
    test_ = np.zeros((test.shape[0],len(clfs*2)))

    for j,clf in enumerate(clfs):
        '''依次训练各个单模型'''
        # print(j, clf)
        '''使用第1个部分作为预测，第2部分来训练模型，获得其预测的输出作为第2部分的新特征。'''
        # X_train, y_train, X_test, y_test = X[train], y[train], X[test], y[test]

        clf.fit(train,target)
        y_train = clf.predict(train)
        y_test = clf.predict(test)

        ## 新特征生成
        train_[:,j*2] = y_train**2
        test_[:,j*2] = y_test**2
        train_[:, j+1] = np.exp(y_train)
        test_[:, j+1] = np.exp(y_test)
        # print("val auc Score: %f" % r2_score(y_predict, dataset_d2[:, j]))
        print('Method ',j)
    
    train_ = pd.DataFrame(train_)
    test_ = pd.DataFrame(test_)
    return train_,test_


    from sklearn.model_selection import cross_val_score, train_test_split
from sklearn.linear_model import LogisticRegression
clf = LogisticRegression()

data_0 = iris.data
data = data_0[:100,:]

target_0 = iris.target
target = target_0[:100]

x_train,x_test,y_train,y_test=train_test_split(data,target,test_size=0.3)
x_train = pd.DataFrame(x_train) ; x_test = pd.DataFrame(x_test)

#模型融合中使用到的各个单模型
clfs = [LogisticRegression(),
        RandomForestClassifier(n_estimators=5, n_jobs=-1, criterion='gini'),
        ExtraTreesClassifier(n_estimators=5, n_jobs=-1, criterion='gini'),
        ExtraTreesClassifier(n_estimators=5, n_jobs=-1, criterion='entropy'),
        GradientBoostingClassifier(learning_rate=0.05, subsample=0.5, max_depth=6, n_estimators=5)]

New_train,New_test = Ensemble_add_feature(x_train,x_test,y_train,clfs)

clf = LogisticRegression()
# clf = GradientBoostingClassifier(learning_rate=0.02, subsample=0.5, max_depth=6, n_estimators=30)
clf.fit(New_train, y_train)
y_emb = clf.predict_proba(New_test)[:, 1]

print("Val auc Score of stacking: %f" % (roc_auc_score(y_test, y_emb)))

    Method  0
Method  1
Method  2
Method  3
Method  4
Val auc Score of stacking: 1.000000

    5.4.4 本赛题示例

    import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
import warnings
import matplotlib
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import seaborn as sns

warnings.filterwarnings('ignore')
%matplotlib inline

import itertools
import matplotlib.gridspec as gridspec
from sklearn import datasets
from sklearn.linear_model import LogisticRegression
from sklearn.neighbors import KNeighborsClassifier
from sklearn.naive_bayes import GaussianNB 
from sklearn.ensemble import RandomForestClassifier
# from mlxtend.classifier import StackingClassifier
from sklearn.model_selection import cross_val_score, train_test_split
# from mlxtend.plotting import plot_learning_curves
# from mlxtend.plotting import plot_decision_regions

from sklearn.model_selection import StratifiedKFold
from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split

from sklearn import linear_model
from sklearn import preprocessing
from sklearn.svm import SVR
from sklearn.decomposition import PCA,FastICA,FactorAnalysis,SparsePCA

import lightgbm as lgb
import xgboost as xgb
from sklearn.model_selection import GridSearchCV,cross_val_score
from sklearn.ensemble import RandomForestRegressor,GradientBoostingRegressor

from sklearn.metrics import mean_squared_error, mean_absolute_error

    ## 数据读取
Train_data = pd.read_csv('datalab/used_car_train_20200313.csv', sep=' ')
TestA_data = pd.read_csv('datalab/used_car_testA_20200313.csv', sep=' ')

print(Train_data.shape)
print(TestA_data.shape)

    (150000, 31)
(50000, 30)

    Train_data.head()

    numerical_cols = Train_data.select_dtypes(exclude = 'object').columns
print(numerical_cols)

    Index(['SaleID', 'name', 'regDate', 'model', 'brand', 'bodyType', 'fuelType',
       'gearbox', 'power', 'kilometer', 'regionCode', 'seller', 'offerType',
       'creatDate', 'price', 'v_0', 'v_1', 'v_2', 'v_3', 'v_4', 'v_5', 'v_6',
       'v_7', 'v_8', 'v_9', 'v_10', 'v_11', 'v_12', 'v_13', 'v_14'],
      dtype='object')

    feature_cols = [col for col in numerical_cols if col not in ['SaleID','name','regDate','price']]

    X_data = Train_data[feature_cols]
Y_data = Train_data['price']

X_test  = TestA_data[feature_cols]

print('X train shape:',X_data.shape)
print('X test shape:',X_test.shape)

    X train shape: (150000, 26)
X test shape: (50000, 26)

    def Sta_inf(data):
    print('_min',np.min(data))
    print('_max:',np.max(data))
    print('_mean',np.mean(data))
    print('_ptp',np.ptp(data))
    print('_std',np.std(data))
    print('_var',np.var(data))

    print('Sta of label:')
Sta_inf(Y_data)

    Sta of label:
_min 11
_max: 99999
_mean 5923.327333333334
_ptp 99988
_std 7501.973469876438
_var 56279605.94272992

    X_data = X_data.fillna(-1)
X_test = X_test.fillna(-1)

    def build_model_lr(x_train,y_train):
    reg_model = linear_model.LinearRegression()
    reg_model.fit(x_train,y_train)
    return reg_model

def build_model_ridge(x_train,y_train):
    reg_model = linear_model.Ridge(alpha=0.8)#alphas=range(1,100,5)
    reg_model.fit(x_train,y_train)
    return reg_model

def build_model_lasso(x_train,y_train):
    reg_model = linear_model.LassoCV()
    reg_model.fit(x_train,y_train)
    return reg_model

def build_model_gbdt(x_train,y_train):
    estimator = GradientBoostingRegressor(loss='ls',subsample= 0.85,max_depth= 5,n_estimators = 100)
    param_grid = { 
            'learning_rate': [0.05,0.08,0.1,0.2],
            }
    gbdt = GridSearchCV(estimator, param_grid,cv=3)
    gbdt.fit(x_train,y_train)
    print(gbdt.best_params_)
    # print(gbdt.best_estimator_ )
    return gbdt

def build_model_xgb(x_train,y_train):
    model = xgb.XGBRegressor(n_estimators=120, learning_rate=0.08, gamma=0, subsample=0.8,\
        colsample_bytree=0.9, max_depth=5) #, objective ='reg:squarederror'
    model.fit(x_train, y_train)
    return model

def build_model_lgb(x_train,y_train):
    estimator = lgb.LGBMRegressor(num_leaves=63,n_estimators = 100)
    param_grid = {
        'learning_rate': [0.01, 0.05, 0.1],
    }
    gbm = GridSearchCV(estimator, param_grid)
    gbm.fit(x_train, y_train)
    return gbm

    2）XGBoost的五折交叉回归验证实现

    ## xgb
xgr = xgb.XGBRegressor(n_estimators=120, learning_rate=0.1, subsample=0.8,\
        colsample_bytree=0.9, max_depth=7) # ,objective ='reg:squarederror'

scores_train = []
scores = []

## 5折交叉验证方式
sk=StratifiedKFold(n_splits=5,shuffle=True,random_state=0)
for train_ind,val_ind in sk.split(X_data,Y_data):
    
    train_x=X_data.iloc[train_ind].values
    train_y=Y_data.iloc[train_ind]
    val_x=X_data.iloc[val_ind].values
    val_y=Y_data.iloc[val_ind]
    
    xgr.fit(train_x,train_y)
    pred_train_xgb=xgr.predict(train_x)
    pred_xgb=xgr.predict(val_x)
    
    score_train = mean_absolute_error(train_y,pred_train_xgb)
    scores_train.append(score_train)
    score = mean_absolute_error(val_y,pred_xgb)
    scores.append(score)

print('Train mae:',np.mean(score_train))
print('Val mae',np.mean(scores))

    Train mae: 600.0127885014529
Val mae 691.9976473362078

    3）划分数据集，并用多种方法训练和预测

    ## Split data with val
x_train,x_val,y_train,y_val = train_test_split(X_data,Y_data,test_size=0.3)

## Train and Predict
print('Predict LR...')
model_lr = build_model_lr(x_train,y_train)
val_lr = model_lr.predict(x_val)
subA_lr = model_lr.predict(X_test)

print('Predict Ridge...')
model_ridge = build_model_ridge(x_train,y_train)
val_ridge = model_ridge.predict(x_val)
subA_ridge = model_ridge.predict(X_test)

print('Predict Lasso...')
model_lasso = build_model_lasso(x_train,y_train)
val_lasso = model_lasso.predict(x_val)
subA_lasso = model_lasso.predict(X_test)

print('Predict GBDT...')
model_gbdt = build_model_gbdt(x_train,y_train)
val_gbdt = model_gbdt.predict(x_val)
subA_gbdt = model_gbdt.predict(X_test)


    Predict LR...
Predict Ridge...
Predict Lasso...
Predict GBDT...
{'learning_rate': 0.2}

    一般比赛中效果最为显著的两种方法

    print('predict XGB...')
model_xgb = build_model_xgb(x_train,y_train)
val_xgb = model_xgb.predict(x_val)
subA_xgb = model_xgb.predict(X_test)

print('predict lgb...')
model_lgb = build_model_lgb(x_train,y_train)
val_lgb = model_lgb.predict(x_val)
subA_lgb = model_lgb.predict(X_test)

    predict XGB...
predict lgb...

    print('Sta inf of lgb:')
Sta_inf(subA_lgb)

    Sta inf of lgb:
_min -113.02647702199383
_max: 90367.18180594654
_mean 5926.360831805605
_ptp 90480.20828296854
_std 7352.037499240903
_var 54052455.39024443

    1）加权融合

    def Weighted_method(test_pre1,test_pre2,test_pre3,w=[1/3,1/3,1/3]):
    Weighted_result = w[0]*pd.Series(test_pre1)+w[1]*pd.Series(test_pre2)+w[2]*pd.Series(test_pre3)
    return Weighted_result

## Init the Weight
w = [0.3,0.4,0.3]

## 测试验证集准确度
val_pre = Weighted_method(val_lgb,val_xgb,val_gbdt,w)
MAE_Weighted = mean_absolute_error(y_val,val_pre)
print('MAE of Weighted of val:',MAE_Weighted)

## 预测数据部分
subA = Weighted_method(subA_lgb,subA_xgb,subA_gbdt,w)
print('Sta inf:')
Sta_inf(subA)
## 生成提交文件
sub = pd.DataFrame()
sub['SaleID'] = X_test.index
sub['price'] = subA
sub.to_csv('./sub_Weighted.csv',index=False)

    MAE of Weighted of val: 721.1704120165163
Sta inf:
_min -197.09928483735297
_max: 91079.8298898976
_mean 5928.720726400139
_ptp 91276.92917473496
_std 7341.282090664513
_var 53894422.73471152

    ## 与简单的LR（线性回归）进行对比
val_lr_pred = model_lr.predict(x_val)
MAE_lr = mean_absolute_error(y_val,val_lr_pred)
print('MAE of lr:',MAE_lr)

    MAE of lr: 2601.82041433559

    2）Starking融合

    ## Starking

## 第一层
train_lgb_pred = model_lgb.predict(x_train)
train_xgb_pred = model_xgb.predict(x_train)
train_gbdt_pred = model_gbdt.predict(x_train)

Strak_X_train = pd.DataFrame()
Strak_X_train['Method_1'] = train_lgb_pred
Strak_X_train['Method_2'] = train_xgb_pred
Strak_X_train['Method_3'] = train_gbdt_pred

Strak_X_val = pd.DataFrame()
Strak_X_val['Method_1'] = val_lgb
Strak_X_val['Method_2'] = val_xgb
Strak_X_val['Method_3'] = val_gbdt

Strak_X_test = pd.DataFrame()
Strak_X_test['Method_1'] = subA_lgb
Strak_X_test['Method_2'] = subA_xgb
Strak_X_test['Method_3'] = subA_gbdt

    Strak_X_test.head()

    ## level2-method 
model_lr_Stacking = build_model_lr(Strak_X_train,y_train)
## 训练集
train_pre_Stacking = model_lr_Stacking.predict(Strak_X_train)
print('MAE of Stacking-LR:',mean_absolute_error(y_train,train_pre_Stacking))

## 验证集
val_pre_Stacking = model_lr_Stacking.predict(Strak_X_val)
print('MAE of Stacking-LR:',mean_absolute_error(y_val,val_pre_Stacking))

## 预测集
print('Predict Stacking-LR...')
subA_Stacking = model_lr_Stacking.predict(Strak_X_test)


    MAE of Stacking-LR: 635.088640438716
MAE of Stacking-LR: 717.0504813030163
Predict Stacking-LR...

    subA_Stacking[subA_Stacking<10]=10  ## 去除过小的预测值

sub = pd.DataFrame()
sub['SaleID'] = TestA_data.SaleID
sub['price'] = subA_Stacking
sub.to_csv('./sub_Stacking.csv',index=False)

    print('Sta inf:')
Sta_inf(subA_Stacking)

    Sta inf:
_min 10.0
_max: 93069.56247871982
_mean 5926.1644584540845
_ptp 93059.56247871982
_std 7391.202609036913
_var 54629876.00783407

    3.4 经验总结

    比赛的融合这个问题，个人的看法来说其实涉及多个层面，也是提分和提升模型鲁棒性的一种重要方法：

    • 1）结果层面的融合，这种是最常见的融合方法，其可行的融合方法也有很多，比如根据结果的得分进行加权融合，还可以做Log，exp处理等。在做结果融合的时候，有一个很重要的条件是模型结果的得分要比较近似，然后结果的差异要比较大，这样的结果融合往往有比较好的效果提升。

    • 2）特征层面的融合，这个层面其实感觉不叫融合，准确说可以叫分割，很多时候如果我们用同种模型训练，可以把特征进行切分给不同的模型，然后在后面进行模型或者结果融合有时也能产生比较好的效果。

    • 3）模型层面的融合，模型层面的融合可能就涉及模型的堆叠和设计，比如加Staking层，部分模型的结果作为特征输入等，这些就需要多实验和思考了，基于模型层面的融合最好不同模型类型要有一定的差异，用同种模型不同的参数的收益一般是比较小的。

    相关文章

      网友评论

          本文标题：数据挖掘组队学习之模型融合

          本文链接：https://www.haomeiwen.com/subject/namgyhtx.html

          延伸阅读

          深度阅读

          • 您也可以注册成为美文阅读网的作者，发表您的原创作品、分享您的心情！

          栏目导航

          热点阅读

          关于我们|服务条款|联系我们|数据挖掘组队学习之模型融合|投稿指南|网站地图|RSS订阅|排版工具|手机版

          提供经典美文摘抄,优美散文欣赏,现代诗歌精选,短篇小说,心情随笔,表白情书范文,故事会在线阅读欣赏

          Copyright © 2014-2023 Haomeiwen.com All Rights Reserved. 好美文阅读网 版权所有

          备案信息：桂公网安备 45052102000051号 · 桂ICP备13007215号-3

          本站所收录作品、热点评论等信息部分来源互联网，目的只是为了系统归纳学习和传递资讯

          所有作品版权归原创作者所有，与本站立场无关，如不慎侵犯了你的权益，请联系我们告知，我们将做删除处理！