It's not uncommon to see the ?: operator being used as a control construct although it's originally defined as an operator:
if (con) {
clause 1;
} else {
clause 2;
}
with ?: as control construct can be written as:
con ? clause 1 : clause2;
It's correct, grammatically & technically and much more compact, compared to the if-else idiom. However it's not the way
this operator is supposed to be used.
It's not uncommon to see the ?: operator being used as a ...
I have read three articles concerning the idea of "do it ...
Recently, I am reading several books concerning to Hawai'...
I'm writing concerning what I've learned about how to wri...
I would fain say something, not so much concerning the Ch...
I would fain say something,not so much concerning the Chi...
I am an 18-year-old middle school student. Concerning an ...
And this is the Graph implementation:
This is the first of a 2-part series, which gives a brief...
event TransferSingle(address indexed _operator, address i...
本文标题：Concerning the ?: Operator: Is I
本文链接：https://www.haomeiwen.com/subject/xwduiktx.html
网友评论