美文网首页
研究方法:防止错误的保障(四)——读《心理学改变思维》(二十一)

研究方法:防止错误的保障(四)——读《心理学改变思维》(二十一)

作者: 刘东利2020 | 来源:发表于2022-04-23 16:53 被阅读0次

那么,自我报告法的利与弊呢?

Self-report mea�sures have a key advantage: They’re easy and cheap to administer.

Self-report measures of personality traits and behaviors often work reason�ably well.

就是:

- 实施简单

- 报告的人格特征和性格往往相当准确

对应地,其不足:

First, they typically assume that respondents possess enough insight into their per�sonality characteristics to report on them accurately (de Waal, 2016; Nisbett & Wilson, 1977; Oltmanns & Turkheimer, 2009).

Second, self-report questionnaires typically assume that participants are honest in their responses.

Not surprisingly, some respondents engage in response sets — tendencies to distort their answers to questions...

A nearly opposite response set is malingering, the tendency to make ourselves appear psychologically disturbed with the aim of achieving a clear-cut personal goal (Ebrahim etal., 2015; Rogers, 2008).

其缺点、或者说不足在于“自我”:

- 会自我膨胀、美化,来自于自我觉察的不足

- 会表演,这是有意识的“欺骗”,甚至

- 让自己得病,出现心理障碍以保护自己

那么,换种方式呢?让别人来评价呢?这可以规避自我觉察的盲点:

Rating data can circumvent some of the problems with self-report data, because observ�ers may not have the same “blind spots” as the people they’re rating (who are often called the targets of the rating).

其缺点,也来自于评价者的心理作用,会不自觉的由点及面,将喜爱或不喜爱扩大 —— 无论是正面的“光环效应”,还是负面的“号角效果”(恶魔长着horn):

Like self-report measures, rating data have their drawbacks too; one such shortcoming is the halo effect.

Conversely, if you detest a teacher, you’re more likely to punish him or her by providing poor ratings on teaching quality (this reverse halo effect is sometimes called the horns effect—picture a devil’s horns—or pitchfork effect.) (Corsini, 1999)

相关文章

网友评论

      本文标题:研究方法:防止错误的保障(四)——读《心理学改变思维》(二十一)

      本文链接:https://www.haomeiwen.com/subject/mqzoertx.html