聊聊新媒体与传播(英文)

作者: simoncos | 来源:发表于2014-11-28 13:21 被阅读885次

    本文是我申请某港校新媒体硕士时准备的材料(因此采用了英文),在此和谐了相关的个人信息。文章主要想表达对新媒体及传播领域相关的一些个人思考,现在拿出来与大家分享。

    正文如下:

    Media and New Media

    What is new media? According to Wikipedia, “new media refers to on-demand access to content anytime, anywhere, on any digital device, as well as interactive user feedback, and creative participation. Another aspect of new media is the real-time generation of new and unregulated content”.

    This is not a satisfactory answer to me. Actually I think new media is a fuzzy concept. What is new and what is traditional, there is no clear boundary line. We don’t think radio and TV are new media but they really were decades ago. Internet and smart devices we call new media now may be traditional representatives in the future. The definition changes and evolves continuously. Subversion may be born at any time. So maybe we should first discuss something more constant and more basic: What is media?

    Since the moment I came across this rather abstract term in my primary school’s Nature course, I have been always considering this basic question. The word has jumped out from nearly every corner: physics, chemistry, life science, computer science, and daily life. Media’s definitions and examples differ much in different disciplines, but in fact just various forms of media.

    Assuming we have two characters: the sender and the receiver. If the sender wants to communicate with the receiver, it must sends some information to the receiver, and media are the tools that are used to store the information and deliver it to the receiver, and vice versa. In Communication Theory, the set of the sender, the receiver, and media can be described as a simple communication model. So media can be anything, even human beings, if only it can match this model.

    So what are the differences between a medium and another? General performance criterions such as storage quantity and quality, and delivery speed and efficiency of information should be considered. In addition, to store and deliver information, interactions happen between media and senders/receivers, which are similar with concepts of encoding and decoding in Communication Theory. I think it is these unique properties that make different media differ and new media new.

    New Media’s Influence

    We may simply subdivide the value chain of content into three links: content creation, content communication and content consumption. All of them require media’s participation.

    In the old days, people are always hungry for new messages because content’s creators were much fewer than consumers, and costs of creation, communication and consumption were high. However, the Internet’s appearance has made a big difference. Although creators are still fewer than consumers, the costs in the whole value chain has lowered so much that delivered contents from over the world can easily exceed an individual’s limited communication channel capacity and digestive ability. Moreover, valuable contents increase faster but occupy a smaller proportion. This, in my opinion, is the core problem of the Information Explosion.

    In China, people discuss a lot about either the content (內容) or the channel (渠道) is the king of the digital world (in my understanding, the term channel may refers to website, blog or social network service, which can also be treated as sub-media of the Internet, the big medium). Content is still the essential value we need, yet without channels’ high-quality communication the value cannot be cashed.

    During my work at Yihaodian and Qudian, I have been constantly puzzled by this problem. Especially at Qudian, one Internet service start-up, we have been often considering how to make the cold market start. Which task should be preferential: finding more interesting content or gaining more web traffic? Now I believe they are equally vital. In fact, these two factors interact on each other in a positive loop - one’s increase/decrease leads to another’s increase/decrease. But where is the tipping point of growth? It’s still a secret to be uncovered.

    Why does this question arise now rather than earlier? It’s because that new media and the accompanying information explosion has intensified the competition between contents for the access to consumers and made the channel’s role much more important.

    New Media has changed the content value chain, and also the content itself.

    In the first part of this article, we have talked about media’s properties. Every kind of medium has its unique properties. If we want to make use of a medium, we have to first learn about these properties, then determine what kind of information it can take, and finally create suitable content. How to describe a chocolate cake using sound, text or video? There must be differences.

    Newer Than New

    Media and content application’s future is a core issue I have been curious about. After the Internet’s popularization, the development has come into a rather gentle pace. One trend is rich-media content’s popularization. Although the most valuable information is often stored by text, integrated content with multimedia (image, audio, video, etc.) can express more information and help consumers understand and learn something faster. For creators, rich media help they produce more abundant and expressive contents and distinguish them from their competitors in the market. This may be the reason why the New York Times’ digital feature piece Snow Fall won The Pulitzer Prize.

    Another trend is value chain’s decentralization. Nowadays nearly all the new media we are talking about are tied to the Internet. The Internet and related technologies have encouraged double-directional and flat flow of information. Threshold for creators has got much lower and contents’ long tail has emerged. Consumers have been able to search and get content and communicated with creators with lower costs. Everyone can be a creator, consumer or communicator and link to each other thanks to new media. Barrier is vanishing and giant middlemen become smaller and smaller.

    However, the next revolution is still in the cradle. I have mentioned properties of media earlier. They can be classified to those general performance criterions and those interactive abilities. In my opinion, the key to the revolution of media is just the interactive abilities. Human’s senses of smell and touch are not taken full advantage of, and there are a lot of secrets of man’s perception and cognition. Technologies, which can bring brand new interactions, like the Internet of Things, Virtual Reality, and Brain-Computer Interface are on the way to real maturity.

    Newer media are yet in the future. As an individual and a newbie fascinated by the trend, what I can do is to keep watching, learning, thinking and participating.

    相关文章

      网友评论

      • LostAbaddon:@赵澈 嗯。我觉得新旧媒体构成的网络在结构上也许就会存在差异,而且这个可能更容易刻画。
      • simoncos:@ChronosTartaro 你的前半部分像是在说复杂网络领域,我在想也许我们可以通过某些指标的量级来评价媒介的新旧程度。后半部分则像是传播学的议题,我倒是觉得通过研究节点在内容方面的性质其实是可以反映传播网络本身的特性的,因为我认为内容与媒介是会相互影响的。
      • LostAbaddon:或许我们可以从信息传播网络中信息需要通过的平均节点数,以及节点上通过的信息量的分布,这两个指标来看新旧媒体的差异。
        前者如果是一个全局属性,从而刻画了整个网络的密集性的话,那么后者则反映了整个网络的功能性分化的差异吧。
        如果再进一步来分析那些高信息通量节点的属性——比如是个人还是组织,是商业组织还是政府组织,盈利还是非盈利,等等等等,那应该可以更好地看出新旧媒体的不同了吧,只不过这个倒不是信息网络本身的性质,而是实体在整个网络中所扮演角色的性质了。
      • simoncos:@杰罗姆 现在来看这文章真是落后几十年,不知你是否看过这本书:Introduction to Communication Studies
      • 杰罗姆:keep watching, learning, thinking and participating!
      • simoncos: @林胥 多谢推荐。你感觉很泛也许和这篇想要表达的内容也有关系,我主要是以一个更抽象的视角去进行思考。另外正如我文中提到的,我认为新旧是没有明确界限的。
      • 林胥:关于新媒体,我推荐一下黄河老师的《新媒体实务》。你文章没有对媒介新旧下准确的定义,在谈到新媒体影响与具体传播时,和当下的热门事例结合得很少,觉得谈得很泛哈。

      本文标题:聊聊新媒体与传播(英文)

      本文链接:https://www.haomeiwen.com/subject/tzfgtttx.html