厚黑学

If Lao Tzu had indeed met like Confucius and become a saint granted by the emperor, I think that the name of Mengke as a sub-saint would have been taken away by Chuang Tzu. The four books we read must be Lao Tzu, Chuang Tzu, Liezi and Guan Yinzi. The Scriptures we read must be spiritual pivots and questions. The books of Confucius and Mencius, together with those of businessmen Shen Han, are different. Duan, tied to the high cabinet, but encounter curious people, occasionally look around, the university, the doctrine of the mean in the book of rites, with the king system, the monthly order side by side. There are only sixteen words at stake in people's hearts, and if they are mixed up in ancient times, they will not have any subtlety or subtlety. Those who preach Taoism in later generations will surely devote themselves to the moral sutra, the gate of Xuanhuang, and study it deeply.

They will also create various nouns and discuss with each other. In my opinion, the truth of saints is just like this. The Confucian doctrine, based on benevolence and righteousness, sets a public precedent: those who do benevolence and righteousness prosper, those who do not do benevolence and righteousness die. Success or failure in the past and in the present can be justified by this case, and those who do not conform to this case will be left alone. For example, Tai Shigong's Yin Benji says, "Sibo's return is to cultivate virtue and do good in Yin." "Zhou Benji" said, "Xiboyin does good deeds." The function of two Chinese characters can be imagined. Qi Shijia said more straightforwardly: "Zhou Xibochang's departure from Li Gui and conspired with Lv Shang to cultivate morality in order to engage in commercial affairs, which involved more military power and ingenious schemes." It can be seen that King Wen's action of benevolence and righteousness is clearly a kind of power and skill, how can it be sincere for the people? When the Confucian scholar saw that the king had succeeded, he was greatly respected.

King Xu Yan was benevolent and righteous, and there were 36 kingdoms in the Eastern Han Dynasty. King Jingwen did evil to himself and put his troops to death. This is the failure of benevolence and righteousness, and Confucians never mentioned it. Their argument is exactly the same as that of karma in the countryside. When people are rich, they say that they have accumulated virtue. When people die of electric shock, they say that they are unfilial. Pushing its original intention is to persuade people to do good. In fact, the real truth is not so. What a strange saint! Yuli became a saint, stepping on the land of saints, and immediately washed his heart and changed his face. Saints inspire people, there is such a wonderful, I do not understand Cai's father is a saint, mother is a saint, brother and brother is a saint, surrounded by saints in all directions, why there are moose in the middle. Why did Emperor Shizong of Qing Dynasty call Yunyun?

Yunyun is Seth, translated as pig and dog. This dog's father is also a saint, and his brother is also a saint. The pork and dog will be miscellaneous with the saint, and the value of the saint can be imagined. Li Zicheng was a rogue. He went to Beijing and looked for the body of Emperor Chongzhen. He lightened the palace and put the coffin in the Donghua Gate to hear the mourning. King Wu was a saint. He went to the place where he died. He shot three arrows at him. He took Huang Du and cut off his head and hung it on the Taibai banner. Their father, who had been called a minister for several days under the name of Zhou, did this deed, and their conduct was inferior to that of a rogue. It was wonderful that they had become the only saint of the elite. If Wu Sangui surrendered in the case of Chen Yuanyuan, would Li Zicheng not become Emperor Taizu Gao? Naturally, he will become a saint. His deep benevolence and generosity are probably several times higher than those of Zhou Benji. Taiyi Wang Shishishi Shang, Wang Ji and Wen Wang followed.

Confucius called Wu Wang Qitai Wang, Wang Ji and Wen Wang Xu. In fact, what's the difference between them and Sima Yanyi's teacher Zhao? The alien was born in front of Confucius and was named the sage of the world. The other was born after Confucius and was named the rebellious Minister of the world. When later generations saw that the sage had done immoral things, they spared no effort to excuse him. When the evidence was conclusive and there was no way to excuse him, they told stories in books, which came from later generations. This example was opened by Mencius. He said that there would never be any bloodshed because of the inhumanity of benevolent cutting. He concluded that Wucheng's statement that the bloodshed drifted on Wucheng was false. From the three rebellions of the Yin people and the great edicts of many sides, we can see from those words that the bloodstream drifted in the course of the expedition, even though the sentence of benevolent expedition to inhumanity was somewhat false. Zi Gong said, "It's better to say that the Qi is not good. It's a gentleman who lives in a bad way, and all the evils in the world go to where they belong. I also said, "Yao, Shun, Yu, Tang, Wen, Wu and Zhou Gong are not good, so it's better to be even worse.

It is the gentleman who wishes to be in the upper class, and the beauty of the world goes to where it belongs. If we change the word "inferior" into "failure", and the word "superior" into "success", it will be more accurate. When the ancient people offered sacrifices, they asked a man to be a corpse and pointed out to the people, "This is the God sacrificed." They kowtowed to him. At the same time, the Taoist religion said to the people, "My doctrine is inherited from the saints." Someone asked, "Which is a saint?" He pointed at Yao, Shun, Yu, Tang, Wenwu and Zhou Gong and said, "This is the saint." People also treat you as a corpse, kowtowing to him for worship. Later on, the people came to their senses. When offering sacrifices, they removed the corpse. Only the dream of saints remained unawakened for thousands of years. Yao, Shun, Yu, Tang, Wenwu and Zhou Gong were worshipped for thousands of years. The person who talks about cause and effect says that there is a King of Yan. He asks where the King of Yan is. He says that he is underground. The Jesuit speaker says there is a God. He asks where God is. He says there is a God in heaven.

The lecturer of Confucianism said that there were many saints. He asked where the saints were. He said that in ancient times. These three kinds of monsters are only imaginable, can not be seen, can not be confirmed. But if it can't be proved, the more mysterious his truth is, the more people he believes in it. The people who create this kind of argument are supposed to persuade people to be good, and their intention is commendable. If the facts are not true, they will suffer from abuses. Causal and causal evils flow into the evils of boxers, bandits and saints, so that truth can not appear. After Emperor Wudi of the Han Dynasty respected Confucius as a saint, all the world's statements were compromised with Confucius and dared not violate it. Kong Rong had a brief discussion about his parents, and Cao Cao killed him. Jikang was not Po Tangwu, Sima Zhao killed him. Confucianism can be carried out, all Cao Cao, Sima Zhao ordinary people to maintain the strength, and later opened a branch of science and scholarship, if the scholars do not read Confucian books, they can not enter the road.

A dead Confucius, he will take the officer in his left hand and the steel knife in his right hand. How can he not become a master of all ages? The scholars in the academic cases of Song, Yuan, Ming and Qing Dynasties are all the characters under the horseshoe of Confucian saints. Their hearts are devastated by the saints. Why can't their opinions stand apart? Why is it difficult to make a circuitous way? The sage of China is absolutely arbitrary. Without what he has said, later generations dare not say. If he says so, people will say that he is heresy and attack him. Zhu Zi invented a doctrine. He dared not say that he invented it. He had to explain Confucius's "knowledge of things" and say that his doctrine was passed down from Confucius to Confucius before anyone believed it.

When Wang Yangming invented a theory, he had to add a new explanation to the theory of "getting knowledge from things", so as to affiliate himself with the statement that Zhu Zi was wrong and that his theory was the direct descendant of Confucius. Originally, Zhu's and Wang's doctrines could be unique. They need not depend on Confucius. They are in the sphere of Confucius'influence and do not depend on Confucius. Their doctrines can never be carried out. Both of them tried their best to depend on the people at that time. They also said that they were pseudo-scholars, and they were seriously attacked. How can a saint search for truth when he is in this field? Han Feizi told a joke that Yun sent a book to Yan Xiangguo. When it was dark, he shouted "hold up the candle" and the writer wrote the word "hold up the candle" and sent the book to Yan Xiangguo. Yan Xiangde thought for a long time and said, "

Holding candles is Shangming. Shangming means appointing wise people." He said to Yan Wang. King Yan listened to him, and the country ruled. Although it has been effective, it is not the original intention of the book, so Han Fei said: "The first king has Yongshu, later generations of Duoyan said." What is the explanation of the four words "Ge Wu Zhi Zhi"? I am afraid only those who write "University" understand that at least one of Zhu and Wang can't escape the criticism of Yun Shuyan. Not only are there four words "Ge Wu Zhi Zhi", but they are also afraid that the annotations of the thirteen classics, the explanations of the Emperor's and Qing Dynasties, and many wonderful theories in the case of Song, Yuan, Ming and Qing Dynasties can not escape from Yun Shuyan's criticism.

Criticism. The academic curtain is the same as the political one. Saints and monarchs are twins, and depend on each other. If a saint does not depend on the power of a monarch, a saint cannot be so respected; if a monarch does not depend on the doctrine of a saint, a monarch cannot be so rampant. So the king gave his name to the saint, and the saint called him the king; and the saint gave his name to the king, and the king called him the saint. Monarchs restrain people's actions, saints restrain people's thoughts. Mr. Jun then issued an order that the people should obey; if someone violated it, it would be a great treason and inhumanity, and it would be forbidden by law. Saints are allowed to issue a kind of argument, scholars should believe;

if someone refutes, even if it is not sacred, it is not tolerated for the discussion. It is no wonder that the people of China have suffered from thousands of years of oppression and destruction by the monarch. It is no wonder that public opinion can not appear. It is no wonder that Chinese scholars have suffered from thousands of years of oppression and cruelty by saints, and their thoughts can not be independent. It is no wonder that academic decline. Because there are errors in doctrine, politics will be dark, so the order of the monarch should be reformed, especially the order of the saint. I dare not say that Confucius'personality is not high, nor that Confucius' doctrine is not good. I only say that besides Confucius, there are also personality and doctrine. Confucius did not suppress us, nor did he prohibit us from creating new ideas. Unlike later generations, Confucius had to be lifted out and overwhelmed, so that scholars'thoughts did not dare to go beyond the scope of Confucius.

The scholar's mind has been occupied by Confucius for a long time. He should be pushed aside so that his thought can be independent and the truth of the universe can be studied. In the past few years, some people pushed Confucius aside. At the same time, Dewey and Russell rushed in. They took the scholar's heart and the world's opinions into consideration. They were keen on Dewey and Russell. They became a distorted Confucius. Some people violated his doctrine and were regarded as a great rebellion. They would be scolded endlessly by newspapers and magazines. If Dewey and Russell go, someone will come out again to carry out the task of Confucius. His doctrine is not to be violated. In my opinion, academy is the public property of the world, so we should be attacked by others. If we say something wrong, we should change it from others to ourselves. Why should we adopt a warlord attitude and prohibit criticism?

Everything is based on peace. The monarch is not equal to the people, so he is entangled politically; the sage is not equal to the scholar, so he is entangled academically. I advocate that Confucius should be brought down and ranked with the scholars of Zhou and Qin dynasties. I join in with the readers and gentlemen in a row. I welcome Dewey and Russell into the room. We should oppose rituals and express our opinions in different groups. We should not allow Confucius, Dewey and Russell to stand above us. We are not above Confucius, Dewey and Russell. On the one hand, only when everyone is independent in thought can we study the truth. I have doubts about the people, so every time I read the books of the ancients, I have no doubt that I have decided to study three tips and work hard for myself. I attach herewith.

Three tips for reading: the first step is to take the past as the enemy. Reading the books of the ancients, I think that this man is my strong enemy, with him, we can not get me, we must fight with him bloody. Search for his crevices everywhere, even if there is a crevices, even if the invasion; and the ancient people tried to resist, the more fierce the battle, the deeper the attack. If it is necessary, reading will make sense. The second step is to make friends with the past. If I have some opinions about reading, I will put forward a proposal to confront the ancient ideas and treat them as good friends and consult with each other. If my proposition is wrong, we might as well follow the ancients; if the ancients are wrong, we should follow my proposition and study ahead. The third step is to take the past as an apprentice. The ancients who wrote books had a lot of superficial knowledge.

If I were confident that my learning ability was above those ancients, I might as well review their books as students'writing. If you are right, add a few tight circles to him; if you are wrong, draw a few bars with him. I think there are many interesting and interesting slang village dialects in the world. Besides, there are many books written by the ancients. The more I read, the higher my intelligence will naturally be. This is the common saying that teaching is the same. If I met an ancient man with the same knowledge as me, I would invite him out and treat him as an old friend, as Zhu Hui'an did to Cai Yuanding. If there is wisdom on me, I think of him as a strong opponent, looking for his gap, to see that the attack is not in progress.

Although I have set three steps, in fact, I have not done it. I feel very ashamed of myself. I'm doing my first step now, but I haven't reached my second step yet. As for the third step, self-determination has not been achieved for one day in one's life. For example, although the path is found out, the helpless path is too long and the foot strength is limited, so we have to work hard to move forward, walk a section, count a section.