从源码角度分析SrcollView嵌套ListView显示不全的问题
问题描述
在之前开发的时候会碰到列表滑动布局中ScrollView嵌套ListView的情况，当嵌套了之后发现ListView只能显示一行数据。碰到这种情况也是
真让人头大
于是乎开始Google，很快就找到解决方法，自定义view继承自ListView，重写onMeasure()方法，然后再加入一行代码即可解决问题。
@Override
protected void onMeasure(int widthMeasureSpec, int heightMeasureSpec) {
MeasureSpec.makeMeasureSpec(Integer.MAX_VALUE >> 2, MeasureSpec.AT_MOST);
super.onMeasure(widthMeasureSpec, heightMeasureSpec);
}
But... why?
真让人摸不着头脑
问题分析
首先应该可以想到，ScrollView嵌套ListView，ListView相当于ScrollView的子View了，我们应该去看看父View如何去测量子View的，打开源码先看ScrollView的onMeasure方法。
@Override
protected void onMeasure(int widthMeasureSpec, int heightMeasureSpec) {
super.onMeasure(widthMeasureSpec, heightMeasureSpec);
if (!mFillViewport) {
return;
}
final int heightMode = MeasureSpec.getMode(heightMeasureSpec);
if (heightMode == MeasureSpec.UNSPECIFIED) {
return;
}
if (getChildCount() > 0) {
final View child = getChildAt(0);
final int widthPadding;
final int heightPadding;
final int targetSdkVersion = getContext().getApplicationInfo().targetSdkVersion;
final FrameLayout.LayoutParams lp = (LayoutParams) child.getLayoutParams();
if (targetSdkVersion >= VERSION_CODES.M) {
widthPadding = mPaddingLeft + mPaddingRight + lp.leftMargin + lp.rightMargin;
heightPadding = mPaddingTop + mPaddingBottom + lp.topMargin + lp.bottomMargin;
} else {
widthPadding = mPaddingLeft + mPaddingRight;
heightPadding = mPaddingTop + mPaddingBottom;
}
final int desiredHeight = getMeasuredHeight() - heightPadding;
if (child.getMeasuredHeight() < desiredHeight) {
final int childWidthMeasureSpec = getChildMeasureSpec(
widthMeasureSpec, widthPadding, lp.width);
final int childHeightMeasureSpec = MeasureSpec.makeMeasureSpec(
desiredHeight, MeasureSpec.EXACTLY);
child.measure(childWidthMeasureSpec, childHeightMeasureSpec);
}
}
}
发现第一行就调用了父类的onMeasure方法，点进去看看做了什么，ScrollView的父类是FrameLayout
@Override
protected void onMeasure(int widthMeasureSpec, int heightMeasureSpec) {
int count = getChildCount();
final boolean measureMatchParentChildren =
MeasureSpec.getMode(widthMeasureSpec) != MeasureSpec.EXACTLY ||
MeasureSpec.getMode(heightMeasureSpec) != MeasureSpec.EXACTLY;
mMatchParentChildren.clear();
int maxHeight = 0;
int maxWidth = 0;
int childState = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < count; i++) {
final View child = getChildAt(i);
if (mMeasureAllChildren || child.getVisibility() != GONE) {
measureChildWithMargins(child, widthMeasureSpec, 0, heightMeasureSpec, 0);
final LayoutParams lp = (LayoutParams) child.getLayoutParams();
maxWidth = Math.max(maxWidth,
child.getMeasuredWidth() + lp.leftMargin + lp.rightMargin);
maxHeight = Math.max(maxHeight,
child.getMeasuredHeight() + lp.topMargin + lp.bottomMargin);
childState = combineMeasuredStates(childState, child.getMeasuredState());
if (measureMatchParentChildren) {
if (lp.width == LayoutParams.MATCH_PARENT ||
lp.height == LayoutParams.MATCH_PARENT) {
mMatchParentChildren.add(child);
}
}
}
}
}
截取了一部分代码，看呀看，发现了一个很可疑的方法
measureChildWithMargins(child, widthMeasureSpec, 0, heightMeasureSpec, 0);
看名称是测量Child的，跟进,发现进入了ViewGroup里面。
protected void measureChildWithMargins(View child,
int parentWidthMeasureSpec, int widthUsed,
int parentHeightMeasureSpec, int heightUsed) {
final MarginLayoutParams lp = (MarginLayoutParams) child.getLayoutParams();
final int childWidthMeasureSpec = getChildMeasureSpec(parentWidthMeasureSpec,
mPaddingLeft + mPaddingRight + lp.leftMargin + lp.rightMargin
+ widthUsed, lp.width);
final int childHeightMeasureSpec = getChildMeasureSpec(parentHeightMeasureSpec,
mPaddingTop + mPaddingBottom + lp.topMargin + lp.bottomMargin
+ heightUsed, lp.height);
child.measure(childWidthMeasureSpec, childHeightMeasureSpec);
}
一眼望去，感觉应该在里面计算子View的宽高，并且把padding值和margin值都算进去了。不管那么多了，ViewGroup是ScrollView的爷爷了吧，ScrollView里面应该会重写这个方法，因为ScrollView里面也能包裹其他的View，跟进。
@Override
protected void measureChildWithMargins(View child, int parentWidthMeasureSpec, int widthUsed,
int parentHeightMeasureSpec, int heightUsed) {
final MarginLayoutParams lp = (MarginLayoutParams) child.getLayoutParams();
final int childWidthMeasureSpec = getChildMeasureSpec(parentWidthMeasureSpec,
mPaddingLeft + mPaddingRight + lp.leftMargin + lp.rightMargin
+ widthUsed, lp.width);
final int usedTotal = mPaddingTop + mPaddingBottom + lp.topMargin + lp.bottomMargin +
heightUsed;
final int childHeightMeasureSpec = MeasureSpec.makeSafeMeasureSpec(
Math.max(0, MeasureSpec.getSize(parentHeightMeasureSpec) - usedTotal),
MeasureSpec.UNSPECIFIED);
child.measure(childWidthMeasureSpec, childHeightMeasureSpec);
}
果然，这样一来ListView被ScrollView包裹，它的宽高应该是在这里被计算的，看看到底为啥只有一个条目的高度。看到这里
final int childHeightMeasureSpec = MeasureSpec.makeSafeMeasureSpec(
Math.max(0, MeasureSpec.getSize(parentHeightMeasureSpec) - usedTotal),
MeasureSpec.UNSPECIFIED);
这里就是计算childHeight的地方，到这里我们就应该去了解一下MeasureSpec了.
MeasureSpec： 从字面意思翻译像是测量规格，它在很大程度上决定了一个View的尺寸规则。实际上MeasureSpec 是一个32位的int值，高2位代表SpecMode（测量模式），低30位代表SpecSize（某种测量模式下的规格大小）。重点就在于这个SpecMode。
SpecMode： 测量模式有3种
- UNSPECFIED： 父容器不对View有任何限制，要多大给多大。这种情况一般用于系统内部，表示一种测量状态。
- EXACTLY： 父容器已经检测出View所需要的精确大小，这个时候View的最终大小就是SpecSize所指定的值。它对应于LayoutParams中的match_parent和具体的数值这两种模式。
- AT_MOST： 父容器指定了一个可用大小即SpecSize，View的大小不能大于这个值，具体是什么值要看不同View的具体实现。它对应于LayoutParams中的wrap_content。
private static final int MODE_SHIFT = 30;
private static final int MODE_MASK = 0x3 << MODE_SHIFT;
/** @hide */
@IntDef({UNSPECIFIED, EXACTLY, AT_MOST})
@Retention(RetentionPolicy.SOURCE)
public @interface MeasureSpecMode {}
/**
* Measure specification mode: The parent has not imposed any constraint
* on the child. It can be whatever size it wants.
*/
public static final int UNSPECIFIED = 0 << MODE_SHIFT;
/**
* Measure specification mode: The parent has determined an exact size
* for the child. The child is going to be given those bounds regardless
* of how big it wants to be.
*/
public static final int EXACTLY = 1 << MODE_SHIFT;
/**
* Measure specification mode: The child can be as large as it wants up
* to the specified size.
*/
public static final int AT_MOST = 2 << MODE_SHIFT;
在了解了测量模式之后，在看这段代码
final int childHeightMeasureSpec = MeasureSpec.makeSafeMeasureSpec(
Math.max(0, MeasureSpec.getSize(parentHeightMeasureSpec) - usedTotal),
MeasureSpec.UNSPECIFIED);
在这里ScrollView对子View的高的测量模式都制定成了MeasureSpec.UNSPECIFIED,也就是说，ListView要多高就给多高，这时候我们就可以去看看ListView到底要了多高。源码转入ListView,看看onMesaure()方法。
@Override
protected void onMeasure(int widthMeasureSpec, int heightMeasureSpec) {
// Sets up mListPadding
super.onMeasure(widthMeasureSpec, heightMeasureSpec);
final int widthMode = MeasureSpec.getMode(widthMeasureSpec);
final int heightMode = MeasureSpec.getMode(heightMeasureSpec);
int widthSize = MeasureSpec.getSize(widthMeasureSpec);
int heightSize = MeasureSpec.getSize(heightMeasureSpec);
int childWidth = 0;
int childHeight = 0;
int childState = 0;
mItemCount = mAdapter == null ? 0 : mAdapter.getCount();
if (mItemCount > 0 && (widthMode == MeasureSpec.UNSPECIFIED
|| heightMode == MeasureSpec.UNSPECIFIED)) {
final View child = obtainView(0, mIsScrap);
// Lay out child directly against the parent measure spec so that
// we can obtain exected minimum width and height.
measureScrapChild(child, 0, widthMeasureSpec, heightSize);
childWidth = child.getMeasuredWidth();
childHeight = child.getMeasuredHeight();
childState = combineMeasuredStates(childState, child.getMeasuredState());
if (recycleOnMeasure() && mRecycler.shouldRecycleViewType(
((LayoutParams) child.getLayoutParams()).viewType)) {
mRecycler.addScrapView(child, 0);
}
}
if (widthMode == MeasureSpec.UNSPECIFIED) {
widthSize = mListPadding.left + mListPadding.right + childWidth +
getVerticalScrollbarWidth();
} else {
widthSize |= (childState & MEASURED_STATE_MASK);
}
if (heightMode == MeasureSpec.UNSPECIFIED) {
heightSize = mListPadding.top + mListPadding.bottom + childHeight +
getVerticalFadingEdgeLength() * 2;
}
if (heightMode == MeasureSpec.AT_MOST) {
// TODO: after first layout we should maybe start at the first visible position, not 0
heightSize = measureHeightOfChildren(widthMeasureSpec, 0, NO_POSITION, heightSize, -1);
}
setMeasuredDimension(widthSize, heightSize);
mWidthMeasureSpec = widthMeasureSpec;
}
看到这一段代码
if (heightMode == MeasureSpec.UNSPECIFIED) {
heightSize = mListPadding.top + mListPadding.bottom + childHeight +
getVerticalFadingEdgeLength() * 2;
}
当测量模式是MeasureSpec.UNSPECIFIED的时候，我们只看到了 heightSize = ** + childHeight **..，oh my god, 难道ListView只向他爸爸要了一个孩子的高度，这就可以解释清楚了为什么ScrollView嵌套ListView只显示一行的高度了。
问题解决
解决问题的方法在开头已经给出了，但是为什么要这么做呢。
我们在观察ListView的onMesaure方法的时候发现，当heightMode == MeasureSpec.UNSPECIFIED时，ListView只测量了一个child的高度，下面看看当heightMode == MeasureSpec.AT_MOST的时候会发生什么。
if (heightMode == MeasureSpec.AT_MOST) {
// TODO: after first layout we should maybe start at the first visible position, not 0
heightSize = measureHeightOfChildren(widthMeasureSpec, 0, NO_POSITION, heightSize, -1);
}
看这个方法貌似又去测量每个孩子的高度，然后赋值给heightSize了，看看方法的具体实现。
/**
* Measures the height of the given range of children (inclusive) and
* returns the height with this ListView's padding and divider heights
* included. If maxHeight is provided, the measuring will stop when the
* current height reaches maxHeight.
*
* @return The height of this ListView with the given children.
*/
final int measureHeightOfChildren(int widthMeasureSpec, int startPosition, int endPosition,
int maxHeight, int disallowPartialChildPosition) {
final ListAdapter adapter = mAdapter;
if (adapter == null) {
return mListPadding.top + mListPadding.bottom;
}
// Include the padding of the list
int returnedHeight = mListPadding.top + mListPadding.bottom;
final int dividerHeight = mDividerHeight;
// The previous height value that was less than maxHeight and contained
// no partial children
int prevHeightWithoutPartialChild = 0;
int i;
View child;
// mItemCount - 1 since endPosition parameter is inclusive
endPosition = (endPosition == NO_POSITION) ? adapter.getCount() - 1 : endPosition;
final AbsListView.RecycleBin recycleBin = mRecycler;
final boolean recyle = recycleOnMeasure();
final boolean[] isScrap = mIsScrap;
for (i = startPosition; i <= endPosition; ++i) {
child = obtainView(i, isScrap);
measureScrapChild(child, i, widthMeasureSpec, maxHeight);
if (i > 0) {
// Count the divider for all but one child
returnedHeight += dividerHeight;
}
// Recycle the view before we possibly return from the method
if (recyle && recycleBin.shouldRecycleViewType(
((LayoutParams) child.getLayoutParams()).viewType)) {
recycleBin.addScrapView(child, -1);
}
returnedHeight += child.getMeasuredHeight();
if (returnedHeight >= maxHeight) {
// We went over, figure out which height to return. If returnedHeight > maxHeight,
// then the i'th position did not fit completely.
return (disallowPartialChildPosition >= 0) // Disallowing is enabled (> -1)
&& (i > disallowPartialChildPosition) // We've past the min pos
&& (prevHeightWithoutPartialChild > 0) // We have a prev height
&& (returnedHeight != maxHeight) // i'th child did not fit completely
? prevHeightWithoutPartialChild
: maxHeight;
}
if ((disallowPartialChildPosition >= 0) && (i >= disallowPartialChildPosition)) {
prevHeightWithoutPartialChild = returnedHeight;
}
}
// At this point, we went through the range of children, and they each
// completely fit, so return the returnedHeight
return returnedHeight;
}
从注释我们就可以看出，这个方法return的是The height of this ListView with the given children. 也就是ListView包含孩子的高度。看代码中
returnedHeight += child.getMeasuredHeight();
returnHeight也是在不断的累加每个孩子的高度，所以最终会得到ListView的真实高度。
所以，现在的问题就是如何指定ListView的MeasureSpec.SpecMode == MeasureSpec.AT_MOST
再来看开头的解决方法
@Override
protected void onMeasure(int widthMeasureSpec, int heightMeasureSpec) {
MeasureSpec.makeMeasureSpec(Integer.MAX_VALUE >> 2, MeasureSpec.AT_MOST);
super.onMeasure(widthMeasureSpec, heightMeasureSpec);
}
makeMeasureSpec方法就能重新指定测量规则，第一个参数提供一个30位的SpecSize,第二个参数提供一个2位的SpecMode，然后该方法将其合并成一个新的MeasureSpec.
public static int makeMeasureSpec(@IntRange(from = 0, to = (1 << MeasureSpec.MODE_SHIFT) - 1) int size,
@MeasureSpecMode int mode) {
if (sUseBrokenMakeMeasureSpec) {
return size + mode;
} else {
return (size & ~MODE_MASK) | (mode & MODE_MASK);
}
}
走完这个方法之后在调用父类的也就是ListView的onMeasure方法，重新获取测量模式和测量尺寸，这次拿到的测量模式就是AT_MOST，就可以去测量每个孩子的高度累加了。
问题 为什么要使用Integer.MAX_VALUE。
这是整型的最大值，很大很大有32位，我们在上面
measureHeightOfChildren这个方法的时候，注意一段代码
if (returnedHeight >= maxHeight) {
// We went over, figure out which height to return. If returnedHeight > maxHeight,
// then the i'th position did not fit completely.
return (disallowPartialChildPosition >= 0) // Disallowing is enabled (> -1)
&& (i > disallowPartialChildPosition) // We've past the min pos
&& (prevHeightWithoutPartialChild > 0) // We have a prev height
&& (returnedHeight != maxHeight) // i'th child did not fit completely
? prevHeightWithoutPartialChild
: maxHeight;
}
return returnedHeight;
当returnedHeight >= maxHeight的时候，它会返回一个我们并不想要的值，我们需要的是returnedHeight,所以我们不能让这个判断成立，就选择了整型最大值。这个maxHeight追溯一下，就是我们设置的Integer.MAX_VALUE >> 2, 右移两位就剩下30位刚好和2位的模式配对。
结束语
此致 敬礼
网友评论