美文网首页
来自《自然》杂志的文章,会是什么话题呢?——老夏考研每日一题(5

来自《自然》杂志的文章,会是什么话题呢?——老夏考研每日一题(5

作者: 夏徛荣考研 | 来源:发表于2020-08-21 12:40 被阅读0次

论文(thesis)写作、期刊(journal)、同行评审(peer review)、评估(evaluate)等都是科研类文章的概念。

老夏考研“每日一题”选自《自然》,原文文章标题为“Unravelling the mysteries of preprints and peer review”(揭开预印本和同行评审的神秘面纱)。

今天给的这种题型,如果能够做对,一定给自己狠狠点赞哟。 ......

【题目】​空缺最佳的动词是  

[A] forecast

[B]oversee.

[C] preview.

[D] understand.

【试题】

Even though many policies hadn’t previously been written out in detail, Polka says that researchers are generally aware of the standards of the main journals in their fields. For example, she says, double-blind reviews are relatively common in the humanities and social sciences, whereas single-blind reviews are more common in the natural sciences, so researchers in these fields already have some sense of what to expect. The database might be most helpful to cross-disciplinary researchers publishing in a new field for the first time, she says. Polka says that scientists aren’t the only ones who need more clarity about scientific publishing. The media, science funders and the general public should _______ how journals evaluate and disseminate*research. “It’s important that the peer-review process is transparent and easy to appreciate for everyone, not just academics.”

【参考译文】

①Even though many policies hadn’t previously been written out in detail, Polka says that researchers are generally aware of the standards of the main journals in their fields. Polka说,尽管许多政策之前没有详细地写出来,但研究人员普遍意识到他们所在领域的主要期刊的标准。

②For example, she says, double-blind reviews are relatively common in the humanities and social sciences, whereas single-blind reviews are more common in the natural sciences, so researchers in these fields already have some sense of what to expect. 她说,例如,双盲评审在人文科学和社会科学中相对常见,而单盲评论在自然科学中更为常见,因此这些领域的研究人员已经对将要发生的事情有所了解。

③The database might be most helpful to cross-disciplinary researchers publishing in a new field for the first time, she says. 她说,这个数据库可能第一次对跨学科研究人员在一个新领域发表论文最有帮助。

④Polka says that scientists aren’t the only ones who need more clarity about scientific publishing. 波尔卡说,科学家并不是唯一需要对科学出版更加清楚的人。⑤The media, science funders and the general public should _______ how journals evaluate and disseminate* research. 媒体、科学资助者和普通公众应该 ...... 期刊评估和传播研究的方式。

⑥“It’s important that the peer-review process is transparent and easy to appreciate for everyone, not just academics.”重要的是:同行评审对所有人,不仅仅是对学者,都是透明而且容易理解的。

点击视频,老夏给你精讲答案!


57期刊同行评审

更多题目可以搜小程序“词邦”,或关注新浪微博:老夏考研。

相关文章

网友评论

      本文标题:来自《自然》杂志的文章,会是什么话题呢?——老夏考研每日一题(5

      本文链接:https://www.haomeiwen.com/subject/yjvtrktx.html